{"title":"Deontic Modalities in Ibn Ḥazm","authors":"J. Lameer","doi":"10.1515/9783110552386-008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110552386-008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":424752,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Jurisprudence in the Islamic World","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129935368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Value Ontology and the Assumption of Non-Assessment in Postclassical Shīʿī Legal Theory","authors":"R. Gleave","doi":"10.1515/9783110552386-011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110552386-011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":424752,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Jurisprudence in the Islamic World","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122226793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Foundations of Ibn Taymiyya’s Religious Utilitarianism","authors":"J. Hoover","doi":"10.1515/9783110552386-010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110552386-010","url":null,"abstract":"Sophia Vasalou in her recent monograph on the theological ethics of the Damascene theologian Ibn Taymiyya (d. 728/1328) insightfully observes that his view of God’s morality resembles the utilitarianism of the English philosopher Jeremy Bentham (d. 1832). According to Ibn Taymiyya, God in His wise purpose weighs up the good and the evil in order to choose the preponderant good, and the good that God does in the world far exceeds the evil. Vasalou writes, “Ibn Taymiyya’s account of God’s morality echoes nothing if not the axiom of utilitarianism articulated by Bentham: ‘It is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong’.” Findings of my own work on Ibn Taymiyya’s theology reinforce and extend the aptness of Vasalou assessment: God creates the world in the best possible way; God creates evil and metes out punishment to deter, instruct, purify, and spur on to repentance; and God’s mercy and wise purpose preclude chastising anyone in Hell-Fire forever. The goal towards which God creates and commands is universal human salvation and total worship of God that gives God His full due as God. The greatest happiness that God maximizes for the greatest number is fundamentally religious in character. Utilitarian thinking has also been observed in Ibn Taymiyya’s ethical and jurisprudential deliberation. Michael Cook notes Ibn Taymiyya’s exhortation to weigh up the","PeriodicalId":424752,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Jurisprudence in the Islamic World","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114661254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}