发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Legal Ethics最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Editorial 编辑
IF 1
Legal Ethics Pub Date : 2017-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/1460728x.2017.1401784
L. Webley, H. Sommerlad
{"title":"Editorial","authors":"L. Webley, H. Sommerlad","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1401784","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1401784","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42194,"journal":{"name":"Legal Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1401784","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45900216","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Technological competence and the duty to safeguard confidential information in the USA 在美国，技术能力和保护机密信息的义务
IF 1
Legal Ethics Pub Date : 2017-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/1460728X.2017.1405781
B. Cooper
{"title":"Technological competence and the duty to safeguard confidential information in the USA","authors":"B. Cooper","doi":"10.1080/1460728X.2017.1405781","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728X.2017.1405781","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":42194,"journal":{"name":"Legal Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1460728X.2017.1405781","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46912567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Collaborative Law: an (un)ethical process for lawyers? 合作法:律师的(非)道德过程?
IF 1
Legal Ethics Pub Date : 2017-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/1460728x.2017.1397401
B. Wolski
{"title":"Collaborative Law: an (un)ethical process for lawyers?","authors":"B. Wolski","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1397401","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1397401","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article critically examines the practice and ethical underpinnings of Collaborative Law (CL), one of the newest processes in the ADR suite of options available to parties in dispute. CL has been described as mediation without the mediator. The parties and their lawyers agree to negotiate in good faith and in a cooperative non-adversarial manner without the assistance of a mediator. However, controversially, they also agree that if settlement is not reached, the lawyers are to withdraw and be disqualified from representing the parties in any subsequent litigation. The parties must engage new lawyers and often new expert witnesses if they wish to proceed with litigation. In this article, the author highlights the potential for CL lawyers to exert undue pressure on their clients as the goal of settlement is given priority over the interests of the clients. The article describes the main features of CL, its contractual supports, its potential benefits and the potential for its abuse.","PeriodicalId":42194,"journal":{"name":"Legal Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1397401","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47917613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Should lawyers acknowledge whom they represent in public discourse? 律师是否应该承认他们在公共话语中代表的是谁?
IF 1
Legal Ethics Pub Date : 2017-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/1460728x.2017.1397403
G. Ferris, N. Johnson
{"title":"Should lawyers acknowledge whom they represent in public discourse?","authors":"G. Ferris, N. Johnson","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1397403","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1397403","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Political rule depends upon public discourse as it requires negotiation and compromise of conflicting interests. Public discourse includes activities that can be described as cause lawyering, lobbying, and rule entrepreneurship. The rule of law supports public discourse through, inter alia, the right to petition. The right to petition requires identification of those engaged in public discourse through petition. This requirement reflects a principle of general application. Solicitors owe an ethical duty to support the rule of law, including the right to petition. Lawyers without a specific duty to uphold the rule of law have ethical duties to maintain the reputation of the legal system and their legal profession. Lawyers, including solicitors, are frequent contributors to public discourse. Lawyers sometimes resist identifying the clients or client groups they represent in public discourse on the ground of the need to protect client confidentiality. This resistance is not ethically well reasoned, and lawyers should recognise a duty to disclose the identity of a client or client group for whom the lawyer is making representations in any public arena, understanding public arena to include both representations to public office holders (lobbying) and contributions to reform campaigns or consultations (cause lawyering or rule entrepreneurship).","PeriodicalId":42194,"journal":{"name":"Legal Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1397403","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47887609","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rebooting the cab rank rule as a limited universal service obligation 重新启动出租车等级规则作为一项有限的普遍服务义务
IF 1
Legal Ethics Pub Date : 2017-03-24 DOI: 10.1080/1460728x.2017.1292623
Andrew Higgins
{"title":"Rebooting the cab rank rule as a limited universal service obligation","authors":"Andrew Higgins","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1292623","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1292623","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article critically examines the value and scope of the cab rank rule in England and Australia. Despite the laudable non-discrimination principle underpinning it, the cab rank rule is subject to so many exceptions it is debatable whether the rule has any effect, positive or negative, on access to justice. On the other hand, when the rule is followed, it has the potential to unnecessarily distort the legal services market. Despite legitimate questions about its continued relevance, the paper argues that the rationale for the cab rank rule remains critically important in an age where most people are unable to afford private legal representation and are ineligible for public legal assistance. The cab rank rule could play a greater role in delivering access to justice for all, by ‘rebooting’ it as a limited universal service obligation to provide legal representation for all who genuinely need it but cannot obtain it privately. In practice this would involve the creation of a compartmentalised public cab rank in which all practising lawyers dedicate a small percentage of their billable hours to representing eligible clients for a regulated fee.","PeriodicalId":42194,"journal":{"name":"Legal Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1292623","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46516627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
An empirical study of Hong Kong law students’ ethical values: Does common law education enhance their professionalism? 香港法律学生道德价值观的实证研究:普通法教育是否能提升他们的专业精神?
IF 1
Legal Ethics Pub Date : 2017-03-23 DOI: 10.1080/1460728x.2017.1295509
R. Wu
{"title":"An empirical study of Hong Kong law students’ ethical values: Does common law education enhance their professionalism?","authors":"R. Wu","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1295509","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1295509","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article investigates empirically the ethical values of law students in Hong Kong in their final two years of legal education. It first analyses the demographics of these law students before examining their responses to different ethical dilemmas. The findings suggest that feminisation has taken place in Hong Kong law schools. The study also found that a new generation of law students is emerging in Hong Kong that put more emphasis on the value of work-life balance. Finally, the article argues that common law education has enhanced the professionalism of law students in Hong Kong and has contributed to their development of such professional values as ‘professional integrity’, ‘obedience to the law’ and ‘civil duty’.","PeriodicalId":42194,"journal":{"name":"Legal Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1295509","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47213462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
The resignation of Robin Camp: background and reflections from Canada 罗宾·坎普的辞职：加拿大的背景与思考
IF 1
Legal Ethics Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/1460728X.2017.1346550
A. Woolley
{"title":"The resignation of Robin Camp: background and reflections from Canada","authors":"A. Woolley","doi":"10.1080/1460728X.2017.1346550","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728X.2017.1346550","url":null,"abstract":"On March 8, 2017, the Canadian Judicial Council (“CJC”) recommended that Justice Robin Camp – who asked a complainant in a rape trial, “Why couldn’t you just keep your knees together?” – be removed from the bench. Camp resigned that day, becoming only the third federally appointed judge in Canadian history to do so. This comment, an abbreviated version of which is forthcoming in Legal Ethics, sets out the background for the complaint to the CJC, summarizes the process before the CJC and its decisions, and offers some broader context and reflections.","PeriodicalId":42194,"journal":{"name":"Legal Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1460728X.2017.1346550","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48620195","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
How many chief justices? Judicial appointments and ethics in Queensland 有多少首席大法官?昆士兰的司法任命与道德
IF 1
Legal Ethics Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/1460728x.2017.1348007
R. Mortensen
{"title":"How many chief justices? Judicial appointments and ethics in Queensland","authors":"R. Mortensen","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1348007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1348007","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Australia has recently experienced what many regard as its greatest judicial crisis. The appointment of Timothy Carmody QC as Chief Justice of Queensland in 2014 emerged from a process that was tainted by the state government’s willingness to break confidences gained in the course of consultation for the appointment. Equally, a strongly negative and heterodox reaction to the appointment by the whole Queensland Supreme Court bench meant that, together, politicians and judges brought on a collapse of the traditional ethics surrounding judicial appointments. Nevertheless, the extreme circumstances of the Carmody affair suggest that, where judges have a legitimate concern that a judicial appointment might put a fundamental constitutional value like judicial independence at risk, a court may be justified in publically expressing concern about the appointment.","PeriodicalId":42194,"journal":{"name":"Legal Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1348007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43171784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Justice Ginsburg, President Trump, and the need for judicial disqualification reform 金斯伯格大法官，特朗普总统，以及司法取消资格改革的必要性
IF 1
Legal Ethics Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/1460728x.2017.1326433
G. Appleby
{"title":"Justice Ginsburg, President Trump, and the need for judicial disqualification reform","authors":"G. Appleby","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1326433","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1326433","url":null,"abstract":"As the heat of the 2016 election campaign between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton was dialling up, US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg made a surprise – and arguably unprecedented – inter...","PeriodicalId":42194,"journal":{"name":"Legal Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1326433","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43434448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ethical considerations in judicial appointments in Nigeria: the role of special judicial bodies* 尼日利亚司法任命中的道德考虑：特别司法机构的作用*
IF 1
Legal Ethics Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/1460728x.2017.1352207
Ameze Guobadia
{"title":"Ethical considerations in judicial appointments in Nigeria: the role of special judicial bodies*","authors":"Ameze Guobadia","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2017.1352207","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1352207","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The power to appoint judges and the formal procedure for judicial appointments in Nigeria have been examined by writers, particularly in the context of separation of powers. Shortcomings in the conduct of some judicial officers and the poor performance of some courts continue to generate questions about the suitability of the current appointments process in the quest for a sound judiciary founded on integrity and competence. The article argues that what is missing is due regard for ethics in the appointments process. This point, often overlooked or down played by writers, should be considered by the key players in the appointments process. The article examines the ethical dimensions of the judicial appointments process within the dynamics of the composition and operation of the special judicial bodies and other groups from which these bodies receive nominations for judicial appointments.","PeriodicalId":42194,"journal":{"name":"Legal Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1460728x.2017.1352207","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41310103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信