Legal Ethics最新文献_第5页

Professional associations as regulators: an interview study of the Law Society of New South Wales 专业协会作为监管者:对新南威尔士州律师协会的访谈研究

IF 1

Legal Ethics Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/1460728x.2019.1692472

Deborah Hartstein, J. Rogers

{"title":"Professional associations as regulators: an interview study of the Law Society of New South Wales","authors":"Deborah Hartstein, J. Rogers","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2019.1692472","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2019.1692472","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Professional associations, once the bodies responsible for professional self-regulation, have lost regulatory power. Some have entered into co-regulatory arrangements with state or independent bodies; others have lost power entirely. But although self-regulation has been widely discredited, little research has examined how surviving regulator-associations are adapting to change and, in turn, how those adaptations affect their regulatory roles. Associations that have formal regulatory powers must reconcile their regulatory responsibilities with the need to retain membership and their desires to survive as organisations. This article examines the activities of the Law Society of New South Wales, an association jointly responsible for the regulation of the New South Wales legal profession. Drawing on the results of an interview study of the Law Society’s members and leaders, it analyses the Law Society’s formal and informal regulatory functions and shows how they interact with its commercial membership imperatives, to reveal where regulatory effects might be produced, or lost, and how. The findings support criticisms of association regulation and provide evidence of declining association influence. However, the association is also shown to embody self-regulatory, co-regulatory and corporate values simultaneously, reasserting regulatory influence and pursuing its own survival in the process.","PeriodicalId":42194,"journal":{"name":"Legal Ethics","volume":"22 1","pages":"49 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1460728x.2019.1692472","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41785826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Matter Mills and London-Lite offices: exploring forms of the onshoring of legal services in an age of globalisation 米尔斯和伦敦生活办公室:在全球化时代探索法律服务的在岸形式

IF 1

Legal Ethics Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/1460728x.2019.1693169

E. Carroll, S. Vaughan

{"title":"Matter Mills and London-Lite offices: exploring forms of the onshoring of legal services in an age of globalisation","authors":"E. Carroll, S. Vaughan","doi":"10.1080/1460728x.2019.1693169","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1460728x.2019.1693169","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper explores professional identity formation and the increasing differentiation and fragmentation of the corporate end of the legal profession through a consideration of onshoring, the opening (for the first time) of satellite offices in the UK (but outside of London) by elite law firms. We situate interviews with 25 lawyers, associates and partners, working in onshored UK law firm offices in work on legal services globalisation and the sociology of ‘dirty work’ (tasks and occupations likely to be perceived as disgusting or degrading). In the context of onshoring, globalisation has led to sidelining in that onshoring allows entry to elite, global firms both for those (the graduates of ‘good-enough’ law schools) perhaps unable to ‘make it’ in London and for those law firm partners and associates who have tasted City life and rejected it. That entry is, however, imperfect. It is the ‘dirty [legal] work’ that is done outside of London: seen as both lesser and also necessary to the law firm’s profitability. We see onshoring as a relatively simple organisational change to the shape of the profession, and also as part of a radical reorientation of a division of labour and what it means to be a professional.","PeriodicalId":42194,"journal":{"name":"Legal Ethics","volume":"22 1","pages":"27 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1460728x.2019.1693169","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49035552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Increasing the emphasis on family law lawyering: correspondent’s report from Canada 增加对家庭法律师的重视:来自加拿大通讯员的报道

IF 1

Legal Ethics Pub Date : 2018-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/1460728X.2018.1620158

Deanne Sowter

引用次数: 0

Did Joe Groia kill the civility movement? 乔·格罗亚是不是扼杀了文明运动？

IF 1

Legal Ethics Pub Date : 2018-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/1460728X.2018.1620157

A. Woolley

引用次数: 0

Persuasive legal narrative: articulating ethical standards 有说服力的法律叙述:阐明道德标准