Revista de Drept Constituțional最新文献_第3页

THE STATE OF EXCEPTION IN THE GREEK CONSTITUTION:THE RESILIENCE OF THE GREEK CONSTITUTION DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC 希腊宪法的例外状态:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间希腊宪法的复原力

Revista de Drept Constituțional Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2021-1-0002

Evripidis Stylianidis

引用次数: 0

VALENCES AND INADVERTENCES IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL REGULATION OF ACTS SUBJECT TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE TUTELAGE CONTROL OF THE PREFECT 宪法和法律对受州长行政监护控制的行为的规制的有效性和疏忽

Revista de Drept Constituțional Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2022-2-0006

A. Niță

引用次数: 0

Unconstitutional legal solutions enshrined in the Code of Criminal Procedure of 2014 2014年《刑事诉讼法》规定的违宪法律解决办法

Revista de Drept Constituțional Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2016-3-0004

T. Toader, Marieta Safta

引用次数: 0

Criminal law as ultima ratio / The constitutional regime of the motion of censure, according to the Romanian Constitution 最后的刑法/根据《罗马尼亚宪法》的弹劾动议的宪法制度

Revista de Drept Constituțional Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2021-2-0007

Marieta Safta

引用次数: 0

Constitutional justice in the European Union. Legislation, case law and doctrine course – notes 欧盟的宪法司法。立法、判例法和学说课程笔记

Revista de Drept Constituțional Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2022-1-0008

I. Nistor

引用次数: 0

Brief considerations regarding decision no. 26/2021 of the constitutional court regarding the constitutionality of the provisions of the art. 4881 paragraph 2 of Code of criminal procedure 关于第1号决定的简要考虑。宪法法院第26/2021号关于本条规定是否合宪性的决议。4881刑事诉讼法第2款

Revista de Drept Constituțional Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2020-2-0004

Ioana Narcisa Anițulesei

引用次数: 0

Improving Human Rights Protection on the national and the European Level 改善国家和欧洲层面的人权保障

Revista de Drept Constituțional Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2015-1-0001

Rudolf Dur Schnutz

引用次数: 1

Considerations regarding the relationship between the right of the European Union and the Romanian juridical order 关于欧洲联盟权利与罗马尼亚司法秩序之间关系的考虑

Revista de Drept Constituțional Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2016-1-0002

M. Enache

{"title":"Considerations regarding the relationship between the right of the European Union and the Romanian juridical order","authors":"M. Enache","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2016-1-0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2016-1-0002","url":null,"abstract":"The European right represents the set of juridical norms that may be enforced in the \u0000European juridical order and, according to an interpretation of the Court of \u0000Justice within the European Communities' Union, the current Court of Justice of \u0000the European Union, it constitutes “an own juridical order that is integrated into \u0000the juridical system of the member states”. As for the content of the European \u0000right, it has the character of a juridical order, namely it represents an organised \u0000and structured series of juridical norms having its own sources, endowed with \u0000bodies and procedures able to issue them, to interpret them as well as to find \u0000and sanction the possible violations.\u0000Making reference to the internal juridical order of the member states, the \u0000European right is an autonomous and original juridical order that involves the \u0000following aspects: the autonomy of the European right's sources, the autonomy \u0000of the European right's notions that do not depend on the qualifications \u0000acknowledged by the national right, the autonomy of the European norms that \u0000cannot be deprived of efficacy (of the useful effect) by the internal right rules of \u0000the member states. \u0000Several criteria to classify the European juridical norms have been expressed in \u0000the doctrine whereas the juridical force criterion had the largest support. Thus, \u0000according to its sources, the European right can be divided into the original or \u0000primary right5 and the derived or secondary right.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121317563","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Principle of Proportionality Reflected in the Case-law of the Constitutional Court of Romania 比例原则在罗马尼亚宪法法院判例法中的体现

Revista de Drept Constituțional Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2015-1-0002

Mona-Maria Pivniceru, Károly Benke

{"title":"The Principle of Proportionality Reflected in the Case-law of the Constitutional Court of Romania","authors":"Mona-Maria Pivniceru, Károly Benke","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2015-1-0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2015-1-0002","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims at presenting a more complex image of the principle of proportionality through \u0000an analysis that combines the theoretical and the jurisprudential perspectives. The \u0000precondition of this analysis is the classic opinion of this originally German principle \u0000which requires a distinction between the objective and subjective conditions of \u0000limitation/restriction of fundamental rights/freedoms, each of which shall be subject \u0000to a separate test in order to determine whether limitations/restrictions thus \u0000established are justified. However, we reveal the way in which such principle has been \u0000accepted in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, of the European \u0000Court of Justice and of the Constitutional Court of Romania, indicating the variations \u0000achieved in their case-law. As concerns the acceptance manner of the principle of \u0000proportionality in the case-law of the Constitutional Court of Romania, we analyze \u0000the fundamental differences between the classic principle of proportionality, which \u0000intrinsically characterizes the relative fundamental rights/freedoms, and the principle \u0000of proportionality covered by Article 53 of the Constitution. Likewise, the focus is on \u0000the analysis of subjective conditions of limitation of fundamental rights/freedoms in \u0000the light of the proportionality test conducted by the Constitutional Court of Romania \u0000and on the need for a precise constitutional review in order to avoid the development \u0000of distorted forms of implementation of this principle","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129573756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The provinces united with Romania and the reunification Constitution (1923) 与罗马尼亚合并的省份和统一宪法(1923年)

Revista de Drept Constituțional Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.47743/rdc-2023-1-0002

G. Rusu

引用次数: 0