发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Reconstruction of Humanist Criticism Based on the Revealed Theology of Relation 基于关系启示神学的人文主义批评的重构
4区 哲学
Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI: 10.1163/27726606-20230016
Xihou Ji
{"title":"Reconstruction of Humanist Criticism Based on the Revealed Theology of Relation","authors":"Xihou Ji","doi":"10.1163/27726606-20230016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27726606-20230016","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000From an individual’s perspective, relational fields in the philosophy of art serve as departure points in thinking about art, as well as one’s own life. This paper looks at historical texts by Zha Changping, Lü Peng, and Lu Hong as catalysts for thinking on the history of contemporary art, discovering relational fields and occurrences of truth that bring art into being, considering art relations and arising field occurrences, while also reflecting on issues concerning how art relational fields may be reterritorialized. These relational thoughts ultimately direct to a kind of humanist criticism reconstructed by professor Zha Changping. It is based on the ontology of humanist criticism, the methodology of perceptual cultural criticism, the foundational theory of world relational aesthetics, and the revealed theology of relation.","PeriodicalId":41940,"journal":{"name":"Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88547374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Influence of Renaissance Thought on Martin Luther’s View of Liberty 文艺复兴思想对马丁·路德自由观的影响
4区 哲学
Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI: 10.1163/27726606-20230014
Ruixiang Li, P. Huang
{"title":"The Influence of Renaissance Thought on Martin Luther’s View of Liberty","authors":"Ruixiang Li, P. Huang","doi":"10.1163/27726606-20230014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27726606-20230014","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Scholars have long acknowledged the substantial influence of the Renaissance movement on Luther’s Reformation. However, due to the absence of comprehensive studies on Luther’s contexts, a thorough and detailed analysis of this influence in Luther’s thought and writings has been hindered. The aforementioned circumstance has resulted in the overall disregard of this contribution in the history of Western philosophy. This paper aims to analyze the distinct impact of Renaissance ideology on the evolution of Luther’s concept of liberty. The first section will discuss the background of Luther’s reform movement and the fundamental place of the humanist concept of liberty in its impact on the destruction of the religious power of the Catholic Church. The second section will examine the significant role played by humanists, such as Erasmus, in shaping Luther’s liberal ideas during his early years. The third section will examine how Luther’s understanding of liberty was developed through his polemical exchanges with Erasmus and other thinkers. This process ultimately resulted in Luther’s distinctive and paradoxical conception of freedom, which highlights Luther’s and humanists’ historical influence on the independence, emancipation, and autonomy of the individual personality in their age. The fourth section will examine the influence of Luther’s paradoxical ontological theory on the development of Western intellectual history. Additionally, it will address the misinterpretation of this intellectual history lineage by the mainstream of Western intellectual history that occurred concurrently. Finally, in the twentieth century, the revival of Luther’s thought, which was gradually revitalized by Heidegger, Karl Barth, and other contemporary scholars, also highlights the significant influence of Renaissance thought on Luther’s theory and the whole history of Western thought.","PeriodicalId":41940,"journal":{"name":"Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88022594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Merciful Substitution”: A Comparative-Theological Appraisal of George Hunsinger’s Philippians from an Evangelical Reformed Perspective “仁慈的替代”:从福音改革宗的角度对亨辛格《腓立比书》的比较神学评价
4区 哲学
Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI: 10.1163/27726606-20230017
S. Tseng
{"title":"“Merciful Substitution”: A Comparative-Theological Appraisal of George Hunsinger’s Philippians from an Evangelical Reformed Perspective","authors":"S. Tseng","doi":"10.1163/27726606-20230017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27726606-20230017","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000This article consists of a comparative-theological appraisal of George Hunsinger’s Philippians in the Brazos Theological Commentary series. My aim is to bring the author’s constructive proposal of the doctrine of “merciful substitution” into dialogue with the evangelical notion of penal substitution. I will show that Hunsinger is largely in agreement with at least the wing of evangelicalism represented by followers of Geerhardus Vos like Richard Gaffin and G. K. Beale. I will present the case of John Owen and resort to the Canons of Dort to show that in this strain of evangelical theology, penal substitution describes only one aspect of the exchange of righteousness and guilt through participation. What evangelicals can learn from Hunsinger’s commentary, I will argue, is his relentless effort to formulate the doctrine of substitutionary atonement within an explicitly Nicene-Chalcedonian framework.","PeriodicalId":41940,"journal":{"name":"Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology","volume":"547 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86798395","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Experiment of the World-Picture Logic Philosophy: Towards a Relational Theology 世界图景逻辑哲学的实验:走向关系神学
4区 哲学
Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI: 10.1163/27726606-20230015
Changping Zha
{"title":"Experiment of the World-Picture Logic Philosophy: Towards a Relational Theology","authors":"Changping Zha","doi":"10.1163/27726606-20230015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27726606-20230015","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000This paper focuses on the discussion of the concepts of “mixed modern,” “humanist criticism” and “world relational aesthetics” proposed by the author, which are academic outputs of research and critical engagements in the field of contemporary art and culture. It points out that the concept of “mixed modern” constitutes a kind of cultural logic to understand the reality in China; the theory of humanist criticism belongs to a paradigm for criticism in contemporary art, where the individual person is in the focus; the idea of “world relational aesthetics” emphasizes the internal logic and coherence of the theory itself in the process of interpretation. From a broader perspective, as part of the author’s philosophy of art, they are only the “artistic” and “experimental” results of the world-picture logic philosophy, which is finally based on a revealed theology of relation.","PeriodicalId":41940,"journal":{"name":"Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89299648","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Theological Method of Chinese Theology in the Republican Era (1911–1949) 民国时期中国神学的神学方法(1911-1949)
4区 哲学
Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology Pub Date : 2023-07-11 DOI: 10.1163/27726606-20230018
Jacob Chengwei Feng
{"title":"Theological Method of Chinese Theology in the Republican Era (1911–1949)","authors":"Jacob Chengwei Feng","doi":"10.1163/27726606-20230018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27726606-20230018","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000The underlying framework of Chinese theology began to take shape in the Republican Era (1911–1949). After surveying three crucial contemporary works on Chinese theology, I highlight an urgent need to develop a meticulous theological method that recognizes theology’s contextual nature, conquers the liberal-conservative and elitist-grassroots dichotomous divide, and adapts to the “post-world” in the third millennium. Then I analyze the methodologies adopted by Wang Mingdao and Watchman Nee (Ni Tuosheng) by studying the starting point, orienting questions and sources for their theology. By avoiding a reductionist approach, I designate Wang’s method as ecclesial apologetics and pragmatic ethics, and Nee’s as doctrinal recovery and prophetic fulfillment. The comparison of their method yields some hitherto unnoticed insights which might prove valuable to formulating a contemporary Chinese theology in the third millennium.","PeriodicalId":41940,"journal":{"name":"Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology","volume":"170 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74988037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“How to Make Athens Closer to Jerusalem” “如何让雅典离耶路撒冷更近”
4区 哲学
Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI: 10.1163/27726606-20220013
Leonard Sidharta (戴永富)
{"title":"“How to Make Athens Closer to Jerusalem”","authors":"Leonard Sidharta (戴永富)","doi":"10.1163/27726606-20220013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27726606-20220013","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000Theology and philosophy are strange bedfellows: although they share many similar interests and constantly influence each other, their relationship is fraught with suspicion or even enmity. This problem is especially acute for those who want to harmonize their commitment to sola Scriptura with the use of philosophy in their theology. Drawing insights from Herman Bavinck’s Neo-Calvinist worldview, I argue that this apparent competition is mainly caused by the failure to recognize the organic unity between both disciplines. Without theology, all disciplines would be meaningless, but without philosophy, all disciplines would be unintelligible. Portraying the harmony between theology and philosophy depends on the success of locating the difference and relationship between the universality of theology and that of philosophy. Further, the organicity that suffuses all things and affirms the primacy of special revelation reflects the Neo-Calvinist belief in both sola Scriptura and the sacredness of all vocations.","PeriodicalId":41940,"journal":{"name":"Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89000284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Contact and Conflict: Integral Experience in Classical Chinese and Reformational Philosophies 接触与冲突:中国古典哲学与改革哲学的整体经验
4区 哲学
Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI: 10.1163/27726606-20220012
Ryan C. McIlhenny
{"title":"Contact and Conflict: Integral Experience in Classical Chinese and Reformational Philosophies","authors":"Ryan C. McIlhenny","doi":"10.1163/27726606-20220012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27726606-20220012","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000This essay offers a comparative analysis of aspects of classical Chinese philosophy with those of Reformational (Neo-Calvinist) philosophy. Such aspects form a shared root in prioritizing temporal experience (over abstract reasoning) and conceptualizing the entirety of reality as contingent and relationally dependent. At the same time, however, what marks the divergence between the two philosophies is the underlying assumptions as to what this integral reality points toward – a directionality that is critical to meaning and being. For classical Chinese philosophy, the source and meaning of reality is found within reality itself, not beyond it, construing such reality not as independent and self-contained but necessary and sufficient. This conflicts with the notion of reality as contingent and dependent. From a Reformational perspective, on the other hand, reality (i.e., all of creation) is constituted as it stands in relation to an independent and necessary Creator. The crux of Reformational philosophy is that the origin and meaning of all reality must point outside of itself to its origin in God.","PeriodicalId":41940,"journal":{"name":"Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology","volume":"113 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76209957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Meaning, Objectivity and Universality: Bavinck and Pannenberg on History and Revelation 意义、客观性与普遍性:巴芬克与潘嫩伯格论历史与启示
4区 哲学
Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI: 10.1163/27726606-20220011
Jin Li (李晋)
{"title":"Meaning, Objectivity and Universality: Bavinck and Pannenberg on History and Revelation","authors":"Jin Li (李晋)","doi":"10.1163/27726606-20220011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27726606-20220011","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000This article brings Bavinck and Pannenberg into dialogue and comparison on the theme of history. Despite the differences in their theological and social context, Bavinck and Pannenberg both seek to integrate history with theology while striving to overcome the dualism that has dichotomized history and faith since the Enlightenment. They share a common debt to the varieties of modern thought. Bavinck and Pannenberg provide modern theology with a valuable perspective on how theology might become more open and scientific in response to the difficulties posed by historical studies.","PeriodicalId":41940,"journal":{"name":"Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85648964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
How to Make Sino-Reformed Theology Possible? 如何使中国改革宗神学成为可能?
4区 哲学
Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI: 10.1163/27726606-20220010
Ximian Xu
{"title":"How to Make Sino-Reformed Theology Possible?","authors":"Ximian Xu","doi":"10.1163/27726606-20220010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27726606-20220010","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000This article aims to retrieve Abraham Kuyper’s theology to develop Reformed theology in mainland China. It shall argue that Kuyper’s concern about the varying contexts where theology is practiced shows an underdeveloped proto-Reformed contextual theology. Nonetheless, his idea of common grace serves as a conceptual apparatus through which his proto-Reformed contextual theology can underpin the construction of Sino-Reformed theology, a Reformed theology that is organically united with the history of Christianity while taking root in Chinese culture and interacting closely with the Chinese context. Such a contextualised Reformed theology can make Reformed faith an indigenous plant in the garden of Chinese Christianity on the one hand and prove conducive to the development of an organic Reformed community and theology on the other.","PeriodicalId":41940,"journal":{"name":"Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78892483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Emerging Neo-Calvinistic Barth Interpretation in Sinophone Scholarship: Its Significance for Sino-Christian Theology 新加尔文主义在华语学术中的巴斯特诠释:对中国基督教神学的意义
4区 哲学
Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology Pub Date : 2022-11-28 DOI: 10.1163/27726606-20220009
S. Tseng
{"title":"Emerging Neo-Calvinistic Barth Interpretation in Sinophone Scholarship: Its Significance for Sino-Christian Theology","authors":"S. Tseng","doi":"10.1163/27726606-20220009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27726606-20220009","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Theology and philosophy are strange bedfellows: although they share many similar interests and constantly influence each other, their relationship is fraught with suspicion or even enmity. This problem is especially acute for those who want to harmonize their commitment to sola Scriptura with the use of philosophy in their theology. Drawing insights from Herman Bavinck’s Neo-Calvinist worldview, I argue that this apparent competition is mainly caused by the failure to recognize the organic unity between both disciplines. Without theology, all disciplines would be meaningless, but without philosophy, all disciplines would be unintelligible. Portraying the harmony between theology and philosophy depends on the success of locating the difference and relationship between the universality of theology and that of philosophy. Further, the organicity that suffuses all things and affirms the primacy of special revelation reflects the Neo-Calvinist belief in both sola scriptura and the sacredness of all vocations.","PeriodicalId":41940,"journal":{"name":"Logos & Pneuma-Chinese Journal of Theology","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85870646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信