Public History Review最新文献_第10页

History Making: The Historian as Consultant 历史创造:作为顾问的历史学家

Public History Review Pub Date : 2013-11-27 DOI: 10.5130/PHRJ.V20I0.3631

J. Kalela

{"title":"History Making: The Historian as Consultant","authors":"J. Kalela","doi":"10.5130/PHRJ.V20I0.3631","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5130/PHRJ.V20I0.3631","url":null,"abstract":"History is not just a genre of knowledge but also a basic feature of human life. Accounting for the past, or creating histories, to quote David Thelen, is ‘as natural a part of life as eating or breathing’. Casual references to what has taken place make up the vast majority of these accounts. But there are also a great number of deliberately created expositions of the past. They are produced in every field of society and by a wide variety of actors, from private persons to, for example, politicians and various media. The totality of them can be called everyday history. These accounts of the past serve present purposes – histories have innumerable functions and are of countless types. Divergent accounts also influence each other, and my suggestion is that their interaction be called the never-ending social process of history-making. History making, in other words, is not the preserve of academically-trained historians. They are experts but not outside observers. Scholarly historians are inescapably involved in the social process of history making. Their work goes beyond prevailing histories: they seek interpretations that make better sense of the past than the existing ones. Embedded in this effort is another constructivist function: they demonstrate ways to think about the past and how to use it. When demonstrating ‘that’s not how it was’, historians at the same display ‘how the presentation should have been constructed’. Even if they don’t think of themselves as consultants on history making they act in this capacity.","PeriodicalId":41934,"journal":{"name":"Public History Review","volume":"32 12 1","pages":"24-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5130/PHRJ.V20I0.3631","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70740913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

'Each in his narrow cell for ever laid': Dunedin's Southern Cemetery and its New Zealand Counterparts “每个人都永远躺在狭窄的牢房里”:达尼丁南部公墓和新西兰的同类公墓

Public History Review Pub Date : 2013-10-31 DOI: 10.5130/PHRJ.V20I0.3183

Alexander Trapeznik, Austin Gee

引用次数: 2

‘What better excuse for a real adventure’: History, Memory and Tourism on the Kokoda Track “还有比这更好的理由来一次真正的冒险吗?”科科达轨道上的历史、记忆和旅游

Public History Review Pub Date : 2013-10-04 DOI: 10.5130/PHRJ.V20I0.3122

J. Hawkins

引用次数: 5

Remembering Yarrie: An Indigenous Australian and the 1852 Gundagai Flood 纪念雅丽:一位澳大利亚土著居民和1852年冈达盖洪水

Public History Review Pub Date : 2012-12-30 DOI: 10.5130/PHRJ.V19I0.3096

Wardiningsih Soerjohardjo

引用次数: 0

Arkeologi menurut Interpretasi Siapa?: Mencari Tempat untuk Arkeologi Alternatif di Indonesia 谁说的考古学?:在印度尼西亚寻找替代考古遗址

Public History Review Pub Date : 2012-12-30 DOI: 10.5130/PHRJ.V19I0.3097

Irmawati Marwoto-Johan

引用次数: 0

Kesenian Kuno Minahasa: Dari Perspektif Sejarah Publik 从公共历史的角度来看，米纳哈萨古代艺术

Public History Review Pub Date : 2012-12-30 DOI: 10.5130/PHRJ.V19I0.3098

Y. B. Tangkilisan

引用次数: 0

Colonial figures; Memories of street traders in the colonial and early post-colonial periods 殖民的数据;殖民时期和后殖民时期早期街头商贩的记忆

Public History Review Pub Date : 2012-12-29 DOI: 10.5130/PHRJ.V19I0.2870

S. Gibbings, F. Steijlen

引用次数: 1

Ancient Arts of Minahasa: A Public History Perspective 米纳哈萨的古代艺术:公共历史的视角

Public History Review Pub Date : 2012-12-29 DOI: 10.5130/PHRJ.V19I0.3093

Y. Tangkilisan

引用次数: 0

Archaeology for Whose Interpretation?: Finding Space for Alternative Archaeology in Indonesia 考古学为谁的解释?:为印度尼西亚的另类考古学寻找空间

Public History Review Pub Date : 2012-12-29 DOI: 10.5130/PHRJ.V19I0.3094

Irmawati Marwoto-Johan

引用次数: 2

Renewing the new order?: Public history in indonesia 更新新秩序?:印度尼西亚的公共历史

Public History Review Pub Date : 2012-10-25 DOI: 10.5130/PHRJ.V19I0.2837

P. Ashton, Kresno Brahmantyo, Jaya Keaney

{"title":"Renewing the new order?: Public history in indonesia","authors":"P. Ashton, Kresno Brahmantyo, Jaya Keaney","doi":"10.5130/PHRJ.V19I0.2837","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5130/PHRJ.V19I0.2837","url":null,"abstract":"After the fall of the Suharto regime in 1988, public debates over the nature of history proliferated. While focusing on a number of key national events, most notably the 1965 coup and the killing of over half-a-million people, these debates have raised critical issues over the role or potential role of public history in contemporary Indonesian society. Questions of historical authority are paramount as Indonesian historians, public intellectuals and politicians struggle with a deeply entrenched historical paradigm and narratives of the old ‘New Order’ which continues to inform history in schools, cultural institutions, the media, literature, personal narratives, public rituals and the academy. This paradigm was based on an unquestioning acceptance of official accounts of the past. The demise of the New Order has left a historiographical vacuum which individuals and groups from a broad range of perspectives are trying to fill. Some, like Professor Azumardi Aza, are seeking to straddle the divide between professional and public history. Memory has emerged as a key issue in public debates, attempts have been made at reconciliation between the left and the right, though these faltered, and turf wars have broken out between historians and novelists such as Pramoedya Anata Toer. Women continue to remain relegated to a 'macabre footnote' in Indonesian public history. History in Indonesia is at a crossroads. One road could lead to a more democratic form of public or people’s history; the other to a modified version of the New Order history.","PeriodicalId":41934,"journal":{"name":"Public History Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"86-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5130/PHRJ.V19I0.2837","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"70740274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2