EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic)最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Insights from Clinical Teaching: Learning About Teaching Legal Writing from Working on Real Cases 临床教学心得:从实际案例中学习法律写作教学
EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic) Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.2139/SSRN.1337711
H. Anderson
{"title":"Insights from Clinical Teaching: Learning About Teaching Legal Writing from Working on Real Cases","authors":"H. Anderson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1337711","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1337711","url":null,"abstract":"I began teaching legal writing in 1994, but I've since had the occasional foray into practice through supervising students who represented clients in our state's appellate courts. I directed an appellate clinic for two years, and most recently I supervised two students who briefed and argued a case in the Washington State Supreme Court. These experiences have taught me some important lessons that I have brought back to my legal writing classes. The clinical cases have not only reminded me what writing for practice really entails, and how hard it is to follow our sage writing advice, but they have given me key insights into aspects of writing that we (or at least I) don't always address in first-year legal writing classes.In supervising students who are writing for a client, ethical dilemmas come up immediately, deadlines matter, and the faculty member has to be product-oriented. The final product is important in a way that the final product of a legal writing assignment is not. We are forced to follow a piece of writing all the way through to the end and make sure it is right. Collaboration has to work. And in the end, when we realize the outcome of our efforts, we come face-to-face with our limitations. This last lesson, the limitations of “good” writing, is one of the most important lessons I learned from directing a clinic.","PeriodicalId":416511,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130502369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Role of Profit, Law, and Ethics in Residential Real Estate Investments 利润、法律和道德在住宅房地产投资中的作用
EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic) Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1080/10835547.2009.12091661
Michael J. Seiler, Vicky L. Seiler, David M. Harrison, Kimberly F. Luchtenberg
{"title":"The Role of Profit, Law, and Ethics in Residential Real Estate Investments","authors":"Michael J. Seiler, Vicky L. Seiler, David M. Harrison, Kimberly F. Luchtenberg","doi":"10.1080/10835547.2009.12091661","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2009.12091661","url":null,"abstract":"This teaching case provides students with an opportunity to evaluate the series of cash flows associated with a residential real estate investment, while simultaneously probing unique aspects of legal and ethical issues confronting the potential investment. The case also introduces students to some key differences between buying real estate as an investment versus buying real estate as a primary residence. Specifically, buyers of a home are afforded the opportunity to opt out before closing in the event (1) there has been a “major change in the project” (HRS §514B-87) or (2) they no longer “qualify” for the purchase of the home. In this sense, the prospective purchasers effectively hold a call option on the property. One interesting departure from traditional financial option theory is that the buyers have a way – albeit both potentially unethical and fraudulent – to get their premium back if they decide not to invest. This potential benefit results from (1) a loose contract provision that may be upheld by common law on a case by case basis, or (2) through the willingness of the buyer and a lender to commit what the courts might interpret as fraud. All information employed in this case is based upon an actual land purchase decision, though some specifics have been altered slightly for both illustrative purposes and to retain the anonymity of various parties to the transaction.","PeriodicalId":416511,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121265440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信