{"title":"Ekonomik Diplomasi Perspektifinden II. Wilhelm ve Theodor Heuss’un Türkiye Ziyaretlerinin Değerlendirilmesi","authors":"Hilâl Karavar","doi":"10.33458/uidergisi.954772","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.954772","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":414004,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133999843","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Litmus Test for the EU: Solidarity Principle and Challenges by COVID-19 in 2020","authors":"P. Ocak, Çağrı Erhan","doi":"10.33458/UIDERGISI.947511","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33458/UIDERGISI.947511","url":null,"abstract":"Solidarity is one of the oldest but still ambiguous principles of the European Union (EU). In the year 2020, COVID-19 took its place among many other previous litmus tests over solidarity. Initial reluctance of European instutions and lack of effective joint counter-disaster mechanisms, to cope with the unprecedented social and economic devastation caused by the pandemic, triggered once more a wave of harsh criticism of solidarity principle. Although the pandemic did not reach to its end, and it is still too early to measure its overall results in the EU, the article asserts that, a positive tendency for European members' adherence to solidarity principle is on rise.","PeriodicalId":414004,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114554882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Gezegensel Siyaset Manifestosunun Ardından Yeşil Teorinin Uluslararası İlişkilerdeki Konumu","authors":"Didem BUHARİ GÜLMEZ, Bengü AYDIN DİKMEN","doi":"10.33458/uidergisi.1054551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1054551","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":414004,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126051338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Göç-Güvenlik Bağlantısını Yeniden Düşünmek: Eleştirel Güvenlik Yaklaşımları, Özgürleşme ve Türkiye’deki Suriyeli Mülteciler","authors":"Mine Küçük","doi":"10.33458/uidergisi.777329","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.777329","url":null,"abstract":"Following the end of the Cold War, critical security approaches have made significant inroads into the security studies scholarship. The relationship between migration and security has been one of the most significant issues in this literature. This article aims to discuss the novel contributions of one of the approaches in critical security studies, namely Aberystwyth school, in understanding the migration-security nexus. These contributions are examined with reference to the example of Syrian refugees in Turkey. The article also scrutinizes Copenhagen and Paris schools, which have been employed more than the Aberystwyth school concerning the migration-security nexus. It elaborates on the distinct theoretical and empirical contributions of these schools, their limitations, and how Aberystwyth school goes beyond these limitations.","PeriodicalId":414004,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126064957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Daron Acemoglu & James A. Robinson, The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies and The Faith of Liberty","authors":"Burak Kürkçü","doi":"10.33458/uidergisi.738522","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.738522","url":null,"abstract":"Devletin varligi, niteligi, gucu ve toplumla iliskisine dair oldukca fazla calisma yapilmis olsa da, bu iliski butununun gercek bir sosyal kontrata nasil donustugu konusu literaturde soyut bir tartisma seviyesinde kalmaktadir. Bu calismada, Daron Acemoglu ve James A. Robinson’un 2019 yilinda Penguin Press tarafindan basilan “The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies and The Faith of Liberty”1 baslikli kitabi incelenerek bahse konu tartismaya derinlik katilmasi amaclanmaktadir. Devletsiz toplumlar ve despot devletler bicimindeki iki ucun ortasinda dengeyi olusturan dar koridora ne sekilde ulasilacagini izah ederek devlet ve toplum iliskisine dair soyut tartismaya aciklik getirmeyi amacladigi gorulen kitabin degerlendirmesine gecmeden once, temel tezini ve tartisma eksenini olusturan uc temel kavramin kisaca aciklanmasi gerekmektedir.","PeriodicalId":414004,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129907625","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Role of Democratic Governance and Indirect Expropriation in International Investment Treaty Violations","authors":"J. Ziegler, D. Carlson","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/b7xp2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/b7xp2","url":null,"abstract":"Democracies are thought to violate treaties less frequently than non-democracies, yet democracies violate bilateral investment treaties (BITs) just as often as non-democracies. Though democratic governments may intend to meet their international obligations, and though democratic institutions provide greater political constraints to encourage compliance, investment agreements may conflict with the goal of maintaining domestic public support. Specifically, we argue that credible elections create strong incentives for governments to side with domestic voters over foreign business interests, and to pass legislation that violates investment agreements. We use a data set of BIT violation complaints that better captures potential indirect expropriation to confirm prior findings that show a difference in violations by regime type. Since policies are not passed immediately and companies do not file arbitration complaints instantly when a potential violation occurs, democratic governments are only more likely to be sued as their time in office increases. The results suggest that the ability of voters to sanction leaders is an important mechanism that incentivizes governments to pass legislation that potentially violates investment treaties through indirect expropriation.","PeriodicalId":414004,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114873795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Maden Kaynaklarının Yönetimi Bağlamında Uluslararası Deniz Yatağı Otoritesinin Rolü","authors":"Ş. Güneş","doi":"10.33458/uidergisi.655161","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.655161","url":null,"abstract":"Bolge olarak adlandirilan derin deniz yatagi, Insanligin Ortak Mirasi (IOM) olarak kabul edilmis, burada bulunan maden kaynaklarinin yonetimi, Uluslararasi Deniz Yatagi Otoritesi’ne (UDYO) verilmistir. Bu calismada, oncelikle IOM kavraminin somurge yonetimlerinden kurtulan toplumlar acisindan onemi ve deniz hukukuna etkisi incelenmekte; ikinci olarak bu kavramin uygulamaya aktarilmasinda baslica sorumlulugu olan UDYO’nun yetkileri ele alinmaktadir. Bolge’deki madencilik faaliyetlerinde tum devletler, ‘destekleyen devlet’ olarak yer alabilmekte, ancak altina girilecek hukuki sorumlulugun sinirinin yeterince belirgin olmamasi, teknik ve mali yonden elverssiz olan devletler uzerinde caydirici etki yapmaktadir. Calismada, IOM kavramini olumsuz yonde etkileyen bu durumla ilgili olarak, Uluslararasi Deniz Hukuku Mahkemesi’nin 2011 yilinda verdigi Danisma Gorusu degerlendirilmektedir.","PeriodicalId":414004,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121420966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Geç Osmanlı’dan Erken Cumhuriyet’e Siyasal Seçkinlerin Suriye’ye Bakışı: Hüseyin Cahit Yalçın ve Falih Rıfkı Atay Örnekleri","authors":"Ozan Kuyumcuoğlu","doi":"10.33458/UIDERGISI.589445","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33458/UIDERGISI.589445","url":null,"abstract":"Developments in Syria over the past eight years prompted the arguments claiming that Early Republican Turkey had turned her back to the Middle East. However, after a close consideration regarding the discourses of the political elite in Turkey, it becomes evident that Early Republican Turkey’s Middle East policy had been tending to rapprochement with Arab countries rather than avoidance of getting involved in regional issues. This article aims to scrutinize the viewpoints of the outstanding political elite of the Late Ottoman and Early Republican periods like Huseyin Cahit Yalcin and Falih Rifki Atay toward Greater Syria (Bilad-al-Sham) in order to understand the historical and intellectual backgrounds of Early Republican Turkey’s Middle East policy.","PeriodicalId":414004,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122570683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Uluslararası Hukuku Dönemselleştirmek: Pozitivist Söylem ve Ötesi","authors":"Aynur Demirli, A. Özdemir","doi":"10.33458/uidergisi.621306","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.621306","url":null,"abstract":"Uluslararasi hukukun kendisi zaman icinde degisip donusse de, onu anlamakta bir arac olarak kullanilan pozitivist soylemin uluslararasi hukuka getirdigi tanim sabit kalmaktadir. Kavramin kendisini bir anlamda tarihsizlestiren ve mevcut donemsel baglarindan koparan bu paradigma icerisinden; uluslarasi hukukun burundugu bicimlere yonelik aciklayici bir anlati insa etmek oldukca guctur. Bu cercevede calisma, oncelikle sosyal-tarihsel baglami icerisinde uluslararasi hukukun klasik tanimlamasinin unsurlarini irdeleyecektir. Ikinci olarak, uluslararasi hukuk olarak tanimlanan calisma alani icin bir baslangic tarihi ve donemsellestirme tarzi onerecektir. Makale, son olarak, modern tarihi icerisinde uluslararasi hukukun donemsellestirilmesi icin bir oneriyle bitirilecektir.","PeriodicalId":414004,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129595991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}