Sguardo-Rivista di Filosofia最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Escaping the Anthropological Circle: Kant and Hegel on Madness and Habit 逃离人类学圈:康德与黑格尔的《疯狂与习惯》
Sguardo-Rivista di Filosofia Pub Date : 2021-06-23 DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.5018488
L. Michael
{"title":"Escaping the Anthropological Circle: Kant and Hegel on Madness and Habit","authors":"L. Michael","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.5018488","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5018488","url":null,"abstract":"Michel Foucault considers the Kantian critical approach to anthropology to end up in a circle, which is only to be surpassed in a direction which has come to be known as posthuman. But there are other ways in which to approach anthropology, which suggest a way out of the circle, or a different way of understanding it. By comparing and contrasting Kant and Hegel on the notions of madness and habit, we find spread out before us a map that might lead us towards the possible future of philosophy itself.","PeriodicalId":41044,"journal":{"name":"Sguardo-Rivista di Filosofia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48440638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Schelling, Nietzsche and (Ir)Rationalizing Religion 谢林、尼采与《宗教合理化》
Sguardo-Rivista di Filosofia Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.5281/ZENODO.4430679
Dennis Vanden Auweele
{"title":"Schelling, Nietzsche and (Ir)Rationalizing Religion","authors":"Dennis Vanden Auweele","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.4430679","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4430679","url":null,"abstract":"F. W. J. Schelling and Friedrich Nietzsche appear for all intents and purposes in opposite philosophical corners, especially when it concerns religion. Nietzsche makes no positive mention of Schelling’s thought and yet, there are strong resonances of Schelling in Nietzsche. In this paper, I will show how the later Schelling’s criticism of the way his contemporaries approach religion is echoed in Nietzsche’s philosophical assessment of religion. This concerns two issues: rationalizing and irrationalizing religion. Schelling and Nietzsche aim both to avoid two extremes, one where religion is the counterfeit double of philosophy and the other wherein religion is the absolute other of philosophy. One could say that they are looking for a non-Hegelian dialectical interaction of philosophy and religion. For Schelling, the first issue is that a rational religion takes away all that is interesting in religion from religion. Schelling’s purpose is to provide a philosophical foundation to take religion and revelation seriously in themselves, not as something that could be explained by reason. At the same time, Schelling advocates against those philosophical approaches of religion that make religion absolutely in excess of reason (fideism, irrationalism). This general strategy is mirrored in Nietzsche. For him, the first of these issues comes up in terms of the demythologization of religion, which evacuates from religion its more tantalizing elements through a historical approach to religion. The second issue regards a religion that refuses to interact dialectically with philosophy, which is discussed under the heading of the sovereignty of religion.","PeriodicalId":41044,"journal":{"name":"Sguardo-Rivista di Filosofia","volume":"111 1","pages":"285-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71080159","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信