{"title":"逃离人类学圈:康德与黑格尔的《疯狂与习惯》","authors":"L. Michael","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.5018488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Michel Foucault considers the Kantian critical approach to anthropology to end up in a circle, which is only to be surpassed in a direction which has come to be known as posthuman. But there are other ways in which to approach anthropology, which suggest a way out of the circle, or a different way of understanding it. By comparing and contrasting Kant and Hegel on the notions of madness and habit, we find spread out before us a map that might lead us towards the possible future of philosophy itself.","PeriodicalId":41044,"journal":{"name":"Sguardo-Rivista di Filosofia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Escaping the Anthropological Circle: Kant and Hegel on Madness and Habit\",\"authors\":\"L. Michael\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.5018488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Michel Foucault considers the Kantian critical approach to anthropology to end up in a circle, which is only to be surpassed in a direction which has come to be known as posthuman. But there are other ways in which to approach anthropology, which suggest a way out of the circle, or a different way of understanding it. By comparing and contrasting Kant and Hegel on the notions of madness and habit, we find spread out before us a map that might lead us towards the possible future of philosophy itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sguardo-Rivista di Filosofia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sguardo-Rivista di Filosofia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5018488\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sguardo-Rivista di Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5018488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Escaping the Anthropological Circle: Kant and Hegel on Madness and Habit
Michel Foucault considers the Kantian critical approach to anthropology to end up in a circle, which is only to be surpassed in a direction which has come to be known as posthuman. But there are other ways in which to approach anthropology, which suggest a way out of the circle, or a different way of understanding it. By comparing and contrasting Kant and Hegel on the notions of madness and habit, we find spread out before us a map that might lead us towards the possible future of philosophy itself.