发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The Scandal of Deduction and Aristotle’s Method for Discovering Syllogisms 演绎的丑闻与亚里士多德发现三段论的方法
Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI: 10.1515/rhiz-2020-0013
M. Duncombe
{"title":"The Scandal of Deduction and Aristotle’s Method for Discovering Syllogisms","authors":"M. Duncombe","doi":"10.1515/rhiz-2020-0013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2020-0013","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract (1) If a deductive argument is valid, then the conclusion is not novel. (2) If the conclusion of an argument is not novel, the argument is not useful. So, (3) if a deductive argument is valid, it is not useful. This conclusion, (3), is unacceptable. Since the argument is valid, we must reject at least one premise. So, should we reject (1) or (2)? This puzzle is usually known as the ‘scandal of deduction’. Analytic philosophers have tried to reject (1) but have assumed premise (2). I argue here that Aristotle would deny (2). Aristotle thinks that at least some deductive arguments are useful, even though they present no new conclusions. Thus, Aristotle’s view contrasts with analytic philosophers of logic, who assume that all useful deductive arguments present novel conclusions. I don’t claim that Aristotle ‘solves’ the problem: it was never posed in Aristotle’s time. Rather, I suggest that Aristotle does not face the problem because he assumes deductions can be useful, without presenting novel conclusions. Aristotle’s view of deduction tames the scandal.","PeriodicalId":40571,"journal":{"name":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","volume":"15 1","pages":"289 - 311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82622913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Titelseiten
Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.1515/rhiz-2020-frontmatter1
{"title":"Titelseiten","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/rhiz-2020-frontmatter1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2020-frontmatter1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":40571,"journal":{"name":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80553109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ancient Etymology and the Enigma of Okeanos 古词源学和奥基诺斯之谜
Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.1515/rhiz-2020-0004
E. Bouchard
{"title":"Ancient Etymology and the Enigma of Okeanos","authors":"E. Bouchard","doi":"10.1515/rhiz-2020-0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2020-0004","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Okeanos is at once a mythological figure and a philosophical concept appearing in many ancient accounts of the world. A frequent object of allegoresis, his cosmological role and his name posed an enigma to Homer’s readers, especially those with a rationalizing bent. This paper proposes that the paradoxical representation of Okeanos as a primordial generative power and a geographical limit may be explained by the influence of etymological speculation, which was a popular heuristic method used by Greek intellectuals from the archaic period throughout antiquity.","PeriodicalId":40571,"journal":{"name":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","volume":"19 1","pages":"107 - 131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78093401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Kingship at Play 王权之争
Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.1515/rhiz-2020-0002
Magali Année
{"title":"Kingship at Play","authors":"Magali Année","doi":"10.1515/rhiz-2020-0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2020-0002","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Do the early Greek poets and thinkers really “play” with their language? What sort of “play” should we expect from part of the professional craftsmen they were of a basically sound language? What did imply their awareness of the phono-syllabic nature of Greek language? And what about Heraclitus in particular, who is most concerned among them with the intrinsic virtues of Greek discourse (λόγος)? An analysis of fr. 22 B 52 DK within the melodic and sonic state of archaic Greek language reveals, instead of “play of words”, a rather spontaneous phenomenon of phono-syllabic generation, that is as necessary for the political message of Heraclitus’ fragment as the meaning of each of its words and their superficial syntactic organization.","PeriodicalId":40571,"journal":{"name":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","volume":"21 1","pages":"1 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87320081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Explaining Substance: Aristotle’s Explanatory Hylomorphism in Metaphysics Z.17 解释实体:亚里士多德在《形而上学》Z.17中的解释性形形说
Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.1515/rhiz-2020-0003
Fabián Mié
{"title":"Explaining Substance: Aristotle’s Explanatory Hylomorphism in Metaphysics Z.17","authors":"Fabián Mié","doi":"10.1515/rhiz-2020-0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2020-0003","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aristotle’s main thesis in Metaphysics Z.17, which takes substance to be a principle and a cause of some sort (1041a9–10, 1041b7–9, b30–31), is of a piece with the assumption that hylomorphic compounds are unified wholes (1041b11–12) – an assumption that proves critical to settling an important controversy about the form-matter relationship in that chapter, i. e. whether matter and form are mutually indistinguishable or rather just accidentally the same. By rejecting these interpretive options, this paper argues that form and matter are bound together by an essential link which, nevertheless, is able to preserve both (i) the different explanatory roles that each of those principles play vis-à-vis specific substances and (ii) the compound’s proper unity.","PeriodicalId":40571,"journal":{"name":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","volume":"12 1","pages":"59 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78262548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
All the Texts for Xenophanes of Colophon 色诺芬的所有文本
Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.1515/rhiz-2020-0005
Alexander P. D. Mourelatos
{"title":"All the Texts for Xenophanes of Colophon","authors":"Alexander P. D. Mourelatos","doi":"10.1515/rhiz-2020-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2020-0005","url":null,"abstract":"The series “Traditio Praesocratica” has as its announced aim to produce a comprehensive collection of the source-texts for early Greek philosophy, drawing from what has been preserved (in the form of testimonia and citations) by authors from antiquity to the middle ages, but doing so at much wider scope and more fully than has been done before. Within the individual volumes of the series, the relevant selections are presented in ample context and in chronological order – based on the dates known for the source-author. The volume on Xenophanes, the third in the series,1 starts with incidental mentions of Xenophanes in testimonia that are primarily about Epicharmus and Heraclitus (both sixth to early fifth century bce); it draws next from Plato and from Aristotle; then proceeds through other known sources for Xenophanes from the ancient Greek and Roman traditions, and beyond. To that better known record of texts it adds some from the classical tradition that have been overlooked (or perhaps set aside without compelling reason),","PeriodicalId":40571,"journal":{"name":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","volume":"30 1","pages":"132 - 147"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78658066","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Number Ten Reconsidered: Did the Pythagoreans Have an Account of the Dekad? 重新考虑数字十:毕达哥拉斯学派是否有关于十的解释?
Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.1515/rhiz-2020-0001
I. Deretic, Visnja Knezevic
{"title":"The Number Ten Reconsidered: Did the Pythagoreans Have an Account of the Dekad?","authors":"I. Deretic, Visnja Knezevic","doi":"10.1515/rhiz-2020-0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2020-0001","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We critically reconsider an old hypothesis of the role of the dekad in Pythagorean philosophy. Unlike Zhmud, we claim that: 1) the dekad did play a role in Philolaus’ astronomical system, and 2) Aristotle did not project Plato’s theory of the ten eidetic numbers onto the Pythagoreans. We claim that the dekad, as the τέλειος ἀριθμός, should be understood in Philolaus’ philosophy as completeness and the basis of counting in Greek – as in most other languages – in a decimal system. Additionally, we argue that the number ten is not even a candidate for the τέλειος ἀριθμός in Plato’s philosophy. As a final result of our discussion, we compare and contrast Philolaus’, Plato’s, and Speusippus’ accounts of completeness in relation to numbers.","PeriodicalId":40571,"journal":{"name":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","volume":"210 1","pages":"37 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"75554438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Aristotle’s Politics I and the Method of the Analytics 亚里士多德的《政治学1》与分析方法
Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.1515/rhiz-2020-0006
Manuel Berrón
{"title":"Aristotle’s Politics I and the Method of the Analytics","authors":"Manuel Berrón","doi":"10.1515/rhiz-2020-0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2020-0006","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract I intend to show that Aristotle follows some of the main guidelines of the Analytics in his investigation about the nature of the city in Politics I. I assume that Pol. I sets out the causes of the city and that the book responds to the four questions presented in APo. II.1. I demonstrate that Aristotle’s methodology follows a φυσικῶς standard. In addition, I assume that dialectic plays a secondary – refutative – role, as opposed to the opinion of Owen (1961) and Barnes (1980) that dialectic was the main methodology applied in practical philosophy.","PeriodicalId":40571,"journal":{"name":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","volume":"25 1","pages":"83 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"87621834","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Theophrastus’De sensibus in A-fragments of Diels-Kranz. Revisiting the Testimonia and their Value Diels-Kranz a片段的Theophrastus 'De sensibus。重新审视证词及其价值
Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.1515/rhiz-2019-0005
H. Baltussen
{"title":"Theophrastus’De sensibus in A-fragments of Diels-Kranz. Revisiting the Testimonia and their Value","authors":"H. Baltussen","doi":"10.1515/rhiz-2019-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2019-0005","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As a crucial source for Presocratic theories of sense perception, Theophrastus’ De sensibus deserves a closer scrutiny than the placement among A-fragments, as often suggested or instigated. This paper proposes to refine our terminology for labelling the varying quality of reporting within the A-fragments has. It supplements the existing criticism of Diels’ division by analysing neglected features. A reassessment of the assumptions underlying the terms ‘fragment’ and ‘paraphrase’ can contribute to dissolving the sharp distinction between A- and B-fragments in DK. It advocates, not equality for A-fragments, but a more inclusive and accurate evaluation of the passages.","PeriodicalId":40571,"journal":{"name":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","volume":"39 11","pages":"120 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72566004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Principle that ‘Like Perceives Like’ in Theophrastus’De sensibus 泰奥弗拉斯图斯《论感性》中“同类感知同类”的原理
Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science Pub Date : 2019-10-01 DOI: 10.1515/rhiz-2019-0007
T. Johansen
{"title":"The Principle that ‘Like Perceives Like’ in Theophrastus’De sensibus","authors":"T. Johansen","doi":"10.1515/rhiz-2019-0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2019-0007","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper considers Theophrastus’ use in the De sensibus of the principles that like perceives like and that unlike perceives unlike to criticise his predecessors. It is argued that the aporiai that arise from either position serve to motivate the view of perception articulated by Aristotle in the De anima.","PeriodicalId":40571,"journal":{"name":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","volume":"31 1","pages":"226 - 248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86429518","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信