{"title":"An Appraisal of Legal and Institutional Framework for Asset Recovery in Tanzania","authors":"A.O.J. Kaniki","doi":"10.56279/ealr.v49i1.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56279/ealr.v49i1.1","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the legal and institutional framework that governs asset recovery in the country. It is through this framework that criminal justice is administered in relation to asset recovery. It undertakes an in-depth analysis of the laws and institutional framework that deal with asset recovery. The main focus is identifying the roles of key institutions in the processes and mechanisms aimed at enabling the recovery of proceeds and instrumentalities of crime under the existing law. In the course of the discussion, legal provisions that provide the procedures through which asset recovery should be undertaken are appraised. The article reveals that there are challenges in the legal and institutional framework that governs asset recovery in the country thereby affecting its performance. Recommendations are made in order to remedy the situation. Keywords: proceeds of crime, legal and institutional framework, asset recovery, Tanzania.","PeriodicalId":405016,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Africa Law Review","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128330697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Plaintiffs v. Attorney General and Uganda Veterans Development Ltd: A Critique","authors":"Nicksoni Filbert Kahimba","doi":"10.56279/ealr.v49i1.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56279/ealr.v49i1.4","url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a critique of the High Court of Uganda’s Decision in the Plaintiffs v Attorney General and Uganda Veterans Development Ltd. It argues that the Court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs’ case was the result of the Court’s failure to analyse the legal relationship between trafficking, slavery and forced labour from both Ugandan and international law perspectives. This failure resulted from the Court’s inability to discern the legal difference between the “nature of work” and “conditions of work” and partly in the “withholding of information” by the 2nd defendant. Had the Court appreciated this difference, it would have affirmed that as a part of the means element, fraud and deception operated to completely negate the plaintiffs’ initial consent. This Article provides the legal analysis of these issues in the hope that similar legal shortcomings will not be repeated again in the future. Key Words: Conditions of Work – Enslavement - Forced Labour - Nature of Work - State Responsibility - Trafficking in Persons, Uganda.","PeriodicalId":405016,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Africa Law Review","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130915919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Challenges in Harmonising Conservation Laws on Living Marine Resources within the Framework of the EAC: Case Study of Tanzania and Kenya","authors":"Felix Otieno Odhiambo","doi":"10.56279/ealr.v49i1.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56279/ealr.v49i1.5","url":null,"abstract":"Marine ecosystems comprise transboundary resources which occupy up to 71% of the earth’s surface. Up to 90% of the world’s living marine resources exist within the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). The 1982 UN LOSC confers management and conservation of the EEZ to the coastal State’s jurisdiction. It is, however, argued that since oceans are transboundary, effective conservation of their living resources requires a coordinated approach between neighbouring coastal States. Such approaches would help to avoid a situation where living marine resources of the same ecosystem are possibly conflicting conservation measures. One way through which neighbouring Coastal States can coordinate conservation measures for their living marine resources is through the process of harmonisation of laws. Harmonisation leads to the establishment of common legal structures and institutions to aid with the intended coordination. It is therefore argued that, through harmonisation, Kenya and Tanzania would enhance theirrespective conservation capacities for their living marine resources. Key Words: Harmonisation of Conservation Laws, Transboundary Living Marine Resources, Exclusive Economic Zones, Kenya and Tanzania.","PeriodicalId":405016,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Africa Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129401097","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"From Debtor Repression to Protection: Giving Debtors a Fresh Start under the Kenyan Insolvency Regime","authors":"A. Mbila","doi":"10.56279/ealr.v49i1.3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56279/ealr.v49i1.3","url":null,"abstract":"Anchored on the normative foundations of the fresh start policy, this article examines the treatment of bankrupts under Kenya’s repealed Bankruptcy Act, Cap 53 Laws of Kenya and then traces the elements of the fresh start policy under the Insolvency Act of 2015 repealed Cap 53. Results show that Cap 53 was repressive against the bankrupt and he was never given a second chance in his economic and social life for the benefit of his creditors. Results also show that under the Insolvency Act of 2015, the bankrupt has a second chance to run his businesses as a going concern and can therefore pay his creditors from the proceeds of those businesses. The paper concludes that the Insolvency Act of 2015 breathes fresh life to the bankrupt and inspires optimism in creditors that their debts stand a better chance to be paid than was the the case under the repealed Act. Key Words: Bankruptcy Law; Repression; Protection; Fresh Start; rehabilitation; discharged debtor, Kenya.","PeriodicalId":405016,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Africa Law Review","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123942677","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Political Question Doctrine and its Justiciability in Tanzania: A Critical Analysis of Attorney General vs Rev. Christopher Mtikila","authors":"Dominic Daniel","doi":"10.56279/ealr.v49i1.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56279/ealr.v49i1.2","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the nature, application, and scope of the controversial political question doctrine. What the doctrine seeks to achieve is at odds with what is intended by the justiciability theory. While justiciability principle aims at allowing all legal questions properly brought before the court to be conclusively determined by the court, political question doctrine intends to deny litigants of legal protection by prohibiting the courts from entertaining legal disputes properly presented and which are otherwise justiciable. The controversy has always been on how to reconcile the two theories. This paper evaluates the existence and efficacy of the doctrine in legal disputes relating to the interpretation of the Constitution. It is submitted that, although the doctrine remains relevant since there are matters of public policy which are constitutionally nonjusticiable, courts in Tanzania have not developed criteria for determining when and under what circumstances should the doctrine be invoked. Keywords: Political Question, Justiciability, Interpretation of the Constitution, Separation of Powers, Judicial Review, Tanzania.","PeriodicalId":405016,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Africa Law Review","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128492443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Irregular Migration Governance in the East African Community: Assessing the Legal and Institutional Response","authors":"Deogratias I. Gasto","doi":"10.56279/ealr.v49i1.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56279/ealr.v49i1.6","url":null,"abstract":"Governance of irregular migration has recently occupied the agenda of most Regional Economic Communities. The agenda is being sparked by the existing intersection between irregular migration and national security of partner states as well as its implications for the economy and development broadly. These initiatives also find justification in the fact that migration governance is increasingly cross-cutting and requires cooperation between States and regions. One of the major tools used to achieve regional cooperation in migration governance is the adoption of coherent policies and measures. This article surveys the East African Community (EAC)’s legal and institutional frameworks designed to address irregular migration in the region with a view to depicting the existing gaps and their implications to irregular migration governance. To achieve this objective, desk research and key informant interviews were the resorted methodologies. The article finds that, the key challenges facing irregular migration governance in the EAC are incomprehensive frameworks, implementation challenges, contradicting provisions in the EAC laws, incoherent institutional framework and security challenges. It is recommended that the identified challenges should be addressed through incorporation in the legislative and institutional framework. Keywords: East African Community, Legal Framework, Migration, Regional Integration.","PeriodicalId":405016,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Africa Law Review","volume":"19 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132496391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Regulation of Patents in Mainland Tanzania: Policy, Legal and Institutional Challenges","authors":"D. Nditi","doi":"10.56279/ealr.v48i2.4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56279/ealr.v48i2.4","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the policy, legal and institutional challenges facing regulation of patents in Mainland Tanzania. It addresses the problem of delay in reviewing the Act for a very long time which defeats the fact that the patent law needs constant review if it is to keep up with the ever changing nature of patents. It analyzes the policy, legal and institutional frameworks pointing out the challenges and prospects. The challenges addressed are: One, lack of a comprehensive policy that addresses intellectual property generally and patents specifically. Two, the Act is largely compliant with TRIPs though it needs some reforms. Three, there are serious challenges facing the administrative and enforcement organs in terms of, inter alia, limited infrastructural and expertise base. It recommends that a comprehensive intellectual property policy be put in place, the Patents Act be repealed and be replaced with one industrial property law. There should also be established an autonomous industrial property office. Key words: Patent, Invention, Intellectual Property, Industrial Property, Law, Policy, Tanzania.","PeriodicalId":405016,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Africa Law Review","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116606740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"An Analysis of Judicial Trends in Disciplining Unqualified Legal Practice in Tanzania","authors":"Nicksoni Filbert Kahimba","doi":"10.56279/ealr.v48i2.6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56279/ealr.v48i2.6","url":null,"abstract":"his article has provided a considered analysis of unqualified practice in Tanzania and the approach and the willingness of the judiciary in punishing it. Although the Court of Appeal set its binding precedent in Edson Oswald Mbogoro, it is the open-door approach to this decision which is largely responsible for the nuanced approach in the discipline of advocates in Tanzania. The ensuing the approach of the judiciary has been to either punish advocates alone, expunge the pleadings they have prepared and thus prejudicing litigants, avoid any form of punishment, or even issuing a simple warning, and sometimes assuming the misconduct never happened. This represents mixed outcomes of unwillingness and non-uniformity in enforcing disciplinary measures for unqualified practice. Instead, the judiciary has been clear in punishing innocent litigants for the mistakes of advocates. This work recommends that upholding documents unqualified persons have prepared is a good practice in upholding the constitutional rights of innocent litigants following the persuasive decision of Afriq Engineering, save in cases of their complicity. The Article hopes to inspire more debate on the subject and create awareness both to advocates and the judiciary, hoping these legal shortcomings will not repeat in the future. Keywords: Advocates Act - Advocates Committee – Judiciary - Misconduct – Offences –– Unqualified Persons – Unqualified Practice","PeriodicalId":405016,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Africa Law Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116541808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The DPP’s Supremacy in the Criminal Justice of Tanzania: Analysis of the Exercise of Nolle Prosequi","authors":"Baraka Mkami, Evaristo E. Longopa","doi":"10.56279/ealr.v48i2.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56279/ealr.v48i2.1","url":null,"abstract":"The judiciary is the final and last authority in the dispensation of justice. Being the final authority in the dispensation of justice, the judiciary should have a say in every aspect relating to the administration of justice. Oddly, nolle prosequi, a power given to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) appears to oust the supremacy of the judiciary in the dispensation of justice. This power makes the DPP supreme over and above the judiciary. This article aims at analyzing the power of the DPP to enter nolle prosequi and its legal implications in the administration of criminal justice of Tanzania. Fundamentally, the article reveals that, nolle prosequi is uncontrolled and hence, the power is prone to abuse. It is recommended that there is a need to entrench limitations through legislative frameworks including restrictions on reinstitution of criminal cases against the accused person based on the same facts after nolle prosequi has been entered. Keywords: Criminal Justice, Director of Public Prosecutions, Nolle Prosequi, Tanzania","PeriodicalId":405016,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Africa Law Review","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123114749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Legal Dilemmas on Application of the Overriding Objective Principle in the Court of Appeal of Tanzania","authors":"Noel Edward Tagagas Nkombe","doi":"10.56279/ealr.v48i2.7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.56279/ealr.v48i2.7","url":null,"abstract":"In 2018 the government of the United Republic of Tanzania introduced a new legal principle commonly referred to as “the overriding objective principle.” This was done through Written Laws (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, 2018 (Act No. 8 of 2018). It was said that the aim of the legislative process was to promote substantive justice and to give statutory effect to the contents of Article 107A (2) (e) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania, 1977. Article 107A (2) (e) of the Constitution directs the courts of law: To dispense justice without being tied up with technicalities provisions, which may obstruct dispensation of justice. Therefore, strictly speaking, the new law was not creating anything new, but rather amplifying what the Constitution had already provided back in 2005 when that provision was entered into the mother law. However, since the enactment of this law, the principle of “overriding principle” has become a cause célèbre issue in legal circles in the United Republic of Tanzania. The judiciary under the guidance of the Court of Appeal of Tanzania has woken up from a long slumber to fight legal technicalities in the name of justice. This is the preoccupation of this article under review. Key Words: Overriding objective principle, legal dilemma, and Court of Appeal of Tanzania","PeriodicalId":405016,"journal":{"name":"Eastern Africa Law Review","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114618633","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}