2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference最新文献_第2页

Attributes of Effective Configuration Management For Systems of Systems 系统的系统的有效配置管理的属性

2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference Pub Date : 2008-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4519006

S. Bellomo, J.D. Smith

引用次数: 7

Thermodynamic Simulation of a Detached House with District Heating Subcentral 带区域供热的独立住宅热力模拟

2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference Pub Date : 2008-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4519054

Jonas Gustafsson, J. Delsing, J. V. Deventer

引用次数: 25

Asks the Chief Engineer: "So what do I go do?!" [1] 轮机长问:“那我该怎么办呢?”[1]

2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference Pub Date : 2008-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4518993

D. Norman, B. White

{"title":"Asks the Chief Engineer: \"So what do I go do?!\" [1]","authors":"D. Norman, B. White","doi":"10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4518993","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4518993","url":null,"abstract":"We take some ideas from the realm of complexity theory, the study of complex systems science, etc., and apply this learning to a purported way of improving the practice of systems engineering. We choose one of the very challenging domains that we face-the acquisition of electronic systems that will add significant improvements in military mission capability. Systems engineers are being asked to apply their engineering acumen in larger and more complex contexts. We offer some principles of a complementary approach to traditional or conventional systems engineering, called complex systems engineering, which show considerable promise in helping us cope with what seem to be intractable or even unsolvable problems. We focus on ensuring that our most important system elements are composable (capable of being integrated adoptively) with other such elements to satisfy emergent needs and new operational understandings not previously envisioned. This is quite different from our present acquisition process and, along with complexity principles, usually doesn't communicate very well with a typical program's chief engineer, who often asks the key question: \"So, what do I go do? \" In attempting to answer this question, we make some observations of what is done today and what we might do differently.","PeriodicalId":403208,"journal":{"name":"2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132745474","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Extending Cabled PCI Express to Connect Devices with Independent PCI Domains 扩展电缆PCI Express连接设备与独立的PCI域

2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference Pub Date : 2008-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4519048

M. Ravindran

引用次数: 8

Using Attribute Classes to Uncover Latent Value during Conceptual Systems Design 利用属性类揭示概念系统设计中的潜在价值

2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference Pub Date : 2008-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4518981

A. Ross, D. Rhodes

{"title":"Using Attribute Classes to Uncover Latent Value during Conceptual Systems Design","authors":"A. Ross, D. Rhodes","doi":"10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4518981","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4518981","url":null,"abstract":"A key challenge for designers is to create systems that stakeholders will perceive as delivering sustained value over the life of the system. The perceived value of a system by its stakeholders changes over time as a result of many different factors such as experience with use of the system, changes within the regulatory environment or marketplace, availability of new technologies, and emergent needs. During the concept phase, designers elicit stakeholder needs and desired system attributes though various methods, yet there is often significant unarticulated or latent value that remains uncovered until later in the system lifecycle. A method is presented that uses attribute classes to aid the system designer in understanding perceived value in context of an overall value spectrum. Desired system attributes are characterized using several value classes including: articulated value, free latent value, combinatorial latent value, accessible value and inaccessible value. Illustrative examples are presented to examine how this method can aid the designer in a deeper exploration of system attributes to uncover latent value during the conceptual system design phase. Implications of this method for improving the overall system design process are discussed, including strategies for bearing the costs of latent value.","PeriodicalId":403208,"journal":{"name":"2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133199221","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 16

Specifying the Principle Solution in Mechatronic Development Enterprises 明确机电一体化开发企业的原则解决方案

2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference Pub Date : 2008-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4519003

J. Gausemeier, C. Y. Low, D. Steffen, S. Deyter

引用次数: 18

A Multi-dimensional Hierarchal Engineering Competency Model Framework 多维层次工程胜任力模型框架

2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference Pub Date : 2008-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4518980

B. Wells

{"title":"A Multi-dimensional Hierarchal Engineering Competency Model Framework","authors":"B. Wells","doi":"10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4518980","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4518980","url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a multi-dimensional hierarchal engineering competency model framework that can be used to create consistent, role-specific engineering competency models. The framework enables a process that organizes the creation of engineering competency models. The resulting competency models can be employed within a human resources (HR) talent management system. The framework can also be used by individuals to characterize their capabilities independent of a specific role. Individuals can use this characterization to compare their capabilities with many roles. Summing competencies of the individuals within an organization and comparing the result to an organizational competency model provides a means of examining the total capabilities of an organization and a means of identifying organizational capability gaps. The model framework was derived using a bottoms-up approach. All of the applicable knowledge, skills, behaviors and abilities are organized in a multi-dimensional and hierarchal manner. The multi-dimensional aspect allows organizations to add or subtract dimensions depending on the breadth of activities performed by the particular organization. The model framework is easy to use and to implement in a Web based computer program.","PeriodicalId":403208,"journal":{"name":"2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133443231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

Empirical Validation of Design Principles for Survivable System Architecture 可生存系统架构设计原则的经验验证

2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference Pub Date : 2008-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4518999

M. Richards, A. Ross, D. Hastings, D. Rhodes

{"title":"Empirical Validation of Design Principles for Survivable System Architecture","authors":"M. Richards, A. Ross, D. Hastings, D. Rhodes","doi":"10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4518999","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4518999","url":null,"abstract":"Survivability, the ability of a system to minimize the impact of a finite-duration disturbance on end-user value delivery, is increasingly recognized beyond military contexts as an enabler of maintaining system performance in operational environments characterized by dynamic disturbances. Seventeen general design principles are proposed to inform concept generation of survivable system architectures. Six of these design principles focus on a survivability strategy of susceptibility reduction: (1.1) prevention, (1.2) mobility, (1.3) concealment, (1.4) deterrence, (1.5) preemption, and (1.6) avoidance. Eleven of the principles focus on vulnerability reduction: (2.1) hardness, (2.2) redundancy, (2.3) margin, (2.4) heterogeneity, (2.5) distribution, (2.6) failure mode reduction, (2.7) fail-safe, (2.8) evolution, (2.9) containment, (2.10) replacement, and (2.11) repair. In this paper, the completeness, taxonomic precision, and domain-specific applicability of the design principle framework is empirically tested through case applications to survivability features of the F-16C combat aircraft and Iridium satellite system. Integrating results of these two tests with previous tests (e.g., UH-60A Blackhawk helicopter, A-10A aircraft), the validity of the design principle framework for aerospace systems is demonstrated.","PeriodicalId":403208,"journal":{"name":"2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123340125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 21

Architecting Systems for Value Robustness: Research Motivations and Progress 构建价值稳健性系统:研究动机与进展

2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference Pub Date : 2008-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4519011

A. Ross, D. Rhodes

引用次数: 53

Framework for Creative/Innovative Systems 创意/创新系统框架

2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference Pub Date : 2008-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4519057

M. Ibrahim, M. Bassford, H. Ackerley, A. Almiladi

引用次数: 2