Justice and Equality Here and Now最新文献

Justice and Equality Here and Now Pub Date : 2019-04-15 DOI: 10.7591/9781501738753-007

M. Walzer

引用次数: 0

5. Self-Ownership, World-Ownership, and Equality 5. 自我所有权、世界所有权和平等

Justice and Equality Here and Now Pub Date : 2019-04-15 DOI: 10.7591/9781501738753-006

G. Cohen

{"title":"5. Self-Ownership, World-Ownership, and Equality","authors":"G. Cohen","doi":"10.7591/9781501738753-006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501738753-006","url":null,"abstract":"… the original ‘appropriation’ of opportunities by private owners involves investment in exploration, in detailed investigation and appraisal by trial and error of the findings, in development work of many kinds necessary to secure and market a product – besides the cost of buying off or killing or driving off previous claimants. (Frank H. Knight, ‘Some Fallacies in the Interpretation of Social Cost’) 1. Anarchy, State, and Utopia is routinely characterized as libertarian , an epithet which suggests that liberty enjoys unrivalled pride of place in Nozick's political philosophy. But that suggestion is at best misleading. For the primary commitment of his philosophy is not to liberty but to the thesis of self-ownership, which says that each person is the morally rightful owner of his own person and powers, and, consequently , that each is free (morally speaking) to use those powers as he wishes, provided that he does not deploy them aggressively against others. ‘Libertarianism’ affirms not freedom as such, but freedom of a certain type, whose shape is delineated by the thesis of self-ownership. In so designating what is central and what is derivative in Nozick, I am denying that he thinks that freedom comes first and that people qualify as self-owners because lack of self-ownership means lack of freedom.","PeriodicalId":398707,"journal":{"name":"Justice and Equality Here and Now","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129097842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

4. Equality of Opportunity and Liberal Theory 4. 机会平等与自由主义理论

Justice and Equality Here and Now Pub Date : 2019-04-15 DOI: 10.7591/9781501738753-005

W. Galston

引用次数: 1

3. Rousseau on the Equality of the Sexes 3.卢梭论两性平等

Justice and Equality Here and Now Pub Date : 2019-04-15 DOI: 10.7591/9781501738753-004

A. Bloom

引用次数: 0

7. Equally Endowed with Rights 7. 平等享有权利

Justice and Equality Here and Now Pub Date : 2019-04-15 DOI: 10.7591/9781501738753-008

W. Berns

引用次数: 0

Frontmatter

Justice and Equality Here and Now Pub Date : 2019-04-15 DOI: 10.7591/9781501738753-fm

引用次数: 0

Index 指数

Justice and Equality Here and Now Pub Date : 2019-04-15 DOI: 10.7591/9781501738753-011

引用次数: 0

2. The Nature and Scope of Distributive Justice 2. 分配正义的性质和范围

Justice and Equality Here and Now Pub Date : 2019-04-15 DOI: 10.7591/9781501738753-003

Charles Taylor

{"title":"2. The Nature and Scope of Distributive Justice","authors":"Charles Taylor","doi":"10.7591/9781501738753-003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501738753-003","url":null,"abstract":"A vigorous debate is raging today about the nature of distributive justice. But the controversy concerns not only the criteria or standards of justice, what we would have to do or be to be just; it also touches the issue of what kind of good distributive justice is. Indeed, I would argue that as the debate has progressed, it has become clearer that the solution to the first kind of question presupposes some clarification on the second. In any case, recent extremely interesting works by Michael Walzer and Michael Sandel raise fundamental questions in the second range. I want to take up both issues in this paper. In the first part, I raise questions about the nature of distributive justice. In the second, I want to look at the actual debates about criteria which now divide our societies. First, what kind of good, or mode of right, is distributive justice? Rawls helps us by giving us a formulation of the circumstances of justice: we have separate human beings who are nevertheless collaborating together in conditions of moderate scarcity. This distinguishes it from other kinds and contexts of good. For instance there is a mode of justice which holds between quite independent human beings, not bound together by any society or collaborative arrangement. If two nomadic tribes meet in the desert, very old and long-standing intuitions about justice tell us that it is wrong (unjust) for one to steal the flocks of the other. The principle here is very simple: we have a right to what we have.","PeriodicalId":398707,"journal":{"name":"Justice and Equality Here and Now","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134148739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

1. Injustice, Injury, and Inequality: An Introduction 1. 不公正、伤害与不平等:导论

Justice and Equality Here and Now Pub Date : 2019-04-15 DOI: 10.7591/9781501738753-002

Judith N. Shklar

引用次数: 6