{"title":"Assisted dying reframed in the context of English law’s approach to suicide","authors":"E. Wicks","doi":"10.1177/0968533220982637","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533220982637","url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to reframe the issue of assisted dying in terms of English law’s broader regulation of suicide. It identifies a long-standing ambiguity about the role of the law in respect of suicide, notwithstanding its decriminalisation in the Suicide Act 1961. Reviewing the passage of that Act and subsequent judicial and parliamentary involvement, the article identifies some pertinent unanswered questions such as whether suicide can ever be viewed as a legitimate exercise of autonomy; whether assistance in performing suicide should ever be lawful; and when exactly there is a legal duty on others to intervene to prevent a suicide. It is argued that until such questions are addressed directly in the broader context of suicide, the appropriate legal approach to assisted dying cannot be settled.","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"20 1","pages":"287 - 307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0968533220982637","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45085092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The regulation of midwives in England, c.1500–1902","authors":"S. Fox, M. Brazier","doi":"10.1177/0968533220976174","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533220976174","url":null,"abstract":"Throughout the 19th century, midwives were depicted as incompetent slatterns in both popular imagery and medical literature. We examine how, between 1500 and 1800, midwifery was regulated by a combination of formal licensing by the Church and informal oversight within the community. We argue that episcopal licensing demanded that midwives demonstrate knowledge and competence in midwifery, not only that they were spiritually fit to baptise dying infants. Although episcopal licensing lacked statutory authority, the symbiosis of formal and informal systems of regulation ensured good midwifery practice and midwives were regarded as experts in all matters relating to childbirth. The Midwives Act 1902 introduced statutory regulation of midwives, restoring their ‘professional status’ if in a subordinate role. We show that the history of the regulation of midwives across four centuries casts light on the interplay between formal and informal regulation and matters of gender and professional status.","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"20 1","pages":"308 - 338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0968533220976174","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49317384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Obstruction and obfuscation: Regulatory barriers to human embryo research in New Zealand","authors":"J. Snelling","doi":"10.1177/0968533220984227","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533220984227","url":null,"abstract":"Over the last half-century, significant innovations have occurred in the fields of embryology and human assisted reproduction as a result of human embryo research. This dynamic and ethically complex field is generally subject to extensive regulatory oversight. This article examines New Zealand’s legal framework governing such research. It argues that, despite the core legislative objective of establishing a robust and flexible framework, the current legal regime established under the Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2004 is a classic example of regulatory failure. While not a necessary outcome of the devolved, principles-based regulatory scheme, this failure is primarily due to the perceived lack of authority and independence of the statutory policymaking body established under the Act, as well as the broader regulatory environment in which it operates. It argues that a confluence of problems, including Ministerial overreach as well as a lack of transparency and accountability on the part of decision makers, undermine the legitimacy of the current embryo research policy. This regime not only unjustifiably prevents the conduct of valuable embryo research, but also hinders simple quality improvement practices undertaken in the course of ordinary IVF service provision. This article concludes that, given the significance of embryo research as well as the associated ethical and legal challenges, the issue of embryo research should be remitted back to Parliament to legislate directly as a matter of urgency.","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"20 1","pages":"339 - 367"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0968533220984227","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43925674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Unmasked: A comparative analysis of the physician’s ethical and legal duty to treat during a pandemic","authors":"Cristina Pelkas, M. Boisseau","doi":"10.1177/0968533220967976","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533220967976","url":null,"abstract":"For the first time in over a hundred years, the world faces a devastating pandemic. Millions have been infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV-2 virus and thousands have died. Unprecedented global shortages of protective equipment have resulted in the infection and death of healthcare workers. The legal and ethical duty of a doctor to treat during a pandemic has evolved over time, shaped by legislation and ethical guidance following SARS and the September 11 terrorism attacks. A positive ethical obligation to treat is arguably outweighed by the inability to meet occupational safety standards and high risk of personal harm, in addition to a physician’s competing duties to future patients, their families and colleagues. Nevertheless, individuals who continue working should be acknowledged by society with accessible worker’s compensation, alternative accommodation, hazard pay and student debt forgiveness so that healthcare workers continue to serve patients, answering far beyond the call of duty.","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"20 1","pages":"211 - 229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0968533220967976","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43772890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The legal and policy considerations of transplanting pediatric thymus regulatory T cells as an immunotherapy in Canada","authors":"Blake Murdoch","doi":"10.1177/0968533220963157","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533220963157","url":null,"abstract":"Regulatory T cells (Tregs) hold promise for cell-based therapies for autoimmunity and transplant rejection. In Canada, the potential collection, short-term banking, and transplantation of pediatric Tregs left over from surgery raise legal and policy concerns. Tregs likely fall under the definitions of “tissue” found in most provincial donation and transplantation statutes. With the exception of Alberta’s Human Tissue and Organ Donation Act, the fundamental distinction between donation of tissue primarily for transplantation and secondary donation of by-products of a medical intervention undertaken for the benefit of the donor is inadequately addressed in Canadian law. Most statutes prohibit transplantation except in accordance with their provisions and do not contemplate living donation by minors under a specific age. Provinces could amend their legislation in order to properly enable the transplantation of by-products like Tregs from infant donors. This process is relatively ethically uncontroversial, so if common research ethics and privacy concerns can be addressed, it should likely be permitted.","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"91 1","pages":"201 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0968533220963157","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"65244005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Informed consent to clinical research in India: A private law remedy","authors":"Himani Bhakuni","doi":"10.1177/0968533220958185","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533220958185","url":null,"abstract":"There is a well-established common law doctrine for ascertaining information disclosure in informed consent claims within the treatment context that governs the doctor–patient relationship. But there is no such doctrine in clinical research governing the researcher–participant relationship in India. India, however, is not exceptional in this regard. Common law countries like the United States and Canada at most have sparse, non-systematised, criteria for such cases; arguably, a doctrine for research is at its nascent stage. But the adequacy of the existing criteria for settling informed consent claims in research has hardly ever been discussed. Furthermore, a specific discussion on the applicability of this ‘nascent doctrine’ to India is non-existent. This article discusses both. The article examines case law from India and other common law jurisdictions that hint at developments in this area. It suggests that Indian courts need to move abreast with other jurisdictions to better protect India’s patients and research participants.","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"20 1","pages":"256 - 283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0968533220958185","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43409967","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Homebirthing in the United Kingdom during COVID-19","authors":"E. C. Romanis, Anna Nelson","doi":"10.1177/0968533220955224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533220955224","url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 has significantly impacted all aspects of maternity services in the United Kingdom, exacerbating the fact that choice is insufficiently centred within the maternity regime. In this article, we focus on the restrictions placed on homebirthing services by some National Health Service Trusts in response to the virus. In March 2020, around a third of Trusts implemented blanket policies suspending their entire homebirth service. We argue that the failure to protect choice about place of birth during the pandemic may not only be harmful to birthing people’s physical and mental health, but also that it is legally problematic as it may, in some instances, breach human rights obligations. We also voice concerns about the possibility that in the absence of available homebirthing services people might choose to freebirth. While freebirthing (birthing absent any medical or midwifery support) is not innately problematic, it is concerning that people may feel forced to opt for this.","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"20 1","pages":"183 - 200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0968533220955224","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41382932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Withdrawal of life-prolonging treatment in the face of severely limited resources: Ethical and legal analysis of the law in Israel","authors":"Roy Gilbar, Nili Karako-Eyal","doi":"10.1177/0968533220968868","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533220968868","url":null,"abstract":"The provision of lifesaving treatment subject to severely limited resources can lead to serious moral dilemmas and legal challenges on many levels. The issue becomes particularly acute in a crisis such as the current Covid-19 pandemic. In this context, legal questions arise regarding withdrawal of treatment, particularly withdrawal of ventilation. Israeli law prohibits withdrawal of ventilation, a situation that affects the prioritization criteria for patients who can benefit from ventilation. This issue is discussed in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic where the legal prohibition may lead to a situation in which patients will not have access to ventilators. In addition, a theoretical framework is proposed that includes not only beneficence, nonmaleficence, and distributive justice but also a relational approach to autonomy and justice. We also propose potential solutions under the current legal framework. Based on the legal analysis, it is proposed that Israeli law be amended so that more patients will have access to ventilation during a pandemic. It is argued that clinicians cannot act beneficently to prolong life if they ignore patients’ fundamental rights or the distributional effects of ethical policies. Autonomy and justice and their accompanying liberal and relational perspectives should remain relevant even during a pandemic, a time when resources are scarce.","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"20 1","pages":"230 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0968533220968868","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48486791","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Perspectives on autonomy and advance decision-making: A qualitative study based on older people living with frailty and their carers","authors":"L. Bramley, J. Seymour, K. Cox, J. Samanta","doi":"10.1177/0968533220927440","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533220927440","url":null,"abstract":"The Mental Capacity Act 2005, covering England and Wales, sets out formal tools to extend autonomy past the onset of incapacity that protect an individual’s right to retain autonomy in decision-mak...","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"1 1","pages":"096853322092744"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0968533220927440","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41379225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A global pandemic is not a good time to introduce ‘opt-out’ for organ donation","authors":"J. Parsons, G. Moorlock","doi":"10.1177/0968533220950002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533220950002","url":null,"abstract":"Following several international examples, England introduced a system of deemed consent for organ donation in May 2020. This had been planned for over a year. However, the unprecedented circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic raise issues that make the timing of this change unfortunate. The planned public awareness campaign has thus far been overshadowed by media coverage of the pandemic, and will likely continue to be, creating a situation in which a significant portion of the population may be unaware of having become potential organ donors. Further, the immediate impact of the new policy is likely to be significantly weakened by the suspension of the majority of organ donation and transplant activity. In this article, we first outline the details of the new model introduced in England, before considering the impact of the pandemic on transplantation services. We put forward three ethical reasons why, given the unprecedented circumstances, the change should have been postponed. We argue that (1) COVID-19 dominating headlines will prevent widespread awareness of the change, thereby undermining the autonomy of those who do not wish to be donors; (2) a lack of transplant activity during the pandemic will make the impact of the change difficult to measure; and (3) trust in the new system may be damaged given controversial decisions regarding Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation orders and the allocation of scarce intensive care resources. These reasons combined make for a shaky start at best and present a risk of the new system failing to achieve its desired and essential effect of increasing the number of voluntary organ donors.","PeriodicalId":39602,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law International","volume":"20 1","pages":"155 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0968533220950002","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49314957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}