Journal of International Peacekeeping最新文献_第10页

South-South Cooperation and Training for Peacekeeping Participation 南南合作与参与维和培训

Journal of International Peacekeeping Pub Date : 2017-04-28 DOI: 10.1163/18754112-02103002

Danilo Marcondes, Maíra Siman, R. Oliveira

引用次数: 2

Thinking Regional on Peace Missions in Latin America 拉丁美洲和平使命的区域性思考

Journal of International Peacekeeping Pub Date : 2017-04-28 DOI: 10.1163/18754112-02103001

M. Hirst

引用次数: 3

Managing Expectations: How Have Tensions between the International Community and National Government Impacted the Implementation of Transitional Justice in South Sudan? 管理期望:国际社会与国家政府之间的紧张关系如何影响南苏丹过渡时期司法的实施?

Journal of International Peacekeeping Pub Date : 2017-04-28 DOI: 10.1163/18754112-02103005

Nicholas Vialle

引用次数: 0

Rebuilding the Justice Sector of Afghanistan 重建阿富汗司法部门

Journal of International Peacekeeping Pub Date : 2017-04-28 DOI: 10.1163/18754112-02103004

C. Foley

引用次数: 1

Barriers to Operationalising the “Women, Peace & Security” Doctrine in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations 在联合国维持和平行动中实施“妇女、和平与安全”原则的障碍

Journal of International Peacekeeping Pub Date : 2016-12-08 DOI: 10.1163/18754112-02001005

S. Rimmer

{"title":"Barriers to Operationalising the “Women, Peace & Security” Doctrine in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations","authors":"S. Rimmer","doi":"10.1163/18754112-02001005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18754112-02001005","url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that there are two barriers to operationalising the Women Peace and Security resolutions at the mission level that deserve further attention. The first barrier is that the legal architecture has flaws, and does not seem to be matched with a commensurate political commitment that shapes the high-level UN response at the level of mandate. The second barrier relates to the institutional ability to deliver a peacekeeping mission with gender equality at its heart, related to the capacity of domestic militaries. The article argues that there needs to be deeper thinking about the capabilities of modern militaries to fulfil complex peace operations which contain the imperative for gender sensitive for conflict analysis, planning, security sector reform, disarmament, DDR, and disaster response. The slow progress of gender reform of militaries is hindering credible regulatory responses in UN missions. The article concludes that this creates lingering distrust of military intervention as a tool to protect women and girls, even from conflict-related sexual violence, even in a peace-keeping context.","PeriodicalId":38927,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Peacekeeping","volume":"20 1","pages":"49-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18754112-02001005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64924414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

UN Peacekeeping as the Most Presentable Part of Japan’s 2015 Peace and Security Legislation 联合国维和是日本2015年和平与安全立法中最引人注目的部分

Journal of International Peacekeeping Pub Date : 2016-12-08 DOI: 10.1163/18754112-02001003

T. Toyoda

引用次数: 0

Introduction: Operationalizing Human Rights in Peace Missions 导言:在和平特派团中实施人权

Journal of International Peacekeeping Pub Date : 2016-12-08 DOI: 10.1163/18754112-02001001

C. Michaelsen

引用次数: 0

The Legal Quagmire of Civilian Protection in Peacekeeping under Japan’s New Security Legislation 日本新安保法下维和平民保护的法律困境

Journal of International Peacekeeping Pub Date : 2016-12-08 DOI: 10.1163/18754112-02001004

Hitoshi Nasu

{"title":"The Legal Quagmire of Civilian Protection in Peacekeeping under Japan’s New Security Legislation","authors":"Hitoshi Nasu","doi":"10.1163/18754112-02001004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18754112-02001004","url":null,"abstract":"Japan’s new security legislation, enacted on 30 September 2015 and came into force on 29 March 2016, has expanded the scope in which the Japanese Self-Defence Forces (SDF) personnel can use weapons while engaging in a peacekeeping mission. Among other changes, it authorises the SDF to use weapons in order to protect civilians (civilian protection mandate) or to come to the aid of geographically distant units (“come-to-the-aid” mandate). While this policy itself deserves approbation, its implementation by the SDF in peacekeeping operations under the new security legislation requires careful consideration. This article examines the legal quagmire they will encounter due to the recent jurisprudential development and associated debate regarding the regulation of the use of force in peacekeeping under international law and the circumstances where legal obligations may arise to use force in order to protect civilians. It concludes by suggesting the need for Japan to form its own legal position in relation to each of the debatable legal issues and to develop national rules of engagement for each peacekeeping operation they participate in with a view to effectively communicating its legal position in operational terms to its forces.","PeriodicalId":38927,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Peacekeeping","volume":"20 1","pages":"37-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18754112-02001004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64924592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

The Power of Article 103 of the un Charter on Treaty Obligations: Can the Security Council Authorise Non-Compliance of Human Rights Treaty Obligations in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations? 《联合国宪章》第103条关于条约义务的权力:安全理事会能否授权联合国维持和平行动不遵守人权条约义务?

Journal of International Peacekeeping Pub Date : 2016-12-08 DOI: 10.1163/18754112-02001008

Sophocles Kitharidis

{"title":"The Power of Article 103 of the un Charter on Treaty Obligations: Can the Security Council Authorise Non-Compliance of Human Rights Treaty Obligations in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations?","authors":"Sophocles Kitharidis","doi":"10.1163/18754112-02001008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18754112-02001008","url":null,"abstract":"Understanding Article 103 of the Charter of the United Nations (UN Charter) has proven to be complex and controversial. This provision stipulates that in the event of a conflict, the obligations imposed on UN Member States under the UN Charter prevail over international treaty obligations. Difficulties arise when state parties must determine whether to construe the provision as applying narrowly only to express Charter obligations, or more widely to obligations generated by Charter bodies such as the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). Within the context of UN peacekeeping operations, such operations are mandated by the UNSC. Emphasizing on the respect of the relationship between the UNSC and the UN Charter, Article 25 serves as a specific legal basis for the UNSC’s obligations to respect the provisions of the UN Charter by developing intra vires decisions which are consistent with Charter obligations. State practice therefore presupposes that priority for UNSC resolutions over treaty obligations is provided by Article 103. This article will first analyse Article 103 and in doing so, it will examine the obligations that the UNSC can impose on states. This will include a consideration of when UNSC mandated peacekeeping operations can, by their nature, contravene international human rights treaty obligations. It will then discuss the impact on peacekeeping operations on the presumption of complying with human rights obligations, including the right to life, freedom from torture and the right to liberty and security. Finally, this article will offer a critique of the capacity of Article 103 to override human rights obligations through the UNSC interpretation of ‘all means necessary’ in peacekeeping operations.","PeriodicalId":38927,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Peacekeeping","volume":"20 1","pages":"111-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18754112-02001008","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"64925138","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Reforming UN peace operations: Will the high-level panel’s report make a difference for human rights? 改革联合国和平行动:高级别小组的报告会对人权产生影响吗?

Journal of International Peacekeeping Pub Date : 2016-12-08 DOI: 10.1163/18754112-02001002

Jeni Whalan

引用次数: 0