Foucault Studies最新文献_第2页

Editorial 编辑

Foucault Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-29 DOI: 10.22439/fs.vi33.6807

Sverre Raffnsøe et al.

引用次数: 0

Philosophy From the texture of Everyday Life: The Critical-Analytic Methods of Foucault and J. L. Austin 从日常生活的肌理看哲学：福柯和奥斯汀的批判分析方法

Foucault Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-29 DOI: 10.22439/fs.vi33.6802

J. L. Austin, Jasper Friedrich

{"title":"Philosophy From the texture of Everyday Life: The Critical-Analytic Methods of Foucault and J. L. Austin","authors":"J. L. Austin, Jasper Friedrich","doi":"10.22439/fs.vi33.6802","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.vi33.6802","url":null,"abstract":"In a 1978 lecture in Tokyo, Foucault drew a comparison between his own philosophical methodology and that of ‘Anglo-Saxon analytic philosophy’, claiming the label ‘analytic philosophy of politics’ for his own approach. This may seem like a somewhat surprising comparison given the gulf between contemporary analytic and continental philosophy, but I argue that it is a very productive one which indeed might help us reconsider this gulf. I proceed through a comparison between Foucault and the speech act theory of J. L. Austin, one of the analytic philosophers Foucault had in mind in his Tokyo lecture. By focusing on the methodological commonalities between Foucault and Austin, this article identifies the core of a philosophical methodology that cuts across the analytic/continental divide in philosophy in general while constituting a powerful alternative to the methods applied by analytic political philosophers specifically. This approach, which I term ‘analytic critique’, is one that starts from a critical analysis of what happens in ordinary lived experience and ‘bottom-up’ in an avowedly politically engaged way – thereby challenging the conceptual and political aloofness of contemporary political philosophy in the liberal-Rawlsian tradition. Foucault’s appropriation of the label ‘analytic philosophy’, it is argued, ought to function as a call to more imaginative methodological-theoretical engagement across the traditional division between continental and analytic approaches.","PeriodicalId":38873,"journal":{"name":"Foucault Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48052994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Niki Kasumi Clements, Sites of the Ascetic Self: John Cassian and Christian Ethi-cal Formation. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2020. Pp. 280. 尼克·卡苏米·克莱门茨，《苦行自我的场所:约翰·卡西安和基督教伦理道德的形成》。印第安纳州圣母大学:圣母大学出版社，2020年。280页。

Foucault Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-11 DOI: 10.22439/fs.vi32.6708

Will Tilleczek

引用次数: 0

Stuart Elden, The Early Foucault. Cambridge: Polity, 2021. Pp. 281. 斯图尔特·埃尔登，《早期福柯》。剑桥：Polity，2021。第281页。

Foucault Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-11 DOI: 10.22439/fs.vi32.6711

Jasper Friedrich

引用次数: 0

Askesis and Critique: Foucault and Benjamin Askesis与批评家：福柯与本雅明

Foucault Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-11 DOI: 10.22439/fs.vi32.6702

O. Rotlevy

{"title":"Askesis and Critique: Foucault and Benjamin","authors":"O. Rotlevy","doi":"10.22439/fs.vi32.6702","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.vi32.6702","url":null,"abstract":"While Foucault referred to Benjamin just once in his entire corpus, scholars have long noticed affinities between the two thinkers, mainly between their conceptions of history: their emphasis on discontinuity, their historiographical practices, and the role of archives in their work. This essay focuses, rather, on their practice of critique and, more specifically, on their conception of the relation of this practice to exercise or askesis. I examine the role of askesis as a self-transformative exercise in Foucault’s late work and how this concept reverberates throughout his idea of critique as the exercise of an ethos demanding arduous work. Against this background, the role of exercise (Übung) in Benjamin’s Origin of the German Traeurspiel, his interest in ascetic kinds of exercise or schooling, and its ties to critique are discerned. This comparison reveals significant similarities in Foucault’s and Benjamin’s conception of philosophy, as well as different emphases in their inheritance of the Kantian critical project: critique as an exercise of an attitude attentive to possibilities for transformation in the present vs. critique as involving an attitude-transforming exercise; critique as a modern ethos that needs to be reactivated vs. critique as propaedeutic, as a preparation for a modern tradition.","PeriodicalId":38873,"journal":{"name":"Foucault Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48113051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Chloë Taylor, Foucault, Feminism and Sex Crimes: An Anti-Carceral Analysis. New York, and London: Routledge, 2019. Pp. 272. ChloëTaylor，福柯，女权主义与性犯罪：反尸体分析。纽约和伦敦：Routledge，2019。第272页。

Foucault Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-11 DOI: 10.22439/fs.vi32.6704

Kurt Borg

引用次数: 0

UK Lockdown Governmentalities: What Does It Mean to Govern in 2020? 英国封锁政府：2020年的政府意味着什么？

Foucault Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-11 DOI: 10.22439/fs.vi32.6703

Seb Sander

{"title":"UK Lockdown Governmentalities: What Does It Mean to Govern in 2020?","authors":"Seb Sander","doi":"10.22439/fs.vi32.6703","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.vi32.6703","url":null,"abstract":"Focusing on the United Kingdom, this paper examines the mechanisms of 2020’s ‘lockdown’ strategy from a governmental perspective, with ‘governmentality’ being defined as the art of, or rationale behind, governing populations at a given time. By investigating a series of recent imperatives given to the population by the UK government, and comparing these with the previously dominant form of governmentality (neoliberalism), I hope to shed light on some new features of the current art of government. Indeed, the paper argues that neoliberalism is no longer the dominant form of governmentality in the UK, although some important legacies remain. I therefore argue that new forms of governmentality have risen to prominence. In particular, I use the concept of ‘algorithmic governmentality’ to address features of lockdown subjectivity and economy, such as the ‘doppelgänger logic’ of consumption and production, as well as the government’s attempts to continuously manage and re-manage the population based on biometric data. However, I also show that this concept does not adequately encompass contemporary realities of surveillance, exposition and coercion. As such, I introduce ‘instrumentarian governmentality’ to denote the use of digital surveillance instruments to control the behaviour of the population. Additionally, the term is intended to denote an ‘authoritarian’ turn in the ways in which people are governed. Overall, what it means to govern in 2020 is posited as a fluctuating composite of three key forms of governmentality: neoliberal, algorithmic, and instrumentarian.","PeriodicalId":38873,"journal":{"name":"Foucault Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49202997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Editorial 编辑

Foucault Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-11 DOI: 10.22439/fs.vi32.6713

Sverre Raffnsøe

引用次数: 0

Paul Allen Miller, Foucault’s Seminars on Antiquity: Learning to Speak the Truth. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021. Pp. 232. 保罗·艾伦·米勒，《福柯的古代研讨会:学会说真话》伦敦:布鲁姆斯伯里学术出版社，2021。232页。

Foucault Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-11 DOI: 10.22439/fs.vi32.6710

Toon Meijaard

引用次数: 0

Cory Wimberly, How Propaganda Became Public Relations: Foucault and the Corporate Government of the Public. Routledge: New York, 2020. Pp. 214. 科里·温贝里，《宣传如何成为公共关系：福柯与公众的企业政府》。劳特利奇：纽约，2020年。第214页。

Foucault Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-11 DOI: 10.22439/fs.vi32.6707

Fabio Cescon

引用次数: 1