History of Economic Ideas最新文献_第10页

Destructive Behaviour: Economics and Literature 破坏性行为:经济学与文学

History of Economic Ideas Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI: 10.1400/54092

B. Ingrao

引用次数: 0

The Logic of Experimental Discovery 实验发现的逻辑

History of Economic Ideas Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI: 10.1400/54094

Ivan Moscati

引用次数: 3

Two Arguments for Basic Income : Thomas Paine (1737-1809) and Thomas Spence (1750-1814) 基本收入的两个论点:托马斯·潘恩(1737-1809)和托马斯·斯宾塞(1750-1814)

History of Economic Ideas Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI: 10.1400/54091

J. King, J. Marangos

引用次数: 20

Jean- Baptiste Say: the project "For a monetary reform in David Ricardo's style" Jean- Baptiste Say:“大卫·李嘉图风格的货币改革”项目

History of Economic Ideas Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI: 10.1400/77645

A. Tiran

引用次数: 2

How (not) to Shed Light on the Experiment in Economics 如何(不)阐明经济学实验

History of Economic Ideas Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI: 10.1400/54095

Kyu Sang Lee

引用次数: 0

Wicksell's Two Real Cumulative Processes Described a Real Cycle 威克塞尔的两个真实的累积过程描述了一个真实的循环

History of Economic Ideas Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI: 10.1400/77646

Michael J. Gootzeit

{"title":"Wicksell's Two Real Cumulative Processes Described a Real Cycle","authors":"Michael J. Gootzeit","doi":"10.1400/77646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1400/77646","url":null,"abstract":"Wicksell’s cumulative process (CP) was a ‘real’, not simply a monetary theory. Interest and Prices and later writings described two CP’S, one with constant real income, the cumulative inflationary process (CIP) and one with falling real income, the cumulative deflationary process (CDP). But, they both, not just the latter, should be regarded as part of a real cycle theory. Most interpreters, neglecting the cdp, emphasized only increases in the price level or the rate of inflation for the CIP, as a purely monetary process. But, it also involved changing industrial realignment and income distribution between simultaneously expanding and contracting sectors, thus making the apparent price cycle real. An added implication was that welfare would worsen, as competition for expected increased profits caused some firms in the expanding sectors to be more successful than others, the idea of the ‘super-entrepreneur.’ The cdp eliminated the ‘center stage’ assumption of full employment and was even more clearly a real (downward) cycle. Followers of Wicksell also emphasized the CP when trying to explain the fluctuations of the 1920’s and 30’s and developed it into more of a real cycle theory with changing relative prices.","PeriodicalId":38602,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Ideas","volume":"14 1","pages":"1000-1027"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66638508","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Devaluation Controversy in Eighteenth-Century Italy 18世纪意大利货币贬值之争

History of Economic Ideas Pub Date : 2005-12-01 DOI: 10.1400/18550

K. Stapelbroek

引用次数: 4

Classical Macroeconomics: Correcting Some Misrepresentations in Gootzeit's Review Article 古典宏观经济学:纠正谷歌评论文章中的一些错误表述

History of Economic Ideas Pub Date : 2005-01-01 DOI: 10.1400/18554

James C. W. Ahiakpor

引用次数: 1

On 'Local Styles' of Political Economy: The Italian Case (1850-1930) 政治经济学的“地方风格”:意大利案例(1850-1930)

History of Economic Ideas Pub Date : 2005-01-01 DOI: 10.1400/18538

N. Bellanca

{"title":"On 'Local Styles' of Political Economy: The Italian Case (1850-1930)","authors":"N. Bellanca","doi":"10.1400/18538","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1400/18538","url":null,"abstract":"We focus on a ‘local style’ of political economy in Italy, not in order to compare the characteristics of scholars of economics from different national backgrounds, but rather to address the actual ways in which the profession of the economist was conceived and practised in a place that represented an important cultural setting and during a period when a number of highly problematic issues were raised. Between 1850 and 1930, the predominant Italian approach to economic science would start out from synthetic premises valid for specific actual situations ; the emphasis thus turned away from the methodological precepts of the classical and neoclassical period, which held that it is necessary to start out from self-evident analytical premises. Scientific knowledge does not aspire to formulate laws ; instead, it proceeds to identification of causal mechanisms. While laws are universally valid if and only if the (usually fictitious and unrealistic) conditions from which they are derived are effectively realised, the causal mechanisms sometimes come into operation but sometimes do not. The interaction between synthetic premises, which are valid universally for specific contexts, and causal mechanisms, valid indeterminately for many contexts, gives shape to a scientific style. The exponents of this style accept a common ‘box of mechanisms’, but clash vehemently concerning the premises to be adopted and the visions such premises evoke.","PeriodicalId":38602,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Ideas","volume":"13 1","pages":"79-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66614842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Rejoinder to James Ahiakpor's Reply to My Review of His Book : "Classical Macroeconomics" 对詹姆斯·亚哈波对我评论他的著作《古典宏观经济学》的回复的回应

History of Economic Ideas Pub Date : 2005-01-01 DOI: 10.1400/18555

Michale J. Gootzeit

{"title":"Rejoinder to James Ahiakpor's Reply to My Review of His Book : \"Classical Macroeconomics\"","authors":"Michale J. Gootzeit","doi":"10.1400/18555","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1400/18555","url":null,"abstract":"First, I want to say that I think that much of the material in Ahiakpor's (A's) book is well worth saying, because it makes one focus on much of the value of classical macro that has been forgotten or neglected in these modern times, especially in Principle's books, but also in more advanced writings. I especially liked the article, which fo cused on the idea that Keynes' falsely attributed the assumption of full employment to the classicalists. There is no question that this assump tion is not made everywhere and uniformly in the classical writings. This book and A's writings in general, as indicated by the book's contents, have focused on the general topic of emphasizing what is right about classical macro and what is wrong with macro directly after the Keynesian reformulation in the 1920s through 1950s, which has in general carried forth into modern undergraduate books. The general problem that I see is a matter of emphasis. A believes that the classical writers (including the Marshall's) have stated a system that is well-nigh complete, with almost all possible cases included that Key nes and his followers included later, but without any substantial im provement. In fact, this more modern group's so-called improvement of classical ideas was downright wrong in many cases or so confused the economic language, that the definition of such a basic concept as 'capital' was hopelessly misinterpreted and has continued so. I believe that for the period (1770S-1870S), classical macro was a brilliant invention that continues to be a fruitful way to look at the world, but since that world has become so much more complicated, especially the monetary system, it serves no useful purpose to con tinue to dwell on the letter of these ideas; their spirit seems enough. So, attempting to defend literally the classical interpretation of basic macro concepts may be regarded as 'reactionary', and no economist should wish to be accused of this. It is fine to reinterpret the classical ideas and this is what the best part of A's book does well, but to insist","PeriodicalId":38602,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Ideas","volume":"13 1","pages":"1000-1004"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"66615351","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0