Perilous Futures最新文献

{"title":"4. Revolutionary War and Absolute Enemy: Rereading Theory of the Partisan","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/9781501730665-007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501730665-007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":382783,"journal":{"name":"Perilous Futures","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128353705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Acknowledgments","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9781501730665-001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501730665-001","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":382783,"journal":{"name":"Perilous Futures","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130740751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"2. Transition: The Concept of Großraum and Global Politics","authors":"","doi":"10.7591/9781501730665-005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501730665-005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":382783,"journal":{"name":"Perilous Futures","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124321043","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Return of Political Theology","authors":"P. U. Hohendahl","doi":"10.7591/CORNELL/9781501726545.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/CORNELL/9781501726545.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"The fifth chapter goes back to Schmitt’s 1922 Political Theology to frame the author’s late return to this theme. The chapter argues that this return underscores the centrality of political theology for Schmitt’s late work in general. It means to show that Schmitt in his debate with the theologian Erik Peterson and the philosopher Hans Blumenberg in Political Theology II emphasizes the need for theological foundations. They can be found in the New Testament. As a consequence, he stresses the continued relevance of political theology.","PeriodicalId":382783,"journal":{"name":"Perilous Futures","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124392592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Final Reflections","authors":"P. U. Hohendahl","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501726545.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501726545.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"The last chapter discusses the present state of Schmitt research and the relevance of his work for political and legal theory. The chapter traces the changes of Schmitt’s reception in the West from the 1990s until the present, giving a critical account especially of the normalization of Schmitt’s late work after 2000 in the context of a new geopolitical approach to a globalized political order. The discussion closes on a sceptical note.","PeriodicalId":382783,"journal":{"name":"Perilous Futures","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115808585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Revolutionary War and Absolute Enemy","authors":"P. U. Hohendahl","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501726545.003.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501726545.003.0005","url":null,"abstract":"The fourth chapter refers to a historical situation defined by Schmitt as the stage of global civil war. It examines Schmitt’s understanding of the history of irregular warfare, especially of the conflicts that spread after World War II in response to liberation movements and social revolutions in third-world countries. The reading stresses the conflicted sympathies of Schmitt’s theoretical intervention: his defence of late European colonialism on the one hand and his empathy for the logic of revolutionary wars, resulting in the figure of the absolute enemy. In this context the theological horizon of civil war is addressed as well.","PeriodicalId":382783,"journal":{"name":"Perilous Futures","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134045404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Fate of European Colonialism and Carl Schmitt’s New World Order","authors":"P. U. Hohendahl","doi":"10.7591/cornell/9781501726545.003.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501726545.003.0004","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on The Nomos of the Earth, offering a comparative reading of Schmitt’s conception of European colonialism and more recent critical studies of the relevance of colonialism for the emergence of modern global history. In particular, the analysis contrasts Schmitt’s framing of colonialism as a crucial positive moment of modern history with a fundamental critique developed by liberation movements after World War II (Fanon). This analysis leads up to a discussion of recent affirmations of western imperialism in which Schmitt’s ideas seem to return.","PeriodicalId":382783,"journal":{"name":"Perilous Futures","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124371985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"5. The Return of Political Theology","authors":"Joshua D. Hawley","doi":"10.7591/9781501730665-008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501730665-008","url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION There was a time when theology was called the \"queen of the sciences.\" From the beginnings of the university in the High Middle Ages through the nineteenth century, theology formed the backbone of liberal instruction at institutions of higher learning. Those days are long past. What remains of theological investigation in most major American universities has been transposed into the study of religion and safely sequestered in \"religious studies\" departments. Few undergraduates today encounter theology as a discipline--and as for law students, well, the idea that theology might have some relevance for the study of law is regarded in the legal academy as either quaint or worse, vaguely menacing. And yet. The last two decades have brought surging interest in the field called law and religion; religious liberty has become a subject of major doctrinal concern; and one of the most important books published by a legal academic in the past four years was a work of political theology. (1) These stirrings in the legal world have been matched by a renewed interest among theologians in politics and the law. For evidence of that, consider the recent publication of one of the more ambitious studies in biblical theology of the last three decades, N.T. Wright's Paul and the Faithfulness of God. (2) Wright is an English theologian of some acclaim. A prolific writer, he counts more than sixty titles to his credit, and his latest is the fourth installment in a series investigating New Testament history and theology. Wright's work has canvassed such subjects as the \"historical Jesus\" and first-century Christianity, but he considers himself principally a scholar of the Apostle Paul. (3) His most recent volume is a sweeping study of Paul's theology, including, importantly, Paul's political theology. Running over fifteen hundred pages in length and divided into two books, Paul and the Faithfulness of God painstakingly reconstructs Paul's historical context and intellectual influences on the way to a thorough restatement of Paul's thought. The volume concludes with a multichapter examination of what Pauline theology means for Paul's day and ours, with politics front and center. The book has proven a minor sensation in the world of biblical studies. But why should lawyers care? The answer has to do with what Mark Lilia has recently and rather famously called \"the Great Separation.\" (4) Lilia's claim is that liberalism and limited, constitutional government are possible only when religion is firmly quarantined from the business of politics. (5) \"[I]ndividual rights to private and collective worship, freedom of conscience, religious toleration\"--all these were the fruits of banishing religion from the public sphere, he says. (6) By his account, modernity itself emerged from this great separation. The idea is hardly novel. It has been in vogue in the western world since at least the Enlightenment. Listen closely in contemporary America and you will hear it just","PeriodicalId":382783,"journal":{"name":"Perilous Futures","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133707259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}