Open Justice最新文献

Open Justice in Modern Societies: What Role for Courts? 现代社会的公开司法:法院的角色是什么?

Open Justice Pub Date : 2019-03-07 DOI: 10.5771/9783845297620-9

B. Hess, Anamaría Harvey

引用次数: 2

Open Justice Pub Date : 2019-03-07 DOI: 10.5771/9783845297620-125

Sir Ernest Ryder

引用次数: 2

The Functions of Publicity and of Privatization in Courts and Their Replacements (from Jeremy Bentham to #MeToo and Google Spain) 公共性和私人化在法院中的功能及其替代(从边沁到#MeToo和谷歌西班牙)

Open Justice Pub Date : 2018-10-22 DOI: 10.5771/9783845297620-177

J. Resnik

{"title":"The Functions of Publicity and of Privatization in Courts and Their Replacements (from Jeremy Bentham to #MeToo and Google Spain)","authors":"J. Resnik","doi":"10.5771/9783845297620-177","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845297620-177","url":null,"abstract":"Jeremy Bentham theorized the disciplinary, educative, and evaluative utilities of public adjudication, in which third parties can observe and critique the proceedings. Constitutions around the world have applied those ideas through mandates for ‘open courts’ and ‘fair hearings,’ albeit translated in practice in diverse ways. \u0000The contemporary #MeToo movement has deployed Bentham’s ‘publicity principle’ by using twenty-first century technologies to challenge institutions for failing to sanction sexual predators. The web has thus provided a function akin to what courts do—disseminating information and imposing discipline. These new technologies, enabling ‘online dispute resolution’ (ODR), augment efforts styled alternative dispute resolution (ADR) to transform courts or to route legal disputes to conclusions without courts. Neither ODR nor ADR, based in or out of courts, routinely builds in mechanisms for third-party access to processes or outcomes. \u0000Ready access to information is not, however, an unmitigated good, as reflected in a new right ‘to be forgotten’ that eliminates materials from the web through decisions by a private adjudicator—Google. This chapter explores the impetus for reforming courts, the repeat players promoting new procedures, the challenges of regulating both process and information, and the fragility of commitments to state-provided public adjudication in which third parties are recognized as authorized to observe and critique.","PeriodicalId":378271,"journal":{"name":"Open Justice","volume":"27 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116346175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Transparency in the Selection of Constitutional Court Judges: Contextualised Comparison between the USA, Germany and the European Courts in Luxembourg and Strasbourg 宪法法院法官遴选的透明度:美国、德国与卢森堡和斯特拉斯堡欧洲法院的背景比较

Open Justice Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783845297620-143

T. Giegerich

引用次数: 0

The Dilemma of Open Justice in the Present Political, Social and Cultural Climate 当前政治、社会、文化环境下公开司法的困境

Open Justice Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783845297620-117

R. Herz

引用次数: 0

Public Hearings in Civil Proceedings: From the Perspective of a Luxembourgish Judge 民事诉讼中的公开听证:一个卢森堡法官的视角

Open Justice Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.5771/9783845297620-97

Jean-Claude Wiwinius