发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Journal of Media Law最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
False havens: assessing new developments in the libel tourism debate 虚假庇护所：评估诽谤旅游辩论的新进展
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2019.1679425
John A. Larkin
{"title":"False havens: assessing new developments in the libel tourism debate","authors":"John A. Larkin","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2019.1679425","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2019.1679425","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Libel tourism is the phenomenon whereby litigants issue libel claims in inappropriate fora in order to avail themselves of the pro-claimant laws therein. For years, London held the reputation as the global capital for libel tourism. However, following controversy in this area in the 2000s and passage of both the US SPEECH Act and Defamation Act 2013, the debate surrounding the libel tourism has taken several new directions. Many commentators now wonder whether libel tourists, deprived of a haven in London, will flock to fora with more pro-claimant regimes. Others go further, suggesting that libel tourism has the potential to flare up once more in England and that the 2013 Act leaves the door open to libel tourists. Some scholars have even asserted that such is the danger, an international convention must be established to ensure that the blight of libel tourism is finally slain. This article investigates how realistic and desirable these new developments in the debate are.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2019.1679425","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42707068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The duty of care in the Online Harms White Paper 网络危害白皮书中的注意义务
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2019.1668605
L. Woods
{"title":"The duty of care in the Online Harms White Paper","authors":"L. Woods","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2019.1668605","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2019.1668605","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article considers the approach taken by the Online Harms White Paper to constructing a statutory duty of care and argues that while not explicit the approach taken is consistent with a ‘by design’ approach.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2019.1668605","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48756059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Revise and resubmit? Reviewing the 2019 Online Harms White Paper 修改并重新提交?审查2019年网络危害白皮书
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2019.1666475
Victoria Nash
{"title":"Revise and resubmit? Reviewing the 2019 Online Harms White Paper","authors":"Victoria Nash","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2019.1666475","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2019.1666475","url":null,"abstract":"As the 2019 Online Harms White Paper (OHWP) notes, the Internet is an increasingly integral part of our lives, and can offer ‘significant benefits’.1 In order to ensure these benefits are not under...","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2019.1666475","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43539890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
The differentiated duty of care: a response to the Online Harms White Paper 差别注意义务:对《网络危害白皮书》的回应
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2019.1666488
Damian Tambini
{"title":"The differentiated duty of care: a response to the Online Harms White Paper","authors":"Damian Tambini","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2019.1666488","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2019.1666488","url":null,"abstract":"A consensus has formed that the negative social externalities of online harms combined with huge market power of internet intermediaries justify regulation of online service providers.1 Fake news, ...","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2019.1666488","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41943361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Introduction 介绍
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2019.1670445
J. Rowbottom
{"title":"Introduction","authors":"J. Rowbottom","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2019.1670445","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2019.1670445","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2019.1670445","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47269668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Online Harms White Paper: comparing the UK and German approaches to regulation* 网络危害白皮书：英国和德国监管方法的比较*
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2019.1666476
S. Theil
{"title":"The Online Harms White Paper: comparing the UK and German approaches to regulation*","authors":"S. Theil","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2019.1666476","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2019.1666476","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The internet has revolutionised our ability to communicate and connect across historic social, political and geographic divides. Where previously gatekeepers mitigated and negotiated access to mass media platforms, today potentially anyone – and any content – can reach millions of users in an instant. This development bears great opportunities for the democratisation of expression and the diversification of public discourse but has likewise broadened the impact of harm caused online. This raises the question how platforms and services can be regulated effectively to combat online harms without jeopardising free and open discourse. The paper explores the Online Harms White Paper published by the UK Government earlier this year and compares its regulatory approach with the infamous German Network Enforcement Law.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2019.1666476","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47914720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Censored: a literary history of subversion and control 审查:一部颠覆和控制的文学史
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2019-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2019.1653540
E. Barendt
{"title":"Censored: a literary history of subversion and control","authors":"E. Barendt","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2019.1653540","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2019.1653540","url":null,"abstract":"This stimulating book has a broad historical scope. Its 25 chapters cover censorship from the suppression in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries of translations of the Bible to the removal of boo...","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2019.1653540","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44785918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reporting police investigations, privacy rights and social stigma: Richard v BBC 报道警方调查、隐私权和社会污名：Richard诉BBC
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2018-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2019.1582134
J. Rowbottom
{"title":"Reporting police investigations, privacy rights and social stigma: Richard v BBC","authors":"J. Rowbottom","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2019.1582134","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2019.1582134","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In Richard v BBC, a media report revealing that the police were investigating a person in relation to alleged historic sex offence was found to violate the claimant’s expectation of privacy. The ruling is important in drawing new boundaries on what can be reported in relation to criminal investigations. This article examines the decision and considers its relationship with other areas of law. In particular, the decision showed an overlap with defamation in so far as injury to reputation was central to the claim. More broadly, the law of privacy can now limit the publication of information about prior convictions, suggesting greater protection is now offered for personal information relating to the criminal justice system.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2019.1582134","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49109181","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Protecting Europe’s content production from US giants 保护欧洲的内容制作不受美国巨头的影响
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2018-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2019.1579296
Sally Broughton Micova, Felix Hempel, Sabine Jacques
{"title":"Protecting Europe’s content production from US giants","authors":"Sally Broughton Micova, Felix Hempel, Sabine Jacques","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2019.1579296","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2019.1579296","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article investigates and compares the changes to both the Audiovisual Media Services Directive and the Copyright Directive, through which European Union policymakers have sought to protect European content producers, mainly in the face of competition from US-based platforms. Contributing to debates about platform and content regulation, we examine the approaches taken with these two legislative changes and assess the potential for success of the most recent efforts. Ultimately, we argue that if revised as proposed the Copyright Directive runs the risk of further adding to the imbalance of power between press publishers and online platforms, and that the level playing field approach taken in the AVSMD revision is more likely to be at least somewhat effective in addressing that imbalance.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2019.1579296","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45155976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Safeguarding the South African public broadcaster: governance, civil society and the SABC 维护南非公共广播公司:治理、民间社会和南非广播公司
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2018-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2018.1592284
V. Bronstein, Judith Katzew
{"title":"Safeguarding the South African public broadcaster: governance, civil society and the SABC","authors":"V. Bronstein, Judith Katzew","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2018.1592284","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2018.1592284","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The South African public broadcaster, the SABC has faced serious threats to its independence. The ruling African National Congress has been the dominant political party since South Africa’s first democratic elections and factional battles have played out in the SABC from time to time. President Zuma and the Minister of Communications visibly took control of the SABC through Hlaudi Motsoeneng, the Chief Operations Officer between 2011 and 2017. This article examines the mechanisms and processes that allowed institutional safeguards intended to guard the autonomy and independence of the SABC to be subverted. The incorporation of the SABC as a company accounts for some of its vulnerability. Although good institutional and governance structures are important for any public broadcaster, they cannot protect the institution on their own. Vocal political support for independent public broadcasting crossed frontiers of race, class and politics. This support accounts for the resilience of the SABC.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2018.1592284","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46069718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信