发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Journal of Media Law最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
The ‘right to be forgotten’ beyond the EU: an analysis of wider G20 regulatory action and potential next steps 欧盟之外的“被遗忘权”：对20国集团更广泛监管行动和潜在下一步行动的分析
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2021.1884947
D. Erdos
{"title":"The ‘right to be forgotten’ beyond the EU: an analysis of wider G20 regulatory action and potential next steps","authors":"D. Erdos","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2021.1884947","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2021.1884947","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It has been increasingly asserted that data protection can and should enable individuals to exert some control at least ex post over online data dissemination. Notwithstanding contrary suggestions, therefore, the ‘right to be forgotten’ is not solely an EU phenomenon. Post-2014 the majority of the eight national Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) s operating in non-EU G20 jurisdictions with established data protection legislation have sought to implement such a right through guidance and, in three cases, also enforcement. These jurisdictions span three regions and encompass jurisdictions such as Australia and Canada with a similar outlook to the EU. In light of the profoundly globalised nature of the internet, greater transnational coordination would be valuable. Whilst the G20 is itself ill-suited to this task, the pan-regional Data Protection Convention framework overseen by the Council of Europe as well as the Global Privacy Assembly could play an important role.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2021.1884947","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46020594","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
The impact of the image on personal life: is current law out of focus? 形象对个人生活的影响:现行法律是否偏离了焦点?
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2021.1933704
Holly Hancock
{"title":"The impact of the image on personal life: is current law out of focus?","authors":"Holly Hancock","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2021.1933704","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2021.1933704","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Drawing upon empirical research carried out by the author, this paper demonstrates that the current law in England and Wales on privacy fails to provide appropriate recourse for a person who feels aggrieved at their photograph being taken and shared, particularly where this evokes emotions of embarrassment or humiliation. Whilst some improvements to the current law are discussed to improve protection for the photographed's privacy rights, the main conclusion suggests that a greater focus on education and guidance would be a pragmatic and cost-effective solution, with this shift in emphasis concentrating efforts on the actions of the photographer. In turn, this would protect the interests of the photographed as a form of preventative measure, rather than reactionary move.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2021.1933704","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"60423356","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
The Australian News Media Bargaining Code: lessons for the UK, EU and beyond 澳大利亚新闻媒体谈判准则：英国、欧盟及其他国家的经验教训
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2021.1963585
Karen Lee, S. Molitorisz
{"title":"The Australian News Media Bargaining Code: lessons for the UK, EU and beyond","authors":"Karen Lee, S. Molitorisz","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2021.1963585","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2021.1963585","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In February 2021, following sustained brinkmanship from Google and Facebook, Australia passed into law its world-first 'News Media Bargaining Code' (Code), which seeks to address the bargaining imbalance between digital platforms and news media. Already, some have judged the Code to be a success, with other countries now considering implementing similar policy responses. In this analysis article, we highlight that while the Code is a largely welcome initiative, other jurisdictions need to be mindful of its weaknesses and the difficulties they are likely to encounter when attempting to secure passage of analogous legislation.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45386466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
The post-editorial control era: how EU media law matches platforms’ organisational control with cooperative responsibility 后编辑控制时代:欧盟媒体法如何将平台的组织控制与合作责任相匹配
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2020.1796067
M. V. van Drunen
{"title":"The post-editorial control era: how EU media law matches platforms’ organisational control with cooperative responsibility","authors":"M. V. van Drunen","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2020.1796067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2020.1796067","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper argues the AVMSD attaches cooperative responsibility to platforms’ organisational control. Firstly, it explores how the new concept of organisational control differs from the editorial control that has traditionally been central to media law, in particular concerning the greater involvement of other stakeholders active on platforms. Secondly, it analyses the measures the AVMSD requires platforms to take with regard to content on their service in light of their organisational control. Finally, it shows how the AVMSD not only requires platforms to assume responsibility for actions under their direct control, but also to enable users and uploaders to exercise their inherent influence differently. The AVMSD consequently moves away from centralised, and towards cooperative responsibility for platforms. The paper concludes by evaluating the choices the AVMSD makes (and fails to make) in the operationalisation of this new responsibility model.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2020.1796067","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46138150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
The journalism exception in UK data protection law 英国数据保护法中的新闻例外
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2020.1843326
Benjamin Wong
{"title":"The journalism exception in UK data protection law","authors":"Benjamin Wong","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2020.1843326","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2020.1843326","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article addresses the application of the journalism exception in UK data protection law. A number of uncertainties arise out of the case law of the CJEU and UK courts, as well as from the changes made to the journalism exception in the new data protection regime under the GDPR and DPA 2018. Three areas within the journalism exception will be discussed: the meaning of ‘journalistic purposes’, the substantive exemption from liability, and the procedural power to obtain a stay of proceedings. This article will identify the uncertainties affecting each of these three areas, and proposes possible ways by which these uncertainties may be resolved.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2020.1843326","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42063968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Too much drama defining film in UK copyright law 英国版权法中定义戏剧的电影太多
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2020.1831141
C. Paul Sellors
{"title":"Too much drama defining film in UK copyright law","authors":"C. Paul Sellors","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2020.1831141","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2020.1831141","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In Norowzian v Arks Ltd. (No.2) the Court of Appeal determined that the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 protects films as dramatic works. What, conceptually and in practice, this means is not clear. This article examines and compares the history of film with the definitions of film in the Berne Convention and UK copyright laws to argue that practical and legal definitions of film were already diverging when the Copyright Act 1911 was enacted. It contends the continuing divergence between film and its legal classification in copyright law develops from the underscoring aesthetic theory on which classifications from the 1911 Act onwards depend. Establishing the classifications in CDPA 1988 on an alternative aesthetic theory could better accommodate filmic expression.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2020.1831141","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45229322","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From journalistic ethics to fact-checking practices: defining the standards of content governance in the fight against disinformation 从新闻伦理到事实核查实践:定义打击虚假信息的内容治理标准
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2020.1869486
P. Cavaliere
{"title":"From journalistic ethics to fact-checking practices: defining the standards of content governance in the fight against disinformation","authors":"P. Cavaliere","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2020.1869486","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2020.1869486","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article claims that the practices undertaken by digital platforms to counter disinformation, under the EU Action Plan against Disinformation and the Code of Practice, mark a shift in the governance of news media content. While professional journalism standards have been used for long, both within and outside the industry, to assess the accuracy of news content and adjudicate on media conduct, the platforms are now resolving to different fact-checking routines to moderate and curate their content. The article will demonstrate how fact-checking organisations have different working methods than news operators and ultimately understand and assess ‘accuracy’ in different ways. As a result, this new and enhanced role for platforms and fact-checkers as curators of content impacts on how content is distributed to the audience and, thus, on media freedom. Depending on how the fact-checking standards and working routines will consolidate in the near future, however, this trend offers an actual opportunity to improve the quality of news and the right to receive information.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17577632.2020.1869486","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43762487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Police investigations, privacy and the Marcel principle in breach of confidence 警方调查，隐私和马塞尔原则违反保密
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2020.1760473
N. A. Moreham
{"title":"Police investigations, privacy and the Marcel principle in breach of confidence","authors":"N. A. Moreham","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2020.1760473","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2020.1760473","url":null,"abstract":"(2020). Police investigations, privacy and the Marcel principle in breach of confidence. Journal of Media Law: Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1-12.","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138503643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
More serious harm than good? An empirical observation and analysis of the effects of the serious harm requirement in section 1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013 弊大于利?对2013年《诽谤法》第1(1)条中严重损害要求的影响进行实证观察和分析
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2020-06-11 DOI: 10.1080/17577632.2020.1776560
Charlie Sewell
{"title":"More serious harm than good? An empirical observation and analysis of the effects of the serious harm requirement in section 1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013","authors":"Charlie Sewell","doi":"10.1080/17577632.2020.1776560","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2020.1776560","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>ABSTRACT</b></p> <p>This article empirically analyses the judicial construction of section 1(1) of the Defamation Act 2013 within the first five years of the serious reputational harm threshold coming into operation. The relevant judgments considering serious harm have been carefully examined and dissected with a qualitative analysis approach, in which prominent themes and factors discussed in judicial interpretations have been distilled and evaluated. To this pursuit, the analysis investigates the evolution of judicial opinion in the development of section 1(1), exhibiting the merits of a multi-circumstantial approach in assessing the existence or likelihood of serious reputational harm in line with the leading Supreme Court construction of the serious harm test.</p>","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138503642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Police investigations, privacy and the Marcel principle in breach of confidence 警方调查，隐私和马塞尔原则违反保密
Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3547209
N. Moreham
{"title":"Police investigations, privacy and the Marcel principle in breach of confidence","authors":"N. Moreham","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3547209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3547209","url":null,"abstract":"*A number of recent English decisions have supported the idea that, in general, a person will have a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of a police investigation into his or her conduct (...","PeriodicalId":37779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Media Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43766491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信