Analiza i Egzystencja最新文献_第6页

Negatio non cognoscitur nisi per affirmationem: Some Remarks on Negation Parasitism in John Duns Scotus’s Writings 否定非肯定即否定——略论邓斯·司各脱作品中的否定寄生性

Analiza i Egzystencja Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI: 10.18276/aie.2021.54-05

Matteo Maserati

引用次数: 0

A Pragmatic Theory of Everyday Imposition of Words in an Anonymous Thirteenth-Century Commentary on De anima (MS Prague, Metropolitan Chapter, M. 80, ff. 54vA–55rB) 13世纪一篇匿名的De anima评论中日常词语附加的语用理论（布拉格，大都会区分会，M.80，第54vA–55rB页）

Analiza i Egzystencja Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI: 10.18276/aie.2021.54-01

Claudia Appolloni

引用次数: 0

Conception, Connotation, and Essential Predication: Peter Auriol’s Conceptualism to the Test in II Sententiarum, d. 9, q. 2, art. 1 概念、内涵与本质预测:彼得·奥里奥的概念论检验，《句子论》第2期，第9期，第2期。1

Analiza i Egzystencja Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI: 10.18276/aie.2021.54-03

G. Fornasieri

{"title":"Conception, Connotation, and Essential Predication: Peter Auriol’s Conceptualism to the Test in II Sententiarum, d. 9, q. 2, art. 1","authors":"G. Fornasieri","doi":"10.18276/aie.2021.54-03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18276/aie.2021.54-03","url":null,"abstract":"This paper comprises two parts. The first part is an introduction to Auriol’s moderate conceptualism, as it is presented in his Commentary on Book II of the Sentences, distinction 9, question 2, article 1. The second part is an edition of the text. In the introduction, I focus on Auriol’s use of the noetic tool of connotation. My thesis, in particular, is that connotation is a necessary prerequisite to his moderate conceptu\u0002alism. To this purpose, the first part of this introduction will be devoted to a brief presentation of Auriol’s conceptualism. In the second part, Auriol’s theory of essential predication will be presented. In the third part, I will present my claim that Auriol’s theory of essential predication can only be made sense of when read against the background of his theory of connotation as applied to intellectual cognition. Finally, I will offer a collation of Auriol’s Commentary on Book II of the Sentences, dis\u0002tinction 9, question 2, article 1, obtained by collating eight manuscripts, which \u0000hand down Auriol’s text, that is, Firenze, Biblioteca nazionale centrale, ms. Conv. Soppr. B.6.121, Firenze, ms. Conv. Soppr. A. 3.120, Napoli, Biblioteca nazionale, ms. VII.C.3, Padova, Biblioteca Antoniana, ms. 161, scaff. ix, Paris, Bibliotheque nationale de France, ms. latin 15867; Pelplin, Biblioteka Seminarium duchownego, ms. 46/85, Vaticano (Citta del), Biblioteca Apostolica, ms. Borgiano 404, Vaticano (Citta del), Biblioteca Apostolica, ms. Vat. lat. 942.","PeriodicalId":37710,"journal":{"name":"Analiza i Egzystencja","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47178951","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Assensum in mente prophetae: William of Ockham and Walter Chatton on Prophecies 《论预言:奥卡姆的威廉和沃尔特·查顿论预言

Analiza i Egzystencja Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI: 10.18276/aie.2021.54-02

Roberto Limonta, Riccardo Fedriga

引用次数: 0

The Middle Color: A History of a Problem in Thirteenth Century Oxford Commentaries on De sensu et sensato 中间色：13世纪一个问题的历史——牛津关于感觉与感觉的评论

Analiza i Egzystencja Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI: 10.18276/aie.2021.54-04

Monika Mansfeld

引用次数: 0

Natural Reason and God’s Infinite Power: Diversity of Approaches in the Late 13th and 14th Century Commentaries on Averroes’s De substantia orbis 自然理性与上帝的无穷力量：13世纪末和14世纪方法的多样性——评埃弗罗斯的《实体论》

Analiza i Egzystencja Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI: 10.18276/aie.2021.54-06

Łukasz Tomanek

{"title":"Natural Reason and God’s Infinite Power: Diversity of Approaches in the Late 13th and 14th Century Commentaries on Averroes’s De substantia orbis","authors":"Łukasz Tomanek","doi":"10.18276/aie.2021.54-06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18276/aie.2021.54-06","url":null,"abstract":"The subject of this article is Latin reception of Averroes’s treatise De substantia orbis, with special regard to the commentary practice in the late Middle Ages. Numerous philosophical problems were taken up in these commentaries following Averroes’s lead. The most controver-sial among them were these concerning divine attributes, i.e., infinite power, efficient and final causality, and, consequently, God's ability to create out of nothing. \u0000Three different commentaries were therefore chosen to exemplify the key differences be-tween the doctrinal approaches of the commentaries on the De substantia orbis. The first two of them—composed by Fernand of Spain and Maino de’ Maineri—represent the Averroistic approach, adopting and developing Averroes’s ideas; the third commentary—composed by an anonymous author in Erfurt around 1362—represents the non-Averroistic approach referring to the questions raised in the De substantia orbis in order to propose orthodox solutions being far from these adopted in the treaty by Averroes himself. \u0000The article aims at scrutinizing the problems of infinite power of God and divine causali-ty as they have been taken up by Latin philosophers from the late XIIIth to the second half of the XIVth century by elucidating the key differences between the two lines of inquiry and highligh-ting the variety of approaches to Averroes’s De substantia orbis.","PeriodicalId":37710,"journal":{"name":"Analiza i Egzystencja","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49411497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Difficult birth of the agent. Memory of the body, identity and social competence 代理出生困难。身体记忆、身份和社会能力

Analiza i Egzystencja Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.18276/aie.2021.56-01

M. Żardecka

引用次数: 0

Calculability and incalculability of distributive justice in the medical and pandemic context 在医疗和流行病背景下分配正义的可计算性和不可计算性

Analiza i Egzystencja Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.18276/aie.2021.53-05

M. Kowalska

引用次数: 0

Wittgenstein and the Pseudo-Problem of Evil 维特根斯坦与邪恶的伪问题

Analiza i Egzystencja Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.18276/aie.2021.55-03

Zoheir Bagheri Noaparast

{"title":"Wittgenstein and the Pseudo-Problem of Evil","authors":"Zoheir Bagheri Noaparast","doi":"10.18276/aie.2021.55-03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18276/aie.2021.55-03","url":null,"abstract":"Theists believe that our world was created by an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God. If God with such traits creates a world, we would expect that the world to have certain features. Such features should be compatible with God’s traits. We do not expect a God who is omnipotent and omniscient to create a poorly-designed world. If we believe that our world is created by God with the aforementioned traits and yet our world is poorly designed, we would either abandon our belief that our world was created by God or we would preserve our belief. If we wish to preserve our belief we would either revise the traits we attribute to him, or we would find a way to justify the co-existence of God with such traits as the creator and a poorly-designed world. In the history of philosophy one feature of our world has been subject to a great many debates, namely ‘evil’. By evil we have all the pain and sufferings that sentient beings go through. God is said to be omnibenevolent, as a result he would not want us to go through pain and suffering. He is also omniscient and omnipotent and therefore he has the knowledge and power to do so. Yet we are facing pain and suffering in this world. For the theists reconciling the existing evil in this world with God is a great challenge and atheists try to argue from evil and prove the non-existence of God. The debate between theists and atheists surrounding the problem of evil presupposes a certain conception of God. The presupposition is that God is a person who possesses a mind, will power and has a moral character. For Wittgenstein attributing personhood to God is a confusion. As a result, for Wittgenstein there can be no ‘problem of evil’ and the debates between the theists and atheists is not engaging with a real problem but a pseudo-problem. The problem of evil does not need a solution and smart arguments and counter-arguments, rather it needs therapy.","PeriodicalId":37710,"journal":{"name":"Analiza i Egzystencja","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67979806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Social structure and collective memory 社会结构和集体记忆

Analiza i Egzystencja Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.18276/aie.2021.53-01

M. Żardecka

{"title":"Social structure and collective memory","authors":"M. Żardecka","doi":"10.18276/aie.2021.53-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18276/aie.2021.53-01","url":null,"abstract":"The paper explores the relation between collective memory and social theory, trying in particular to show the key role that the notion of collective memory plays in understanding the dynamics of the social process (structuration, genesis of social structure). It does it by means of a series of reinterpretations of classical authors. Investigating the phenomenon of forgetting as covering up the traces of social change (M. Halbwachs), problematized in the contemporary context (P. Bourdieu), leads us to unraveling the problematic character of social change as such in a vain effort of annulment of memory (A. Touraine), and finally to rediscovering of social memory at a deeper level, as a profound structure of social processes. This discovery points to the necessity of introducing a new, yet undeveloped method of studying the social unconscious (A. Giddens, J. Assmann, and in particular J. Alexander). Jeffrey Alexander overtly postulates such a development, identifying his major project of cultural sociology with a kind of social psychoanalysis. The paper ends with a question – where such a postulate leads us to? Perhaps we need a new kind of art of benevolent interpretation that brings along with new understanding also some kind of soothing the pain of misery, deeply inscribed in social existence.","PeriodicalId":37710,"journal":{"name":"Analiza i Egzystencja","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67978927","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0