{"title":"Diversity in international arbitration","authors":"L. Fortier","doi":"10.1093/arbint/aiad020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiad020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37425,"journal":{"name":"Arbitration International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46370419","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Managing the unexpected in international arbitration","authors":"H. Heilbron","doi":"10.1093/arbint/aiad024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiad024","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37425,"journal":{"name":"Arbitration International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41655258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Dissenting opinions in international arbitration","authors":"John Fellas","doi":"10.1093/arbint/aiad028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiad028","url":null,"abstract":"Journal Article Dissenting opinions in international arbitration Get access John Fellas John Fellas fellas@fellasarbitration.com Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Arbitration International, Volume 39, Issue 2, June 2023, Pages 217–225, https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiad028 Published: 19 June 2023","PeriodicalId":37425,"journal":{"name":"Arbitration International","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136161426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The public interest in arbitration","authors":"Stavros Brekoulakis","doi":"10.1093/arbint/aiad026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiad026","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37425,"journal":{"name":"Arbitration International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48072201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A note on footnotes","authors":"John R. Crook","doi":"10.1093/arbint/aiad023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiad023","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37425,"journal":{"name":"Arbitration International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46405661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Neither express nor implied: rethinking governing law of the arbitration agreement","authors":"Andrew M. Ling","doi":"10.1093/arbint/aiad032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiad032","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 What law governs the arbitration agreement is a dividing issue in international arbitration. This Article critically examines three prevailing approaches from a both empirical and theoretical perspective. Using arbitral institutions’ statistics, the Singapore Academy of Law’s survey, and public filings of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, it evaluates whether the prevailing approaches are consistent with commercial practices of drafting international arbitration agreements. The Article concludes that treating law of the seat as the default governing law of the arbitration agreement, in the absence of an express choice of law for the arbitration agreement, is the most ideal approach.","PeriodicalId":37425,"journal":{"name":"Arbitration International","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41481917","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"India’s tryst with the group of companies doctrine: the end or the beginning of a new dawn?","authors":"V. Singh, Abhijnan Jha, Abhisar Vidyarthi","doi":"10.1093/arbint/aiad010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiad010","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Recently, in Cox & Kings Ltd. v. SAP India (P) Ltd (2022), the Supreme Court of India called into question the doctrinal ingredients and applicability of the group of companies doctrine in India. The Apex Court doubted the correctness of its consistent line of earlier decisions, wherein the group of companies doctrine had been strongly embraced as a tool to bind non-signatories to arbitration. Holding that the group of companies doctrine appears to have been based more on economics and convenience rather than law, the Supreme Court has referred several questions regarding the validity and applicability of the doctrine in India to a larger bench for consideration. The purpose of this case note is to summarize and comment on the judgment of the Supreme Court. The case note critically analyses the concerns and questions raised by the Supreme Court. In doing so, the case note concludes that there is sufficient basis for the existence and application of the group of companies doctrine under the [Indian] Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.","PeriodicalId":37425,"journal":{"name":"Arbitration International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45452883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
