European Yearbook on Human Rights 2018最新文献_第3页

Enhanced Structure and Geographical Balance: Reforming the OSCE's Human Dimension Meetings 加强结构和地域平衡:改革欧安组织的人文层面会议

European Yearbook on Human Rights 2018 Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781780688008.020

Jean P. Froehly

引用次数: 0

The Impact of ECtHR and CJEU Judgments on the Rights of Asylum Seekers in the European Union: Adversaries or Allies in Asylum? 欧洲人权法院和欧洲法院判决对欧盟寻求庇护者权利的影响:庇护中的敌人还是盟友?

European Yearbook on Human Rights 2018 Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781780688008.015

J. D. Coninck

引用次数: 0

Stijn Smet and Eva Brems (eds.): When Human Rights Clash at the European Court of Human Rights – Conflict or Harmony? Stijn Smet和Eva Brems(编):欧洲人权法庭的人权冲突——冲突还是和谐?

European Yearbook on Human Rights 2018 Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781780688008.029

C. Seewald

引用次数: 0

Katja S. Ziegler, Elizabeth Wicks and Loveday Hodson (eds.): The UK and European Human Rights – A Strained Relationship? 卡佳·齐格勒、伊丽莎白·威克斯、洛夫迪·霍德森主编:《英国与欧洲人权——紧张的关系?》

European Yearbook on Human Rights 2018 Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781780688008.026

Christian Breitler

引用次数: 5

Nicole Bürli: Third-Party Interventions before the European Court of Human Rights Nicole brli:第三方在欧洲人权法庭的干预

European Yearbook on Human Rights 2018 Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781780688008.028

Philipp Alexander Dillinger

引用次数: 0

Philip Leach: Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights, 4th Edition 菲利普·利奇:《向欧洲人权法院提起诉讼》，第4版

European Yearbook on Human Rights 2018 Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781780688008.032

F. Hasel

引用次数: 0

Rising Populism and its Impact on Women's Rights: Selected Cases from the OSCE Region 兴起的民粹主义及其对妇女权利的影响:来自欧安组织区域的个案

European Yearbook on Human Rights 2018 Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781780688008.023

Ajla van Heel, Jacopo Leone

引用次数: 0

Sionaidh Douglas-Scott and Nicholas Hatzis (eds.): Research Handbook on EU Law and Human Rights 肖奈德·道格拉斯-斯科特和尼古拉斯·哈齐斯(编):欧盟法律与人权研究手册

European Yearbook on Human Rights 2018 Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781780688008.033

Melanie Helene Schinagl

引用次数: 0

Salafism in Europe: A Legal and Political Analysis of Human Rights and Security 萨拉菲主义在欧洲:人权与安全的法律与政治分析

European Yearbook on Human Rights 2018 Pub Date : 2018-10-31 DOI: 10.1017/9781780688008.018

Claudia V. Elion

引用次数: 0

The Vanishing Constitution 正在消失的宪法

European Yearbook on Human Rights 2018 Pub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI: 10.1017/9781780688008.003

M. Wyrzykowski

{"title":"The Vanishing Constitution","authors":"M. Wyrzykowski","doi":"10.1017/9781780688008.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780688008.003","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In Poland, the constitutional crisis continues. The crisis was initiated in autumn 2015 by the combination of three elements: resolutions of the Parliament infringing the law, the President of the Republic and the President of the Council of Ministers. The constitutional crisis concerned the election by the Parliament of three judges of the Constitutional Tribunal to replace the judges already duly elected, the President‘s refusal to swear in the original three judges of the Constitutional Tribunal and the refusal of the Prime Minister to publish the judgments of the Constitutional Tribunal. The Acts passed in 2015 and 2016 regulate the Constitutional Tribunal in a way that is to be considered as violating the Constitution. The Constitutional Tribunal lost its role as the guardian of the Constitution. Further, the Parliament, in violation of the Constitution, made changes in the organisation and structure of the Supreme Court, inter alia , forcing more than 30 % of the judicial membership into early retirement or interrupting the constitutionally-guaranteed six – year term of office of the First President of the Supreme Court. Furthermore, the new regulation regarding the National Council of the Judiciary has encroached on the term of office of the Council‘s judicial members. Moreover, this reform set in motion a process of politicisation of the Council because its new judicial membership was appointed by the Parliament and not – as formerly required – by the assemblies of judges of particular judicial orders. These, as well as many other regulations, indicate a process of a ‘ hostile takeover ‘ of the constitutional order by changing the constitutional order through ordinary legislation: the parliamentary majority does not have the qualified majority required to formally change the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. The regulations discussed above violate the basic tenets of the rule of law and have become the subject of an unequivocally negative reaction of international organisations and authorities (the European Union (EU), the Council of Europe (CoE), and the United Nations (UN)) as well as associations representing general and constitutional courts. THE CONTEXT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS It is somewhat puzzling that there should be a phenomenon of a social movement protecting the constitutional order after the Constitution of the Republic of Poland has been in force for 20 years.","PeriodicalId":373856,"journal":{"name":"European Yearbook on Human Rights 2018","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130160872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3