J. Grohs, Andrew L. Gillen, H. Matusovich, Gary R. Kirk, H. Lesko, Justine Brantley, Cheryl Carrico
{"title":"Building community capacity for integrating engineering in rural middle school science classrooms","authors":"J. Grohs, Andrew L. Gillen, H. Matusovich, Gary R. Kirk, H. Lesko, Justine Brantley, Cheryl Carrico","doi":"10.15695/JSTEM/V3I1.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15695/JSTEM/V3I1.01","url":null,"abstract":"Broadening participation in engineering is an important national priority and has led to increasing demands for engineering content to be integrated into traditional K-12 curriculum. However, expecting teachers to incorporate engineering into their classrooms without additional training or resources is unreasonable. Partnering teachers with industry partners is one promising way to prioritize integrated science and engineering content while also introducing youth to possible career paths. In this programmatic article, we introduce the Partnering with Educators and Engineers in Rural Schools (PEERS) project that focuses on the collaborative design, implementation, and study of recurrent hands-on engineering activities with middle school youth in three rural communities in or near Appalachia. We discuss the curricular priorities of the program as well as preliminary findings on both student-focused and capacity-building metrics across the partnerships. Key discussion points include (1) a need to distill goals for engineering outreach by wrestling with what success might really look like for middle-school youth engagement with engineering and (2) cultivating community capacity to better support education systems and the simultaneous potential for and challenges of collaborating to build such infrastructure.","PeriodicalId":371616,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of STEM Outreach","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129570211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Providing Transferable, Professional Skills for the Next Generation of Scientific Professionals through an Outreach Opportunity","authors":"Tessy S. Ritchie, Melissa McCartney","doi":"10.15695/jstem/v2i1.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v2i1.15","url":null,"abstract":"Today’s scientists increasingly bear the responsibility of sharing scientific results with the public. To help meet this challenge, there is a need to provide scientists with training in science outreach and education. This kind of professional development would benefit both scientists and the public if scientists could learn these skills while simultaneously creating resources that can be shared with the larger community. To this end, we have developed “Annotator Professional Development,” an interactive professional development opportunity designed to introduce graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and interested STEM professionals to the basic principles of science education through participation in an educational outreach opportunity. Here we present details about this project, including data suggesting that participants begin to comprehend how outreach skills can be valuable in a variety of STEM careers. We also discuss the feasibility and potential of expanding the program.","PeriodicalId":371616,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of STEM Outreach","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130644882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Assessing The Use of Virtual Reality Technology in Teaching Marine Ecological Concepts","authors":"Emily Duwan, F. Choi, B. Helmuth","doi":"10.15695/jstem/v2i1.14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v2i1.14","url":null,"abstract":"Virtual reality environments are becoming increasingly popular as educational tools, but it remains unclear when these environments enhance learning or when they are a distraction from the learning process. We compared two different methods for teaching ecological concepts about the rocky intertidal zone by comparing an experimental (virtual) class with a control (traditional) type of class. We investigated whether cognitive (i.e., knowledge) and affective (i.e., attitudes, perceptions) outcomes are enhanced when students use lesson plans presented in a virtual reality environment compared with lesson plans facilitated via traditional methods. We also assessed the extent to which these attributes are enhanced when students create their own virtual tours as part of a field-based learning experience. The experimental group showed significantly higher maintenance of knowledge gain than the traditional group at the conclusion of the study, but there were no other significant differences among treatment groups. Feedback from teachers reported that students were more engaged, had better recall, and enjoyed the change from the traditional lecture style. Lack of statistically different scores measuring excitement suggests a need for improvement in the design and implementation of these virtual environments to maximize their appeal to students. However, our results suggest that virtual reality technologies provide an innovative alternative to standard lesson plans that can help improve knowledge retention about ecological concepts.","PeriodicalId":371616,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of STEM Outreach","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121746596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christopher J. Cappelli, Katherine L. Boice, Meltem Alemdar
{"title":"Evaluating University-Based Summer STEM Programs: Challenges, Successes, and Lessons Learned","authors":"Christopher J. Cappelli, Katherine L. Boice, Meltem Alemdar","doi":"10.15695/JSTEM/V2I1.13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15695/JSTEM/V2I1.13","url":null,"abstract":"As interest increases in promoting STEM education in America, summer STEM programs are a promising option for increasing student engagement, interest, and knowledge of STEM. However, STEM programs pose challenges for evaluation, especially programs that serve a large number of students and address a wide range of STEM topics. This paper describes how a team of researchers and practitioners collaborated to design and implement an evaluation of a series of STEM summer programs held at a large, public university. The programs varied in the STEM topics they covered and the age of participants. This created challenges for evaluating a series of programs of such scope and variety. This paper will further describe the programs and the methods used to evaluate them. Illustrative results of the evaluation will be shared, in addition to lessons learned from our evaluation in the hopes that this paper can serve as a resource for those looking for a feasible way to evaluate large, diverse programs.","PeriodicalId":371616,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of STEM Outreach","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129251141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jamie R. Shuda, Valerie G. Butler, Robert G. Vary, Noora F. Noushad, S. Farber
{"title":"A 3-Year Model for Building a Sustainable Science Outreach and Teacher Collaborative","authors":"Jamie R. Shuda, Valerie G. Butler, Robert G. Vary, Noora F. Noushad, S. Farber","doi":"10.15695/JSTEM/V2I1.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15695/JSTEM/V2I1.12","url":null,"abstract":"BioEYES is a K-12 science outreach program that develops self-sustaining teachers as a replication strategy to address high demand for the program while promoting long-term school partnerships. This paper explores the practices of “model teachers” from multiple grades, who are empowered over a three-year period to deliver BioEYES’ hands-on science content autonomously, as compared to the program’s standard co-teaching model (BioEYES educator + classroom teacher). The authors found that BioEYES’ professional development (PD) workshop, classroom co-teaching experience, and refresher trainings assist teachers in gaining autonomy to teach the program’s curricula. In addition, the authors found: 1) a similar effectiveness on student learning across three grade bands, and 2) positive attitude changes about science as a result of the program, regardless if the BioEYES unit was taught by a model teacher or program staff. Further we found that high school model teachers exceeded the performance of BioEYES educators. This observation supports our contention that giving high quality STEM programing that includes multi-level PD to teachers generates the strongest possible outcome. Overall, we characterize the impact and financial investment of BioEYES and describe a PD framework that can be used by outreach providers to deliver content, expand their reach, and sustain school partnerships.","PeriodicalId":371616,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of STEM Outreach","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114674096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
K. Stofer, L. Lundgren, B. A. Dunckel, Vaughan James, Makenna Lange, Janice L. Krieger
{"title":"Public Engagement on Climate and Health in Museums and Participatory Dialogues may Foster Behavior Change","authors":"K. Stofer, L. Lundgren, B. A. Dunckel, Vaughan James, Makenna Lange, Janice L. Krieger","doi":"10.15695/JSTEM/V2I1.10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15695/JSTEM/V2I1.10","url":null,"abstract":"As scientific knowledge grows and the planet’s human population makes unprecedented changes, decision-making places more and more demands on the everyday democratic participant. Yet efforts to help the public acquire and make use of evidence-based information fall short. We present preliminary comparisons of three participatory design models of public engagement with science designed to encourage community action rather than just raise awareness in participants on local public health issues impacted by climate change. We collected survey data at two in-person community-based participatory dialogues and a museum exhibit and presented but received no surveys from and televised versions of the participatory dialogues. Results indicated that behavior change was indeed salient to participants. Actions participants plan to take included sharing what they learned, contacting legislators, and direct conservation efforts. Future research should study whether participants undertake planned actions and do so in groups rather than as individuals.","PeriodicalId":371616,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of STEM Outreach","volume":"79 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128114233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Farahi, Ravi R. Gupta, C. Krawiec, A. Plazas, R. Wolf
{"title":"Astronomers' and Physicists' Attitudes Toward Education and Public Outreach: A Programmatic Study of The Dark Energy Survey","authors":"A. Farahi, Ravi R. Gupta, C. Krawiec, A. Plazas, R. Wolf","doi":"10.15695/JSTEM/V2I1.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15695/JSTEM/V2I1.09","url":null,"abstract":"We present a programmatic study of physicists’ and astronomers’ attitudes towards education and public outreach (EPO) using 131 survey responses from members of the Dark Energy Survey. We find a disparity between the types of EPO activities researchers deem valuable and those in which they participate. Most respondents are motivated to engage in EPO by a desire to educate the public. Barriers to engagement include career- and skill-related concerns, but lack of time is the main deterrent. We explore the value of centralized EPO efforts and conclude with a list of recommendations for increasing researchers’ engagement.","PeriodicalId":371616,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of STEM Outreach","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125178085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Girls' STEM Identity Growth in Co-Educational and Single-Sex STEM Summer Camps","authors":"Kari L. Roberts, Roxanne Hughes","doi":"10.15695/JSTEM/V2I1.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15695/JSTEM/V2I1.07","url":null,"abstract":"Informal STEM education programs have become venues wherein girls can improve their sense of belonging and potential success (STEM identity) through interactions with role models and seeing how STEM fields are relevant to them. Despite decades of advocacy for single-sex programs’ role in improving girls’ STEM identity, few studies have found definitive results. To explore the role that a single-sex environment can have on adolescent girls’ STEM identity development, this study compares participating girls’ STEM identity from pre- to post-test using linear regression and hierarchical linear modeling to determine whether participants have a larger identity growth in an all-girls informal STEM education summer camp (STEM GIRLS) or a co-educational informal STEM education summer camp (STEM STARS). Results indicate that STEM Self-Efficacy and STEM Identity are positively correlated, however, the model is currently incomplete and could use more clarity to determine the role one plays on the other. Despite this, our study indicates the value in addressing self-efficacy by giving girls opportunities to struggle through challenges. This study also found that both camps were similarly beneficial in impacting STEM Identity and STEM Self-Efficacy, further supporting research that highlights the gendered aspect of the camp is less impactful than the practices used.","PeriodicalId":371616,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of STEM Outreach","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115001016","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
A. Lam, J. Bauer, Susanna Fraass, Sarah L. Sheffield, Maggie R. Limbeck, R. Borden, M. Thompson-Munson, A. Fraass, J. Hills, Cameron E. Muskelly, Kyle R. Hartshorn, R. Bryant
{"title":"Time Scavengers: An Educational Website to Communicate Climate Change and Evolutionary Theory to the Public through Blogs, Web Pages, and Social Media Platforms","authors":"A. Lam, J. Bauer, Susanna Fraass, Sarah L. Sheffield, Maggie R. Limbeck, R. Borden, M. Thompson-Munson, A. Fraass, J. Hills, Cameron E. Muskelly, Kyle R. Hartshorn, R. Bryant","doi":"10.15695/JSTEM/V2I1.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15695/JSTEM/V2I1.05","url":null,"abstract":"Climate change and evolution are topics at the forefront of political discussions, debates, and the public sphere. Regardless of evidence on both topics, the public as a whole still believes they are under debate. It is imperative that the public have access to correct and easy-to-digest information on these topics to make informed environmental and ecological decisions. To date, scientifically accurate digital platforms aimed at informing the public on these topics are overly complex and jargon-ridden. Time Scavengers (www.timescavengers.blog) was created to address these issues and is maintained by a group of academics, graduate students, avocational scientists, and educators. The site includes many informational pages about geology, climate change, and evolution, all written for the public with useful descriptions and figures. To make the process of science more transparent, the site includes blogs to provide insight into data collection and interpretation, field work, and public outreach. The site also includes additional pages with links to relevant content and activities appropriate for K-12 classrooms. The overarching goals of the site are to bridge the gap between scientists and the public through engaging, informational pages and personal experiences and to increase science literacy through easy-to-digest content.","PeriodicalId":371616,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of STEM Outreach","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134105595","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Standford's Summer Research Program for Teachers Long-Term Outcomes Study","authors":"K. Storm, Gary Lichtenstein","doi":"10.15695/JSTEM/V2I1.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15695/JSTEM/V2I1.04","url":null,"abstract":"Research Experience for Teachers (RET) programs have been placing K-12 teachers in university research labs for almost three decades (Pop et al., 2010). However, the long-term impacts are rarely explored. This paper summarizes data from a survey study of 135/158 teachers (88% response rate) who participated in Stanford University’s RET programs between 2005 and 2017. The purpose of the study was to gauge the lasting impact of RET, if any, on teacher retention and classroom and professional practices. The data strongly suggest that participants gain long-lasting personal and professional benefits from participation--value that seems to be especially magnified for mid- to late-career teachers who are well established in their teaching practices but committed to continuous improvement. Furthermore, if the self-reports are accurate, these results would presumably also accrue to teachers’ students. Findings are attributed to the efficacy of the RET model. The authors argue for a nationwide evaluation of the efficacy of RET for teacher retention and professional development.","PeriodicalId":371616,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of STEM Outreach","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134474037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}