发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Oslo Law Review最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Norway’s Constitution in a Comparative Perspective 比较视角下的挪威宪法
Oslo Law Review Pub Date : 2019-12-20 DOI: 10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-03-02
M. Langford, B. Berge
{"title":"Norway’s Constitution in a Comparative Perspective","authors":"M. Langford, B. Berge","doi":"10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-03-02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-03-02","url":null,"abstract":"The Norwegian constitution is the second oldest living constitution in the world, and the country’s Supreme Court was also the second in the world to judicially review legislation. Yet, Norway’s deep constitutional history has gone often unnoticed in comparative scholarship, while comparative constitutional law within Norway has not attracted significant attention, despite the many constitutional influences from abroad. This article introduces the Norwegian constitution to an international audience and places it within a comparative perspective for a Norwegian readership. After a brief overview of comparative method(s), the remainder of the article focuses on three core areas of constitutional law: system of government, judicial review, and constitutional amendments. Using descriptive statistics, qualitative case studies, and legal and archival sources, the Norwegian experience is situated within a global context.","PeriodicalId":36793,"journal":{"name":"Oslo Law Review","volume":"6 1","pages":"198-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48281503","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Grave Breaches and Justifications: The War Crime of Forcible Transfer or Deportation of Civilians and the Exception for Evacuations for Imperative Military Reasons 严重违法行为及其正当性:强迫转移或驱逐平民的战争罪和出于紧急军事原因的撤离的例外
Oslo Law Review Pub Date : 2019-09-17 DOI: 10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-02-03
E. Brandon
{"title":"Grave Breaches and Justifications: The War Crime of Forcible Transfer or Deportation of Civilians and the Exception for Evacuations for Imperative Military Reasons","authors":"E. Brandon","doi":"10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-02-03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-02-03","url":null,"abstract":"The Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits the forcible transfer or deportation of civilian populations and classifies this action as a grave breach of the laws of war. However, attempts to prosecute this grave violation are hindered by an exception for evacuations of the civilian population for imperative military reasons, which has yet to be satisfactorily defined, either in scholarly literature or in the law. This article analyses the drafting history of the Geneva Convention provisions, the practice of international tribunals, the practice of States, and the practice of international and regional human rights organisations to establish a concrete definition of this exception so that international criminal prosecutors can prosecute confidently this grave war crime and defendants are assured of appropriate notice of all elements of this crime.","PeriodicalId":36793,"journal":{"name":"Oslo Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48909696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
From Aristotle’s ʻArithmetic Proportion’ to Ménage-à-trois – Anglo-American Justice Theories in the Context of Norwegian Tort Law 从亚里斯多德的“算术比例”到m - - - -à-trois——以挪威侵权法为背景的英美正义理论
Oslo Law Review Pub Date : 2019-09-17 DOI: 10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-02-01
Birgitte Hagland
{"title":"From Aristotle’s ʻArithmetic Proportion’ to Ménage-à-trois – Anglo-American Justice Theories in the Context of Norwegian Tort Law","authors":"Birgitte Hagland","doi":"10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-02-01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-02-01","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36793,"journal":{"name":"Oslo Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44923752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests 欧洲人权法院的儿童绑架案——改变对儿童最大利益的看法
Oslo Law Review Pub Date : 2019-09-17 DOI: 10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-02-02
Torunn E. Kvisberg
{"title":"Child Abduction Cases in the European Court Of Human Rights – Changing Views on the Child’s Best Interests","authors":"Torunn E. Kvisberg","doi":"10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-02-02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-02-02","url":null,"abstract":"Copyright © 2019 Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 \u0000License","PeriodicalId":36793,"journal":{"name":"Oslo Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48770371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Choice of Law and Intellectual Property Rights 法律选择与知识产权
Oslo Law Review Pub Date : 2019-05-14 DOI: 10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-07
Annette Kur, Ulf Maunsbach
{"title":"Choice of Law and Intellectual Property Rights","authors":"Annette Kur, Ulf Maunsbach","doi":"10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-07","url":null,"abstract":"An increased number of intellectual property rights infringements challenges modern society and its legal institutions. The development is enhanced by digitalisation, following in the footsteps of the emerging information society and the ease by which intellectual property rights can be shared. The fact that sharing is a borderless activity has made it crucial to find solutions to a growing number of cross-border disputes. The development unfolds in two ways: the enhancement of legal initiatives as regards substantive intellectual property protection, and an increasing interest in private international law. In this article, this development is discussed with a specific focus on choice-of-law issues that arise in cross-border infringement cases. The solution of applying the law of the protecting country as a principle rule that is found in Article 8 in the Rome II Regulation is thoroughly analysed, and some alternative ways to solve ‘choice of law’ issues are presented in light of the development of a new choice-of-law regime in Norway.","PeriodicalId":36793,"journal":{"name":"Oslo Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46970982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Assignment of Claims and Proprietary Effects: Overview of Doctrinal Debate and the EU Commission’s Proposal 权利要求的转让和所有权的影响:理论辩论的概述和欧盟委员会的建议
Oslo Law Review Pub Date : 2019-05-14 DOI: 10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-02
Herbert Kronke
{"title":"Assignment of Claims and Proprietary Effects: Overview of Doctrinal Debate and the EU Commission’s Proposal","authors":"Herbert Kronke","doi":"10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-02","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-02","url":null,"abstract":"Both the 1980 Rome Convention and the Rome I Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations have not addressed the issue of the proprietary effects of assignments. Intense doctrinal debate, discussion of the issue in various appellate courts’ jurisprudence as well as (limited) empirical research are the basis for a current draft Regulation that proposes a two-tiered system of connecting factors (law of the assignor’s habitual residence, law of the assigned claim in specific cases). Subject to a few clarifications that are, in the author’s view, highly recommendable the instrument will deliver greatly enhanced legal certainty.","PeriodicalId":36793,"journal":{"name":"Oslo Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43316961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Rationale of the Exclusion of Choice of Law by the Parties in Articles 6(4) and 8(3) of Rome II Regulation 《罗马II规则》第6(4)条和第8(3)条排除当事人选择法律的理由
Oslo Law Review Pub Date : 2019-05-14 DOI: 10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-08
P. D. Vareilles-Sommières
{"title":"Rationale of the Exclusion of Choice of Law by the Parties in Articles 6(4) and 8(3) of Rome II Regulation","authors":"P. D. Vareilles-Sommières","doi":"10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-08","url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the reasons why Rome II restricts party autonomy in Articles 6 and 8.","PeriodicalId":36793,"journal":{"name":"Oslo Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43583259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Choice of Law by the Parties in Rome II: Rationale of the Differentiation between Consumer and Commercial Contracts 罗马当事人的法律选择II：消费者合同和商业合同区别的理由
Oslo Law Review Pub Date : 2019-05-14 DOI: 10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-09
Michael Hellner
{"title":"Choice of Law by the Parties in Rome II: Rationale of the Differentiation between Consumer and Commercial Contracts","authors":"Michael Hellner","doi":"10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-09","url":null,"abstract":"The article explores Article 14 on choice of law by the parties in Rome II and the possibilities for party autonomy. There is a limit to party autonomy where both parties are not ‘pursuing commerci ...","PeriodicalId":36793,"journal":{"name":"Oslo Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44654291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Choice of Law for Defamation, Privacy Rights and Freedom of Speech 诽谤、隐私权和言论自由的法律选择
Oslo Law Review Pub Date : 2019-05-14 DOI: 10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-01-06
P. A. Nielsen
{"title":"Choice of Law for Defamation, Privacy Rights and Freedom of Speech","authors":"P. A. Nielsen","doi":"10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-01-06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2019-01-06","url":null,"abstract":"The conflict between defamation and privacy rights on the one hand and freedom of speech on the other in international litigation is very controversial in the EU. The phenomenon, also known as libel tourism, is caused by a mixture of national and EU rules of jurisdiction, choice of law and recognition and enforcement of judgments, even though the former and latter are harmonised by the EU. The problem is that the EU has not yet harmonised the choice-of-law rules for defamation and privacy rights. Thus, proposals for reform of the EU choice-of-law rules are discussed.","PeriodicalId":36793,"journal":{"name":"Oslo Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47770913","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
The Relationship between the Rome II Regulation and the 1973 Hague Convention 《罗马II规则》与1973年《海牙公约》的关系
Oslo Law Review Pub Date : 2019-05-14 DOI: 10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-10
Michael Hellner
{"title":"The Relationship between the Rome II Regulation and the 1973 Hague Convention","authors":"Michael Hellner","doi":"10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN.2387-3299-2019-01-10","url":null,"abstract":"An analysis of the 1973 Hague Convention on the law applicable to product liability and the Rome II Regulation leads to the conclusion that the former takes precedence. What is more, both the explanatory report to the Hague Convention and case law from the Court of Justice of the European Union agree that in case there is lacunae in the Hague Convention, the answer should be sought in the Rome II Regulation.","PeriodicalId":36793,"journal":{"name":"Oslo Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47816722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信