Probing the Limits of Categorization最新文献_第2页

Stand by Your Man: 支持你的男人:

Probing the Limits of Categorization Pub Date : 2018-11-29 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8.19

S. Knittel

引用次数: 1

“Bystanders” in Exhibitions at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum 美国大屠杀纪念博物馆展览中的“旁观者”

Probing the Limits of Categorization Pub Date : 2018-11-29 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8.20

S. Bachrach

引用次数: 0

The Notion of Social Reactivity: 社会反应的概念:

Probing the Limits of Categorization Pub Date : 2018-11-29 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8.16

Jacques Sémelin

引用次数: 0

Hidden in Plain View: 隐藏在普通视图中:

Probing the Limits of Categorization Pub Date : 2018-11-29 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8.18

Wulf Kansteiner

引用次数: 0

List of Illustrations 插图一览表

Probing the Limits of Categorization Pub Date : 2018-11-29 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8.3

引用次数: 0

“I am not, what I am”: “我不是，我是什么”

Probing the Limits of Categorization Pub Date : 2018-11-29 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8.8

Timothy Williams

引用次数: 2

The Dutch Bystander as Non-Jew and Implicated Subject 荷兰旁观者作为非犹太人和牵连主体

Probing the Limits of Categorization Pub Date : 2018-11-29 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8.10

R. Ensel, E. Gans

引用次数: 0

Ordinary, Ignorant, and Noninvolved? 普通、无知、不参与?

Probing the Limits of Categorization Pub Date : 2018-11-29 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8.17

Krijn Thijs

引用次数: 0

Index 指数

Probing the Limits of Categorization Pub Date : 2018-11-29 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8.23

引用次数: 0

Bystanders: 旁观者:

Probing the Limits of Categorization Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8.5

M. Fulbrook

{"title":"Bystanders:","authors":"M. Fulbrook","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8.5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw04hm8.5","url":null,"abstract":"The notion of bystander has become an established part of the way we talk about conflict situations. The concept is widely used to discuss situations when people are in proximity to a situation of conflict, and questions arise about moral responsibility to intervene. But the focus on the actors in the trilogy tends to deflect attention from the context of action. This chapter raises questions rooted in the distinction between individually motivated acts of violence, and systemic, state-sanctioned, collective violence. While the former may be viewed as discrete incidents in which perpetrators and victims constitute a core conflict situation and bystanders in some sense ‘stand outside’ the conflict arena, in the latter the system of violence encompasses far larger numbers of people over extended periods of time and across vast swathes of territory. It is harder, when looking at systemic collective violence, to identify what might legitimately be seen as ‘outside’ the specific conflict situation. The concept of an individual bystander may therefore not be so useful in relation to a system of statesanctioned collective violence. Classic and recent approaches to bystanders suggest that it has functioned as a catch-all concept, and something of a residual category that is inherently unstable. The term may however be an appealing alibi, relevant to understanding selfrepresentations in accounts since 1945. Moreover, for historians a focus on the conditions under which bystanding behaviors are prevalent may assist in","PeriodicalId":359570,"journal":{"name":"Probing the Limits of Categorization","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130221588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6