Criminal Justice Ethics最新文献_第2页

Disenfranchisement as Distancing from Offenders? 剥夺公民权是为了远离罪犯?

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI: 10.1080/0731129x.2023.2275966

Gustavo A. Beade

引用次数: 0

Seeking and Speaking the Truth: Criminal Testimonial Justice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2023, 224 pp., $68 寻求并说出真相：刑事见证司法》。英国牛津：牛津大学出版社，2023 年，224 页，68 美元

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2023-09-02 DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.2023.2277494

Alan Hirsch

引用次数: 0

A Proposal to Criminalize State Torture in the United States 关于在美国将国家酷刑定为刑事犯罪的建议

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.2023.2230756

Kai Draper

引用次数: 0

The Agency Objection to Preventive Exclusion from Public Spaces 机构反对公共场所的预防性排斥

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.2023.2233331

S. Holmen

引用次数: 0

Actions, Agents, and Consequences 行动、代理人和后果

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.2023.2225995

Re’em Segev

{"title":"Actions, Agents, and Consequences","authors":"Re’em Segev","doi":"10.1080/0731129X.2023.2225995","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2023.2225995","url":null,"abstract":"According to an appealing and common view, the moral status of an action – whether it is wrong, for example – is sometimes important in itself in terms of the moral status of other actions – especially those that respond to the original action. This view is especially influential with respect to the criminal law. It is accepted not only by legal moralists but also by adherents of the harm principle, for example. In this paper, I argue against this view. The main arguments emphasize the distinctions between the moral status of actions, consequences, and agents. I argue that what matters, in terms of other actions, is not the moral status of the original action but rather other factors that may be confused with it, such as the moral status of its consequences – whether they are good or bad – and the moral status of the agent – whether she is praiseworthy or blameworthy. The intuitive appeal of the common view is, I argue, at least partly due to a conflation of these factors. Most importantly, once we recall the distinctions between these factors, we can see more clearly that this view lacks a compelling rationale. Or, at least, that it is based on assumptions that, first, are much more controversial than their conclusion, and, second, do not support every aspect of this view – and thus do not offer a unified foundation for this view.","PeriodicalId":35931,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45263371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Criminal Behavior and Mental Health Problems among Adolescents: A Cross-sectional Study and Description of Prevention Policy in Sweden 青少年犯罪行为与心理健康问题：瑞典预防政策的横断面研究与描述

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.2023.2241765

H. Källmén, Magnus Israelsson, P. Wennberg, A. H. Berman

引用次数: 0

What Does It Mean to End Mass Incarceration, and How Would We Know If We Did? 结束大规模监禁意味着什么?如果我们做到了，我们怎么知道?

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.2023.2170658

Vincent Chiao

{"title":"What Does It Mean to End Mass Incarceration, and How Would We Know If We Did?","authors":"Vincent Chiao","doi":"10.1080/0731129X.2023.2170658","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2023.2170658","url":null,"abstract":"Katherine Beckett’s new book, Ending Mass Incarceration (EMI), is ambitious and wide-ranging. Beckett tackles one of the most urgent human rights problems of the last fifty years, namely the massive growth of incarceration in the United States, with devastating consequences for millions of people who cycle through jails and prisons, disadvantaged communities, and for the cause of racial justice. The first half of EMI is diagnostic, focusing on Beckett’s analysis of the causes of mass incarceration, whereas the second half is programmatic, defending a series of proposals for winding it down. Broadly speaking, Beckett’s diagnosis centers on increases in the rates at which felony arrests are converted into custodial sentences in rural and suburban counties, and on across-the-board increases in time served over the last generation. Programmatically, Beckett proposes three main reforms: reducing what she deems “excessive” sentencing, in particular by imposing a twentyyear cap on custodial sentences and broadening parole eligibility; expanding restorative justice programs, including for people convicted of violent crimes; and replacing criminal enforcement for low-level drug offenses with harm reduction programs, perhaps taking a lead from the LEAD 2.0 program in Seattle. There is much to admire about EMI. Beckett is a careful researcher, draws on awide range of quantitative and qualitative research, and has the unusual ability to speak to both specialist and lay audiences. The last, in particular, is a difficult task to Vincent Chiao, University of Richmond, School of Law & Jepson School of Leadership. Email: vchiao@richmond.edu Criminal Justice Ethics, 2023 Vol. 42, No. 1, 86–98, https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2023.2170658","PeriodicalId":35931,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49162392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Punishment and Public Reason: Reply to Hoskins 惩罚与公共理性:对霍斯金斯的回答

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.2023.2181524

Chad W. Flanders

引用次数: 0

Exprisonment: Deprivation of Liberty on the Street and at Home 阐释：剥夺街头和家中的自由

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.2023.2174722

Hadassa Noorda

引用次数: 1

Retributivism, State Misconduct, and the Criminal Process 报应主义、国家不当行为与刑事诉讼

Criminal Justice Ethics Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/0731129X.2023.2184964

A. Zimran, Netanel Dagan

{"title":"Retributivism, State Misconduct, and the Criminal Process","authors":"A. Zimran, Netanel Dagan","doi":"10.1080/0731129X.2023.2184964","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2023.2184964","url":null,"abstract":"State agents’ misconduct (SAM), such as the violations carried out by the police or prosecution, may harm an offender’s rights during the criminal process in various ways. What, if anything, can retributivism, as an offense-focused theory that looks to the past, offer in response to SAM? The goal of this essay is to advance a retribution-based framework for responding to SAM within the criminal process. Two retribution-based arguments are provided. First, a retribution-based response to SAM aims to protect the legitimacy of the criminal process. Such an argument is based on how the crime and punishment connect to the moral standing of the state and that connection’s meaning for the legitimacy of the trial (legitimacy-based argument). Second, a retribution-based response to SAM aims to consider the offender’s side of the penal dialogue and promote a more accurate calibration of the penal suffering (compensation-based argument). Based on these arguments, the essay theorizes the legal response for SAM in US and non-US traditions through the retributive lens. The essay concludes with a call for expanding the multiple roles for retributive logic to include the actions of law-enforcement actors and addresses what that expansion means for the justice of the criminal process.","PeriodicalId":35931,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Ethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41899782","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0