Oriente Moderno最新文献_第5页

The Role of the Russian Political Agency in Diplomatic Relations between the Emirate of Bukhara and the Russian Empire 俄罗斯政治机构在布哈拉酋长国与俄罗斯帝国外交关系中的作用

Oriente Moderno Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI: 10.1163/22138617-12340289

Klichev Oybek

引用次数: 0

Introduction: Russian Colonialism, Women, and Politics in Central Asia 引言：俄罗斯殖民主义、妇女与中亚政治

Oriente Moderno Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI: 10.1163/22138617-12340282

Bakhodir Pasilov

引用次数: 0

Turkestan’s Place in the Russian Empire 突厥斯坦在俄罗斯帝国中的地位

Oriente Moderno Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI: 10.1163/22138617-12340284

A. Khalid

引用次数: 0

The Social Status of Muslim Women in Turkestan before and after Russian Colonization 俄罗斯殖民前后突厥斯坦穆斯林妇女的社会地位

Oriente Moderno Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI: 10.1163/22138617-12340288

Hidirova Nargiza O’rinovna

引用次数: 0

Political Organizations of Russian Turkestan at the Beginning of the 20th Century 20世纪初俄属突厥斯坦的政治组织

Oriente Moderno Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI: 10.1163/22138617-12340291

Abdullaev Rovshan

引用次数: 1

Semirechensk Cossacks in the Late 19th and Early 20th Centuries: from Military Class to Ethnic Group 19世纪末20世纪初的塞米雷琴斯克哥萨克：从军事阶层到民族

Oriente Moderno Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI: 10.1163/22138617-12340286

Karlygash S. Bizhigitova

引用次数: 0

The Formation of Kazakh Officialdom and Its Incorporation into the Russian Imperial System of Administration 哈萨克官场的形成及其在俄罗斯帝国行政体系中的地位

Oriente Moderno Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI: 10.1163/22138617-12340283

Saule K. Uderbaeva

引用次数: 0

The Legal Status of Muslim Women in Turkestan: on the Divorce Process (Late 19th-Early 20th Centuries) 突厥斯坦穆斯林妇女的法律地位:以离婚程序为例(19世纪末至20世纪初)

Oriente Moderno Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI: 10.1163/22138617-12340285

S. Shadmanova

引用次数: 0

The Russian Colonial Economy in Central Asia 俄罗斯在中亚的殖民经济

Oriente Moderno Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI: 10.1163/22138617-12340290

Bakhodir Pasilov

{"title":"The Russian Colonial Economy in Central Asia","authors":"Bakhodir Pasilov","doi":"10.1163/22138617-12340290","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22138617-12340290","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000The article addresses selected problems of the colonial economy in Central Asia which appeared following the Russian conquest of this region. The basis of this economy was the cultivation of a new, American cotton variety across the region and the subsequent development of cotton growing on an industrial scale. As a result of the large-scale introduction of this agricultural-technical culture, significant changes occurred in the structure of the region’s economy. One negative consequence of this transition to a colonial economy was the demise of the manufacture of finished products that had been common prior to Russian conquest of the region. This development reconfigured trade relations of the Bukhara Emirate, Khiva, and Kokand Khanates (Turkestan) with Russia, as following colonization the bulk of cotton exports to Russia was made up of raw materials, primarily cotton and cotton fiber.\u0000Cotton also played an important role in the regional geopolitics of Russia, particularly with regard to Afghanistan. Accordingly, it was more important for Russia to expand Afghanistan’s cotton production than to be dependent on cotton supplied from the United States.\u0000Railways became important elements of the colonial economy by providing a vital connection between urban centers and rural agricultural areas. This not only accelerated the delivery of raw materials, primarily cotton, to Russian industrial-textile centers, but also significantly reduced the delivery costs of goods. However, the unilateral development of this regional colonial economy ultimately aggravated social conditions among local populations. After the establishment of Soviet control in Central Asia, the agricultural policy of the Tsarist government became the prototype for the Bolsheviks in defining this region’s economic role in the Soviet economic system.","PeriodicalId":35837,"journal":{"name":"Oriente Moderno","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43940291","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Turkestan Statute and the Reorganization of Administrative Divisions in Central Asia, 1886-1917: a Case Study of Jizzakh District 1886-1917年《突厥斯坦规约》与中亚行政区划重组——以吉扎赫地区为例

Oriente Moderno Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI: 10.1163/22138617-12340287

A. Bazarbaev

{"title":"The Turkestan Statute and the Reorganization of Administrative Divisions in Central Asia, 1886-1917: a Case Study of Jizzakh District","authors":"A. Bazarbaev","doi":"10.1163/22138617-12340287","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22138617-12340287","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000For both political and economic reasons, the Russian Empire sought to establish administrative units in Central Asia based on taxonomic principles relating to governmental control, taxation, and land use. From the first years after the conquest, the colonial authorities introduced various new types of political divisions in the region. But the most foundational step in this process was the Turkestan Statute of 1886, which formally enumerated the requirements and naming conventions for establishing official administrative units. It is clear from the available sources that, before the 1886 statute, colonial efforts to establish administrative control, taxation, and regulated land use were sporadic and imprecise at best. For this reason, the Turkestan statute pressured colonial administrators to reconstitute administrative units that did not meet the requirements of the new Russian statutes. In this respect, the colonial officials tried to find a balance between the law and political-economic interests in reorganizing political divisions. This paper examines the reasons for the rearrangement of administrative units and the differences between the law and the bureaucratic views of colonial officials in this process. Its primary objective is to delineate ways in which colonial administrators used laws to consolidate administrative control, taxation, and land use in the process of redistribution of administrative-territorial units. My argument is that colonial officials implemented reorganization in some administrative units but not in others: in some cases, redistribution took place in administrative units that did not meet the political and economic interests of the colonial authorities, or colonial officials flouted the law altogether. In other cases, the colonial administration did not engage in redistribution of administrative units that did not pose a problem in governance and tax collection despite the fact that they were in violation of the requirements of the Turkestan statute.","PeriodicalId":35837,"journal":{"name":"Oriente Moderno","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48501914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0