The Moral Triangle最新文献_第4页

Conclusion 结论

The Moral Triangle Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1215/9781478012016-013

引用次数: 0

Points of Intersection 交点

The Moral Triangle Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv11sn7wt.15

Gilles, M. Konstantinov

{"title":"Points of Intersection","authors":"Gilles, M. Konstantinov","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv11sn7wt.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11sn7wt.15","url":null,"abstract":"Engaging with the methods of studying contemporary digital audiovisual art is a dominant topic in contemporary theories of art. Against this background, the article offers a view onto some aspects of Juri Lotman’s and Gilles Deleuze’s studies on the cinema. As a rule, contemporary studies of digital audiovisual art take place in the context of interdisciplinary studies. One of the methodological principles of such studies consists in adopting a structural and semiotic approach. As of today, this methodological approach to studying audio-visual art is most developed in semiotics of the cinema, which is why in this article visual semiotics in general is viewed through semiotics of the cinema (proceeding from the approach of Juri Lotman). Also, the philosophical understanding of the nature of the cinema offered by Gilles Deleuze has proven fundamental for the study of contemporary audio-visual art. The two authors were contemporaries, but represented different scholarly paradigms: while Juri Lotman was an adherent of structuralism, Gilles Deleuze was a poststructuralist who criticized the structuralist approach. Yet despite this principal difference, both scholars still arrived at similar conclusions as concerns several questions regarding the understanding of the cinema and its very nature. In the present paper I focus on the features of these authors’ approach to spatial and temporal relations in the cinema, audiovisual relations in film as a heterogeneous form of the work of art, virtuality and mythologism in the viewer’s perception of cinema. The differences and similarities in academic approaches to cinema, developed by Lotman and Deleuze, indicate a common direction in the development of the cinema and visual arts theory, which seems relevant for the study of contemporary audio-visual arts.","PeriodicalId":357603,"journal":{"name":"The Moral Triangle","volume":"566 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131916075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Index 指数

The Moral Triangle Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1215/9781478012016-017

引用次数: 0

Postscript 附言

The Moral Triangle Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1215/9781478012016-014

K. Galor

引用次数: 0