Eline van der Heijden, E. Koç, J. Ligthart, L. Meijdam
{"title":"Pensions and Consumption Decisions: Evidence from the Lab","authors":"Eline van der Heijden, E. Koç, J. Ligthart, L. Meijdam","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2585380","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2585380","url":null,"abstract":"Pensioners have increasingly more control over their income streams as a result of pension reforms, which gives them more freedom to save for their old age. We devise an experiment where subjects face a life-cycle optimization task with lifetime uncertainty and a given lifetime income. The aims are to test whether subjects' saving and consumption behaviour is affected by: (i) the steepness of the income profile; and (ii) the freedom to choose the steepness of the income prole before the optimization task. In general, subjects' consumption decisions deviate systematically from the optimal ones in the sense that they are overly sensitive to current income and financial wealth. Subject behavior is unaffected by the steepness of the income. When subjects are given such a flexibility their consumption decisions are relatively more sensitive to current income and financial wealth.","PeriodicalId":357131,"journal":{"name":"Netspar Research Paper Series","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125486749","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Using a Life Cycle Model to Evaluate Financial Literacy Program Effectiveness","authors":"A. Lusardi, P. Michaud, O. Mitchell","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2707618","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2707618","url":null,"abstract":"Prior studies disagree regarding the effectiveness of financial literacy programs, especially those offered in the workplace. To explain such measurement differences in evaluation and outcomes, we employ a stochastic life cycle model with endogenous financial knowledge accumulation to investigate how financial education programs optimally shape key economic outcomes. This approach permits us to measure how such programs shape wealth accumulation, financial knowledge, and participation in sophisticated assets (e.g. stocks) across heterogeneous consumers. We then apply conventional program evaluation econometric techniques to simulated data, distinguishing selection and treatment effects. We show that the more effective programs provide follow-up in order to sustain the knowledge acquired by employees via the program; in such an instance, financial education delivered to employeees around the age of 40 can raise savings at retirement by close to 10%. By contrast, one-time education programs do produce short-term but few long-term effects. We also measure how accounting for selection affects estimates of program effectiveness on those who participate. Comparisons of participants and non-participants can be misleading, even using a difference-in-difference strategy. Random program assignment is needed to evaluate program effects on those who participate.","PeriodicalId":357131,"journal":{"name":"Netspar Research Paper Series","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121489036","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Decomposing the Utility of Complex Alternatives from Mental Representations of Decisions","authors":"B. Dellaert, T. Arentze, O. Horeni, H. Timmermans","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2560809","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2560809","url":null,"abstract":"We introduce a utility theory-based model of consumers’ mental representation of attributes and benefits in decisions between complex alternatives. The model relies on the fact that there are cognitive costs and gains to activating additional decision components in mental representations. The gains are that with every component the individual is better able to discriminate between choice alternatives and the probability of making the best choice increases. The costs are the additional mental effort that is required to evaluate the decision components. We propose that a component is activated in a mental representation only if the expected gains of doing so exceed the mental costs of the evaluation. This proposition is formalized in a utility model where a decision component is cognitively activated if the utility variation caused by the component’s levels exceeds a mental cost threshold. This model allows us to decompose the utility of alternatives from mental representations of decisions without the need to observe choices. We illustrate the proposed approach using data on 594 individuals’ mental representations of a hypothetical shopping decision problem.","PeriodicalId":357131,"journal":{"name":"Netspar Research Paper Series","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125810847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christopher Kronenberg, H. van Kippersluis, Kirsten I. M. Rohde
{"title":"What Drives the Association between Health and Portfolio Choice?","authors":"Christopher Kronenberg, H. van Kippersluis, Kirsten I. M. Rohde","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2551770","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2551770","url":null,"abstract":"There is a persistent association between health and portfolio choice, but hardly anything is known about the underlying sources of heterogeneity: what makes healthier individuals hold more risky assets? This paper uses rich Dutch longitudinal data to take into account and explain unobserved heterogeneity in the association between health and portfolio choice. We show that the association largely reflects unobserved heterogeneity, which is driven partly by behavioural variables. Yet even when adding an extensive set of behavioural variables including risk aversion, stock aversion, loss aversion, time preferences, and mental accounting, the association between health and portfolio choice does not completely vanish.","PeriodicalId":357131,"journal":{"name":"Netspar Research Paper Series","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116833228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Leora Friedberg, Wenliang Hou, Wei Sun, A. Webb, Zhenyu Li
{"title":"New Evidence on the Risk of Requiring Long-Term Care","authors":"Leora Friedberg, Wenliang Hou, Wei Sun, A. Webb, Zhenyu Li","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2542572","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2542572","url":null,"abstract":"Long-term care is one of the major expenses faced by many older Americans. Yet, we have only limited information about the risk of needing long-term care and the expected duration of care. The expectations of needing to receive home health care, live in an assisted living facility or live in a nursing home are essential inputs into models of optimal post-retirement saving and long-term care insurance purchase. Previous research has used the Robinson (1996) transition matrix, based on National Long Term Care Survey (NLTCS) data for 1982-89. The Robinson model predicts that men and women aged 65 have a 27 and 44 percent chance, respectively, of ever needing nursing home care. Recent evidence suggests that those earlier estimates may be extremely misleading in important dimensions. Using Health and Retirement Study (HRS) data from 1992-2010, Hurd, Michaud, and Rohwedder (2013) estimate that men and women aged 50 have a 50 and 65 percent chance, respectively, of ever needing care. But, they also estimate shorter average durations of care, resulting, as we show, from a greater chance of returning to the community, conditional on admission. If nursing home care is a high-probability but relatively low-cost occurrence, models that treat it as a lower-probability, high-cost occurrence may overstate the value of insurance. We update and modify the Robinson model using more recent data from both the NLTCS and the HRS. We show that the low lifetime utilization rates and high conditional mean durations of stay in the Robinson model are artifacts of specific features of the statistical model that was fitted to the data. We also show that impairment and most use of care by age has declined and that the 2004 NLTCS and the 1996-2010 HRS yield similar cross-sectional patterns of care use. We revise and update the care transition model, and we show that use of the new transition matrix substantially reduces simulated values of willingness-to-pay in an optimal long-term care insurance model.","PeriodicalId":357131,"journal":{"name":"Netspar Research Paper Series","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126344512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Medicaid and Crowd-Out of Long-Term Care Insurance","authors":"Leora Friedberg, Wei Sun, A. Webb","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2706442","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2706442","url":null,"abstract":"Although long-term care costs represent a substantial financial risk for retired households, few purchase insurance. Previous research shows that it would not be optimal for most single individuals to purchase coverage, due to crowd-out by the means-tested partial insurance provided by Medicaid. Married couples pool risk (and so should value insurance less) but also face a greater cost in case the care of an infirm spouse impoverishes a healthy spouse (and so should value insurance more); recognizing this, Medicaid offers greater income and asset protection for married couples than for singles, increasing the implicit tax on private insurance. We construct a model in which retired households decide whether to insure themselves via a private policy or implicitly via saving or anticipated future Medicaid use, given their expectation of needing care. We also make use of new estimates of the likelihood of needing care, which differ in important dimensions from earlier estimates. Using numerical optimization techniques, we calculate that only married couples in the two top wealth deciles will be willing to purchase an actuarially fair insurance policy, implying even more crowd-out than for singles. Nevertheless, the absence of comprehensive insurance results in substantial welfare losses, amounting to an average of 10 percent of age-65 financial assets, because Medicaid provides only partial insurance while crowding out private purchases fully. We calculate that eliminating Medicaid spousal protection rules might increase coverage by XX percentage points. In contrast, plausible premium subsidies would have little effect on long-term care insurance coverage, given the current protection offered by Medicaid.","PeriodicalId":357131,"journal":{"name":"Netspar Research Paper Series","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130282870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Estimation of a Structural Labour Supply Model for Belgium: Application to the Earnings Test for Pension Recipients","authors":"M. Maes","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2496817","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2496817","url":null,"abstract":"In several OECD countries pension benefits are taxed away if retirees continue working and receive earnings that cross a threshold. Recently governments started to increase these earnings thresholds for working pensioners. On the basis of Belgian administrative data covering the years before and after such a reform, we show that bunching at a convex kink of the budget constraint tracks these tax rule changes. To account also for income effects along other parts of the piecewise-linear budget constraint, we estimate a structural labour supply model. A removal of the earnings test would lead to an increase of 2.44 hours worked per week but causes a budgetary deficit as well: pension benefits will be claimed earlier (as the deferral rate for pensions equals zero in Belgium) while social contribution revenues fall back. The intuition is that the income effect which leads high-earners to work less partly offsets the substitution effect which stimulates low-earner (previously at the convex kink) to work more.","PeriodicalId":357131,"journal":{"name":"Netspar Research Paper Series","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114287050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrew Ang, Bingxu Chen, W. Goetzmann, Ludovic Phalippou
{"title":"Estimating Private Equity Returns from Limited Partner Cash Flows","authors":"Andrew Ang, Bingxu Chen, W. Goetzmann, Ludovic Phalippou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2460789","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2460789","url":null,"abstract":"We introduce a methodology to estimate the historical time series of returns to investment in private equity. The approach requires only an unbalanced panel of cash contributions and distributions accruing to limited partners, and is robust to sparse data. We decompose private equity returns into a component due to traded factors and a time-varying private equity premium. We find strong cyclicality in the premium component that differs according to fund type. The time-series estimates allow us to directly test theories about private equity cyclicality, and we find evidence in favor of the Kaplan and Stromberg (2009) hypothesis that capital market segmentation helps to determine the private equity premium.","PeriodicalId":357131,"journal":{"name":"Netspar Research Paper Series","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130454763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Social Interactions and the Retirement Age","authors":"N. Vermeer, M. van Rooij, D. van Vuuren","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2572872","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2572872","url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we gauge the impact of social interactions on individual retirement preferences. A survey including self-assessments and vignette questions shows that individual preferences are affected by preferences and actual retirement behavior of the social environment. Retirement from paid work depends on the retirement age of relatives, friends, colleagues and acquaintances. Information and advice provided by the social environment play a role in the retirement decision. A majority of respondents would postpone retirement when their social environment retires later. A one year increase in the social environment’s retirement age leads to an average increase of three months in the individual retirement age. In addition, people tend to stick more to the state pension age than to other retirement ages, which suggests a norm about retirement at the state pension age.","PeriodicalId":357131,"journal":{"name":"Netspar Research Paper Series","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122025413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Value-Based Approach to the Redesign of US State Pension Plans","authors":"Z. Lekniute, R. Beetsma, Eduard H. M. Ponds","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2438637","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2438637","url":null,"abstract":"We explore the nancial sustainability of a typical U.S. state civil servants pension fund under the continuation of current policies and under alternative policies, such as changes in contribution, indexation and investment allocation policies. Applying the value-based asset-liability management method, we nd that all participant cohorts derive substantial net benet from the current pension contract, while all tax-paying cohorts have to make substantial contributions. The proposed adjustment measures can alleviate a substantial part of the burden on tax payers, although at the cost of the fund participants. Especially a policy of conditional ination indexation seems promising.","PeriodicalId":357131,"journal":{"name":"Netspar Research Paper Series","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133603222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}