Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology最新文献_第6页

Bright Ideas: HTM Team Demonstrates Value by Tracking 'Soft Savings'. 光明的想法：HTM团队通过跟踪“软节约”来展示价值。

Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI: 10.2345/0899-8205-53.6.454

C. Hayhurst

引用次数: 0

The Roundup. 摘要。

Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI: 10.2345/0899-8205-53.6.404

引用次数: 0

Roundtable Discussion: Gaining Proficiency in the Use of Complex Health Technology Requires a Multifaceted Training Approach. 圆桌讨论：熟练使用复杂的卫生技术需要多方面的培训方法。

Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI: 10.2345/0899-8205-53.6.444

Joseph Sheffer, Gerard Castro, Genoveffa Devers, J. Stifter, Rachel R Vitoux

{"title":"Roundtable Discussion: Gaining Proficiency in the Use of Complex Health Technology Requires a Multifaceted Training Approach.","authors":"Joseph Sheffer, Gerard Castro, Genoveffa Devers, J. Stifter, Rachel R Vitoux","doi":"10.2345/0899-8205-53.6.444","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-53.6.444","url":null,"abstract":"Janet Stifter We are going through a large, complex technology changeover at Rush University Medical Center. Therefore, many of my remarks today may be somewhat colored by the experience we are having currently. I would say that there is a great deal of cognitive burden experienced by health professionals related to complex technology. When you are changing out devices and potentially going to another vendor, or sometimes even when you're upgrading a model with the same vendor, I don't think you can assume that the old and new devices will be “apples to apples.” For example, if I'm working with a bed, and I go from a bed from one vendor to a bed from another vendor, the way the mechanics work is not going to be the same and the capability in terms of reporting that's going to come through your electronic medical record (EMR) is also potentially not going to be the same. It's not an apples-to-apples kind of opportunity. There's a learning phase related to staff use of complex technology, but in some instances, there is also an unlearning phase. That's because I've been working, for example, with a certain ventilator in the past, and I know how to set the dials and the alarms. When I get a new ventilator, potentially from another company, I will have to unlearn what I was doing with the old ventilator and now relearn how to use the new piece of technology. The other concern leading to cognitive burden is the pressure in healthcare to be safe and to ensure high quality in terms of our outcomes. So, when you're working with complex technology, and you have the potential to harm somebody if you are not using that technology appropriately or safely, that's also a big burden in terms of really trying to make sure that you understand what you are doing and use the technology appropriately. In terms of what amount of proficiency is reasonable to expect when onboarding technology, that is another interesting issue that we have been grappling with as part of our current technology go-live at Rush. We have spent a lot of time talking to users at other organizations about some of the difficulties our team has been experiencing with use of this new technology and have found similar concerns at some of these other organizations. Over time, we've gotten the sense that there has been almost an acceptance that people will be proficient but not expert users in terms of being able to manage this device—that the use of this technology is not necessarily going to reach the highest levels of quality or safety. Again using the example of a ventilator: Is proficiency being able to identify the buttons and what they do? Or, do we set a higher standard related to efficiency and effectiveness for staff? What if staff is not able to reach that standard? What if I have a staff member who is potentially creating a workaround to make a piece of equipment more efficient or effective? This demonstrates how difficult it is to define proficiency, especially when you're looking at t","PeriodicalId":35656,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","volume":"53 6 1","pages":"444-451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46415299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Final Word: Designing Medical Devices for Failure. 最后一句话：为失败设计医疗器械。

Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI: 10.2345/0899-8205-53.6.470

Rebekah Friedrich, J. Custer

引用次数: 1

Feature: Innovative Health Technology Emerges from Rice University's Oshman Design Kitchen. 特色：创新健康技术从莱斯大学的奥斯曼设计厨房中脱颖而出。

Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI: 10.2345/0899-8205-53.6.434

M. Crawford

引用次数: 0

People Are Saying. 人们在说。

Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI: 10.2345/0899-8205-53.6.410

引用次数: 0

Ask The Joint Commission. 问问联合委员会。

Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI: 10.2345/0899-8205-53.6.411

引用次数: 0

Frontlines: Moving the Needle Toward Cyber Transparency. 前线：将指针移向网络透明。

Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Pub Date : 2019-11-01 DOI: 10.2345/0899-8205-53.6.402

Joseph Sheffer

引用次数: 0

Full Issue. 完整的问题。

Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Pub Date : 2019-10-29 DOI: 10.33884/commed.v4i1.1466

Jurnal Commed

引用次数: 0

Roundtable Discussion: Sterile Processing: Innovating through Standardization. 圆桌讨论：无菌加工：通过标准化进行创新。

Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Pub Date : 2019-09-16 DOI: 10.2345/0899-8205-53.5.364

Joseph Sheffer, Damien S Berg, J. Burdach, Horlando Cintron, M. Elammari, Cheron M Rojo

引用次数: 0