European Science Editing最新文献_第4页

Publications on COVID-19 from Vietnam during 2020 and 2021: A bibliometric analysis 2020年和2021年越南关于COVID-19的出版物:文献计量学分析

European Science Editing Pub Date : 2022-12-09 DOI: 10.3897/ese.2022.e83724

Van Luong Nguyen, D. Luong, Hiep-Hung Pham

{"title":" Publications on COVID-19 from Vietnam during 2020 and 2021: A bibliometric analysis","authors":"Van Luong Nguyen, D. Luong, Hiep-Hung Pham","doi":"10.3897/ese.2022.e83724","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2022.e83724","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, published research from Vietnam related to the pandemic was analysed using bibliometrics.\u0000 Objectives: To examine the status of research on COVID-19 by authors from Vietnam.\u0000 Methods: The following bibliometric aspects were considered in the analysis: international collaboration, institutions from Vietnam and their partner institutions worldwide, subjects and topics, types of documents, and individual authors. The basis of the study was data obtained from the Scopus database between 2020 and 2021. The data were analysed using Microsoft Excel, R, and VOSviewer, and the emerging trends illustrated through descriptive analysis and science mapping. \u0000 Results: Between 2020 and 2021, researchers from Vietnam co-authored 1034 documents related to COVID-19, amounting to 0.35% of the total of 296,148 such documents published worldwide as ascertained from the Scopus database. Vietnam’s top country collaborators in that research were USA, Australia, the United Kingdom, India, and Taiwan ROC. The top Vietnam institutions were Duy Tan University, Ton Duc Thang University, and the University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City. The research from Vietnam covered many subjects, from medicine and natural sciences to social sciences and economics. Eight clusters of topics related to COVID-19 were identified. In terms of citations, the most highly cited documents were the outcome of collaboration with international authors. Lastly, the study ranked top authors based on either the number of publications or the number of citations. \u0000 Conclusion: This study provides a preliminary picture of studies related to COVID-19 co-authored by researchers in Vietnam. The picture may help the Vietnam government in devising appropriate strategies for post-COVID-19 restoration of the country’s socio-economic status.","PeriodicalId":35360,"journal":{"name":"European Science Editing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42373676","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

How editors can help authors write better papers: Beyond journals and articles 编辑如何帮助作者写出更好的论文：超越期刊和文章

European Science Editing Pub Date : 2022-11-28 DOI: 10.3897/ese.2022.e95247

A. Marušić, M. Marusic

引用次数: 0

Scientific abstracts: Texts, contexts, and subtexts 科学摘要:文本、语境和潜台词

European Science Editing Pub Date : 2022-11-21 DOI: 10.3897/ese.2022.e85616

T. A. Lang

引用次数: 0

Country information in titles – equality or equity 标题中的国家/地区信息——平等或公平

European Science Editing Pub Date : 2022-10-13 DOI: 10.3897/ese.2022.e89445

Kate Wilson

引用次数: 0

The Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines: Implementation and checklist development 研究中的性别和性别公平（SAGER）指南：实施和清单制定

European Science Editing Pub Date : 2022-10-05 DOI: 10.3897/ese.2022.e86910

Heather L. Van Epps, O. Astudillo, Yaiza del Pozo Martín, J. Marsh

{"title":"The Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines: Implementation and checklist development","authors":"Heather L. Van Epps, O. Astudillo, Yaiza del Pozo Martín, J. Marsh","doi":"10.3897/ese.2022.e86910","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2022.e86910","url":null,"abstract":"Understanding sex and gender differences is fundamental to rigorous and inclusive research, whether studying disease pathophysiology, sociodemographic determinants of health, or the benefits and harms of medical or social interventions. The inclusion of gender-diverse study populations has improved, but the reporting of sex and gender variables in research is still incomplete. The Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines, published in 2016, have been widely endorsed, but few scientific journals and organizations have incorporated them into formal editorial guidance and publication policies. To facilitate monitoring of and adherence to the SAGER guidelines in Lancet journals, we carried out an informal pilot study and developed a checklist to enable rapid editorial checks, promote uptake of the guidelines by other editors and journals, and raise awareness among peer reviewers and authors. By using this checklist as part of manuscript assessment and peer-review processes, journal editors can support best reporting practices when considering sex and gender as variables, improving the generalizability of the research they publish.","PeriodicalId":35360,"journal":{"name":"European Science Editing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46677477","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Anonymity in anonymized peer review is incompatible with preprints 匿名同行评审中的匿名与预印本不兼容

European Science Editing Pub Date : 2022-10-03 DOI: 10.3897/ese.2022.e91290

J. A. Teixeira da Silva

引用次数: 2

Equity in reporting settings of studies 研究报告环境的公平性

European Science Editing Pub Date : 2022-09-07 DOI: 10.3897/ese.2022.e87545

D. Knipe, R. Jewkes

引用次数: 3

Stop paying to be published Open Access - a French perspective 停止为开放获取出版付费——法国人的观点

European Science Editing Pub Date : 2022-08-22 DOI: 10.3897/ese.2022.e90113

O. Pourret

引用次数: 2

How much do Romanian medical students know about research ethics? A survey 罗马尼亚医科学生对研究伦理了解多少?一项调查显示

European Science Editing Pub Date : 2022-07-21 DOI: 10.3897/ese.2022.e76261

O. Andronic, A. Bolocan, D. Păduraru, D. Ion, F. Musat

{"title":"How much do Romanian medical students know about research ethics? A survey","authors":"O. Andronic, A. Bolocan, D. Păduraru, D. Ion, F. Musat","doi":"10.3897/ese.2022.e76261","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2022.e76261","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Although scientific research in Romania has continued to expand over the past 20 years, it is unclear how prepared the country’s students are to be involved in research and to publish the results of their work.\u0000 Objectives: To assess Romanian medical students’ level of knowledge about research integrity and research ethics.\u0000 Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 187 medical students (of which 70% were women) from Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania, was performed between September 2017 and June 2018. The survey consisted of self-evaluation with respect to three aspects, namely knowledge of research in general, that of research integrity, and that of publication integrity. The self-evaluation was followed by a set of 17 questions that tested the respondent’s knowledge.\u0000 Results: On average, the proportion of correct answers was 34% (range, 12%–65%). Whereas those who had assigned low grades to themselves (a score below 5) fared poorly (fewer correct answers) in the test that followed, those who rated themselves highly (a score of 5 or higher) did not fare as well as they were expected to. The majority of respondents (83%) were willing to learn more about research integrity through courses, workshops, training programmes, etc.\u0000 Conclusion: The respondents showed a low level of knowledge related to both research integrity and current standards of reporting scientific research. This lacuna demonstrates the need to train students at the beginning of their academic life because more and more of them, both undergraduate and postgraduate, are likely to be involved in scientific research.","PeriodicalId":35360,"journal":{"name":"European Science Editing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41826133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Trends in the proportion of women as reviewers, editors, and editorial board members of 15 North American and British medical journals from 2014 to 2019: A retrospective study 2014年至2019年，15份北美和英国医学期刊的女性审稿人、编辑和编委会成员比例趋势：一项回顾性研究

European Science Editing Pub Date : 2022-07-05 DOI: 10.3897/ese.2022.e80709

Roxanna Wang, R. Roberts, J. Fredenburgh, M. Cushman, J. Weitz

{"title":"Trends in the proportion of women as reviewers, editors, and editorial board members of 15 North American and British medical journals from 2014 to 2019: A retrospective study","authors":"Roxanna Wang, R. Roberts, J. Fredenburgh, M. Cushman, J. Weitz","doi":"10.3897/ese.2022.e80709","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2022.e80709","url":null,"abstract":"Background and objective: There is persistent men-dominated gender disparity in medical academia. Predominance of men in the editorial makeup of medical journals might contribute to this inequity. This retrospective study (2014–2019)\u0000 sought to evaluate gender representation in reviewers, editors, and members of the editorial boards in 15 leading medical journals from the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.\u0000 Methods: We surveyed lists of reviewers, editors, and editorial board members from seven journals of internal medicine, a specialty dominated by men; three journals of obstetrics and gynaecology and two of paediatrics, specialties dominated by women; and three journals of psychiatry, a gender-balanced specialty. Information from publicly available resources was used to infer gender, and the percentages of women were calculated. Trends over time were characterized by changes in these percentages from year to year through the linear regression line fitted to the data for each journal.\u0000 Results: Journals of women-dominated specialties had significantly higher proportions of women reviewers than those of men-dominated or gender-balanced specialties, with mean percentages (95% confidence interval) of 45.8% (40.5%–51.1%), 28.0% (22.3%–33.7%), and 33.8% (27.6%–40.1%), respectively (p <0.001). The proportion of women editors and editorial board members showed no statistically significant differences across the three specialties, and the percentage of women reviewers, editors, and editorial board members increased only slightly over time.\u0000 Conclusion: These results suggest that the fifteen journals are yet to achieve gender parity in their reviewers, editors, and editorial board members, and continued efforts are needed to achieve gender balance in those three groups of medical academia.","PeriodicalId":35360,"journal":{"name":"European Science Editing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45832199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0