Luther, Barth, and Movements of Theological Renewal (1918-1933)最新文献

Martin Buber between Revelation and Scripture Martin Buber在启示录和圣经之间

Luther, Barth, and Movements of Theological Renewal (1918-1933) Pub Date : 2020-08-10 DOI: 10.1515/9783110612066-007

引用次数: 0

Trinity, Incarnation, Political Theology 三位一体，化身，政治神学

Luther, Barth, and Movements of Theological Renewal (1918-1933) Pub Date : 2020-08-10 DOI: 10.1515/9783110612066-012

引用次数: 0

Werner Elert and Hans Joachim Iwand – Political Theology and Theology of the Cross 沃纳·埃勒特和汉斯·约阿希姆·伊万德:《政治神学与十字架神学》

Luther, Barth, and Movements of Theological Renewal (1918-1933) Pub Date : 2020-08-10 DOI: 10.1515/9783110612066-013

引用次数: 0

Desperatio Fiducialis

Luther, Barth, and Movements of Theological Renewal (1918-1933) Pub Date : 2020-08-10 DOI: 10.1515/9783110612066-009

引用次数: 0

Theologia paradoxa, theologia crucis

Luther, Barth, and Movements of Theological Renewal (1918-1933) Pub Date : 2020-08-10 DOI: 10.1515/9783110612066-010

引用次数: 0

Luther’s Lectures on Romans in the Work of Karl Holl, Rudolf Hermann, and Karl Barth 在卡尔·霍尔、鲁道夫·赫尔曼和卡尔·巴特的著作中，路德关于罗马人的演讲

Luther, Barth, and Movements of Theological Renewal (1918-1933) Pub Date : 2020-08-10 DOI: 10.1515/9783110612066-005

引用次数: 0

The Man who became God or the God who became Man? 是成为上帝的人，还是成为人类的上帝?

Luther, Barth, and Movements of Theological Renewal (1918-1933) Pub Date : 2020-08-10 DOI: 10.1515/9783110612066-011

引用次数: 0

Luther and Mysticism 路德与神秘主义

Luther, Barth, and Movements of Theological Renewal (1918-1933) Pub Date : 2020-08-10 DOI: 10.1515/9783110612066-008

引用次数: 0

Karl Barth on Kant’s “Biblical Theology” A Reading with Hermann Cohen 卡尔·巴特论康德的“圣经神学”——与赫尔曼·科恩一起解读

Luther, Barth, and Movements of Theological Renewal (1918-1933) Pub Date : 2020-08-10 DOI: 10.1515/9783110612066-003

引用次数: 0

The Religious A Priori in Otto and its Kantian Origins 奥托的宗教先验性及其康德起源

Luther, Barth, and Movements of Theological Renewal (1918-1933) Pub Date : 2020-08-10 DOI: 10.1515/9783110612066-004

Jacqueline Mariña

{"title":"The Religious A Priori in Otto and its Kantian Origins","authors":"Jacqueline Mariña","doi":"10.1515/9783110612066-004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110612066-004","url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an analysis of Rudolph Otto’s understanding of the structures of human consciousness making possible the appropriation of revelation. Already in his dissertation on Luther’s understanding of the Holy Spirit, Otto was preoccupied with how the “outer” of revelation could be united to these inner structures. Later, in his groundbreaking Idea of the Holy, Otto would explore the category of the numinous, an element of religious experience tied to the irrational element of the holy. This paper first provides a brief account of Otto’s account of the holy, especially its numinous, irrational elements. Second, the paper analyzes Otto’s understanding of the structures of consciousness grounding the experience of the numinous and allowing the irrational element to be “schematized” by the rational element. Otto’s exposition of these structures is heavily influenced by his reception of Kant’s analysis of the two stems of human cognition, namely understanding and sensibility, and their possible relation to a common root, which Otto identified with what the mystics called the ground of the soul. Yet it is in Otto’s reception of Kant’s Critique of Judgment that all of these ideas find their completion, and it is here where we must look to understand the relation between the religious a priori and Otto’s category of the numinous. Kant’s aesthetic idea is a singular representation given in intuition; it is infinitely saturated and as such intimates the ideas of God, the soul, and the world as a whole. I show how Otto appropriates Kant’s aesthetic idea and its relation to ideas of reason in order to make sense of how an empirically given revelation, for instance, an experience of the numinous, can connect with the inner structures of consciousness and thereby have the singular import that it does. How can revelation be interpreted and interiorized? This was Otto’s burning question at the heart of his dissertation on Luther’s understanding of the Holy Spirit. There he had, among other things, reflected on two propositions from the Lutheran catechism: “The Holy Spirit does not work without means; he is bound to the Word and works through the Word.”1 Otto struggled with the validity and intelligibility of the propositions on several fronts. First, of itself the Word is not a sufficient condition of faith; it is only opened up through the Spirit, remaining dead to the natural human being. But insofar as the work of the Holy Spirit precedes, accompanies, and makes possible the understanding of the Word, this is a “work of the Spirit before the Word,” and is, as such, an action of the Spirit “without means,” (45) contradicting the first part of the formula. Second, Otto questions the intelligibility of the notion that the Holy Spirit works through the Word. This amounts to the claim that one energy works through another, and is just as nonsensical as the claim that light gives out its light","PeriodicalId":350055,"journal":{"name":"Luther, Barth, and Movements of Theological Renewal (1918-1933)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122696784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0