The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech最新文献_第2页

The Classic Arguments for Free Speech 1644–1927 言论自由的经典论点1644-1927

The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827580.013.2

V. Blasi

{"title":"The Classic Arguments for Free Speech 1644–1927","authors":"V. Blasi","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827580.013.2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827580.013.2","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the classic arguments for freedom of speech. It traces the first comprehensive argument for freedom of speech as a limiting principle of government to John Milton’s Areopagitica, a polemic against censorship by a requirement of prior licensing in which Milton develops an argument for the pursuit of truth through exposure to false and heretical ideas rather than the passive reception of orthodoxy. Despite Milton’s belief in the advancement of understanding through free inquiry, he was far from liberal in the modern sense of that term and he did not, for instance, extend the tolerance he advocated to Catholic religious texts. The chapter then assesses what James Madison had to say about the role of public opinion as a crucial element in the creation of political authority and the preservation of rights, and considers Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr’s opinions about the freedom of speech. It also looks at how the celebrated federal judge Learned Hand conceives of the freedom of speech as a majority-creating procedure rather than an individual right, while Justice Louis Brandeis understood the freedom of speech to be an individual liberty important as such but especially important for its contribution to democratic character. Ultimately, the most widely-read of the classic arguments for free speech is that developed by John Stuart Mill in his Essay On Liberty.","PeriodicalId":348867,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131207514","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Structure of a Free Speech Right 言论自由权的结构

The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827580.013.13

Stephen A. Gardbaum

引用次数: 1

Freedom of Media 媒体自由

The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827580.013.30

Dieter Grimm

{"title":"Freedom of Media","authors":"Dieter Grimm","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827580.013.30","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827580.013.30","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explains that in a number of jurisdictions, freedom of media is treated as a subset of freedom of speech. It is speech amplified by technical means such as print or electromagnetic waves. Like freedom of speech, it is conceived as an individual right of the speaker. It is also regarded as a right of the owners of media, even if they do not speak themselves, because they may determine what is published and what is not. However, freedom of media should be regarded as a distinct right. Both rights share the quality of communicative rights, but they refer to different types of communication, individual communication and mass communication. When the early constitutions were adopted, no other means of mass communication than the press existed. Younger constitutions mention broadcasting, but did not foresee the emergence of television; even very recent constitutions remain silent regarding the internet. However, only an extremely crude textualist or originalist would conclude that media not explicitly mentioned in the constitution are not protected against government intrusion. ‘Press’ is a subcategory of the broader notion of ‘media of mass communication’ and thus open for the inclusion of newly emerging media without a constitutional amendment being necessary.","PeriodicalId":348867,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123296891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Positive Free Speech: A Democratic Freedom 积极的言论自由:民主的自由

The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827580.013.14

A. Kenyon

引用次数: 1

When Is Speech That Causes Unlawful Conduct Protected by Freedom of Speech? The Case of the First Amendment? 导致非法行为的言论何时受到言论自由的保护?第一修正案的案例?

The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827580.013.19

G. Stone

引用次数: 0

Pornography 色情

The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827580.013.34

Caroline West

引用次数: 0

Defamation Law, Sullivan, and the Shape of Free Speech 诽谤法，沙利文和言论自由的形态

The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827580.013.16

A. Kenyon

{"title":"Defamation Law, Sullivan, and the Shape of Free Speech","authors":"A. Kenyon","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827580.013.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827580.013.16","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines how free speech interacts with defamation law. When thinking about defamation law and free speech, it can be difficult not to consider the classic US case of New York Times v Sullivan. The decision substantially changed how US defamation law treats political speech, and has resonated widely in other jurisdictions. It increased the burdens facing public officials who sue in defamation, making it far more difficult for them to succeed. The chapter draws out two broad issues from Sullivan and subsequent decisions which have relevance for understanding defamation and free speech more generally, especially democratic aspects of freedom of expression. It also highlights three ways in which the reform of defamation law could better protect free speech. First, legal doctrine could be reformed. Second, remedies could be altered to reduce the chill of defamation law. Third, and perhaps less often recognized, the effective degree of freedom of speech provided under any given defamation law depends greatly on litigation practice. Reforming defamation litigation has been tried in many jurisdictions and there have long been proposals for larger reforms, such as developing alternative dispute resolution methods and venues for defamation claims.","PeriodicalId":348867,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech","volume":"2016 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121339910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Internet and Social Media 互联网和社交媒体

The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech Pub Date : 2021-01-26 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198827580.013.20

Gregory P. Magarian

引用次数: 0

Free Speech and Elections 言论自由与选举

The Oxford Handbook of Freedom of Speech Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI: 10.1017/9781108859561.007

Joo-cheong Tham, K. Ewing

引用次数: 0