The Rights Paradox最新文献

The Group Antipathy Theory of Supreme Court Legitimacy 最高法院合法性的群体反感理论

The Rights Paradox Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI: 10.1017/9781108937764.002

Michael A. Zilis

引用次数: 0

Appendix 附录

The Rights Paradox Pub Date : 2018-12-31 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvkwnqg0.12

Xueqing Deng, Dawei Sun, S. Newsam, Peng Wang

{"title":"Appendix","authors":"Xueqing Deng, Dawei Sun, S. Newsam, Peng Wang","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvkwnqg0.12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkwnqg0.12","url":null,"abstract":"In this section, we present the implementation details on the experiments performed on transformer. We select ViT-B [2] with patch size of 16 as our teacher model and DeiT-Tiny [4] as our student model. We reproduce the baseline result with 4 GPUs and the total batch size is 1024. However, for searching the distillation process, we have to reduce the batch size to 256 due to limited GPU memory as we have pathways between the feature maps from teacher and student. Meanwhile, we keep the same batch size for retraining after searching. The most significant difference between the implementations of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformers is the transform block. Our experimental results show that the proposed transform block on CNNs is not applicable to transformer yielding much worse performance on distillation compared to non-distillation. Therefore, we employ a transformer-style block to serve as a transform block for feature transfer between the teacher and student whose architectures are transformers as shown in Fig. 1. We follow similar search pipeline with a search learning rate of 1e-3. Once the distillation process is obtained, we train the models with 150 epochs for both ReviewKD [1] and our proposed DistPro following the same configurations in DeiT [4].","PeriodicalId":347866,"journal":{"name":"The Rights Paradox","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127874399","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Opening the Floodgates 打开闸门

The Rights Paradox Pub Date : 2016-02-13 DOI: 10.1017/9781108937764.004

Homi K. Bhabha

{"title":"Opening the Floodgates","authors":"Homi K. Bhabha","doi":"10.1017/9781108937764.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108937764.004","url":null,"abstract":"The very title of this book demands that we begin to revalue the progress of contemporary post-structuralist theory by standing outside its \"modernist\" European canon-Mallarm6, Joyce, Bataille, Beckett, Celine. Black Literature and Literary Theory attempts not only to articulate the former in terms of the latter; to apply the rules of an innovative, adversarial method to the \"miscreants\" of its culture to produce an alternative counter-culture. For the theoretical problem raised by the title of this volume-implicit in the essays themselves-is resistant to the polarities and complicities of \"culture and counter-culture.\" Black Literature, with its Afro-American heritage is implacably \"two-toned\" or double-voiced as Gates and his band of improvising, innovating contrapunctualists ably demonstrate. What is black, as cultural sign or social text, cannot be contained within an essentialist or Romantic myth of the literary as the expression of \"authenticity and sincerity,\" as Trilling called it. Nor will it be appropriately represented in those grand nineteenth century narratives of social, national mimesis. Blackness, these writers insist, is itself a signifying trope with origins in the Yoruba figure of the Signifying Monkey and its tradition of Trickster Tales, revised and relocated in those re-sounding repetitions of the oral traditions of slave narratives. What emerges is an Afro-American \"indeterminacy\" that has a natural affinity with the post-structuralist trope of textuality as double inscription, or dissemination. Blackness, like the signifier, is neither the One thing nor the Other; its doubleness, traditionally misread as the duplicitous utterance of slave and native, breaks the mold of the binary divisions of Subject (Self/Other) and Sign (Signifier/ Signified). Like the differance of signification itself, Blackness becomes the trope of the entre, playing its tricks of meaning and","PeriodicalId":347866,"journal":{"name":"The Rights Paradox","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132504944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Index 指数

The Rights Paradox Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/9781108937764.011

引用次数: 0

Experimental Tests of the Group Antipathy Model 群体反感模型的实验检验

The Rights Paradox Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/9781108937764.005

引用次数: 0

Group Antipathy and Strategic Behavior on the Supreme Court 最高法院的群体反感和战略行为

The Rights Paradox Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/9781108937764.007

引用次数: 0

Conclusion 结论

The Rights Paradox Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.1017/9781108937764.008

引用次数: 0