Opening the Floodgates

Homi K. Bhabha
{"title":"Opening the Floodgates","authors":"Homi K. Bhabha","doi":"10.1017/9781108937764.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The very title of this book demands that we begin to revalue the progress of contemporary post-structuralist theory by standing outside its \"modernist\" European canon-Mallarm6, Joyce, Bataille, Beckett, Celine. Black Literature and Literary Theory attempts not only to articulate the former in terms of the latter; to apply the rules of an innovative, adversarial method to the \"miscreants\" of its culture to produce an alternative counter-culture. For the theoretical problem raised by the title of this volume-implicit in the essays themselves-is resistant to the polarities and complicities of \"culture and counter-culture.\" Black Literature, with its Afro-American heritage is implacably \"two-toned\" or double-voiced as Gates and his band of improvising, innovating contrapunctualists ably demonstrate. What is black, as cultural sign or social text, cannot be contained within an essentialist or Romantic myth of the literary as the expression of \"authenticity and sincerity,\" as Trilling called it. Nor will it be appropriately represented in those grand nineteenth century narratives of social, national mimesis. Blackness, these writers insist, is itself a signifying trope with origins in the Yoruba figure of the Signifying Monkey and its tradition of Trickster Tales, revised and relocated in those re-sounding repetitions of the oral traditions of slave narratives. What emerges is an Afro-American \"indeterminacy\" that has a natural affinity with the post-structuralist trope of textuality as double inscription, or dissemination. Blackness, like the signifier, is neither the One thing nor the Other; its doubleness, traditionally misread as the duplicitous utterance of slave and native, breaks the mold of the binary divisions of Subject (Self/Other) and Sign (Signifier/ Signified). Like the differance of signification itself, Blackness becomes the trope of the entre, playing its tricks of meaning and","PeriodicalId":347866,"journal":{"name":"The Rights Paradox","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Rights Paradox","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108937764.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The very title of this book demands that we begin to revalue the progress of contemporary post-structuralist theory by standing outside its "modernist" European canon-Mallarm6, Joyce, Bataille, Beckett, Celine. Black Literature and Literary Theory attempts not only to articulate the former in terms of the latter; to apply the rules of an innovative, adversarial method to the "miscreants" of its culture to produce an alternative counter-culture. For the theoretical problem raised by the title of this volume-implicit in the essays themselves-is resistant to the polarities and complicities of "culture and counter-culture." Black Literature, with its Afro-American heritage is implacably "two-toned" or double-voiced as Gates and his band of improvising, innovating contrapunctualists ably demonstrate. What is black, as cultural sign or social text, cannot be contained within an essentialist or Romantic myth of the literary as the expression of "authenticity and sincerity," as Trilling called it. Nor will it be appropriately represented in those grand nineteenth century narratives of social, national mimesis. Blackness, these writers insist, is itself a signifying trope with origins in the Yoruba figure of the Signifying Monkey and its tradition of Trickster Tales, revised and relocated in those re-sounding repetitions of the oral traditions of slave narratives. What emerges is an Afro-American "indeterminacy" that has a natural affinity with the post-structuralist trope of textuality as double inscription, or dissemination. Blackness, like the signifier, is neither the One thing nor the Other; its doubleness, traditionally misread as the duplicitous utterance of slave and native, breaks the mold of the binary divisions of Subject (Self/Other) and Sign (Signifier/ Signified). Like the differance of signification itself, Blackness becomes the trope of the entre, playing its tricks of meaning and
打开闸门
正是这本书的标题要求我们站在“现代主义”的欧洲经典——马拉姆、乔伊斯、巴塔耶、贝克特、塞琳——之外,重新审视当代后结构主义理论的进展。黑人文学和文学理论不仅试图用后者来表达前者;将一种创新的、对抗性的方法的规则应用于其文化中的“恶棍”,以产生另一种反文化。因为这本书的标题所提出的理论问题——隐含在文章本身——是抵制“文化和反文化”的两极和复杂性的。黑人文学有着非裔美国人的传统,不可避免地具有“双调”或双调,正如盖茨和他的即兴创作、创新的反时机主义乐队所表现的那样。什么是黑色,作为文化符号或社会文本,不能包含在本质主义或浪漫主义的文学神话中作为“真实性和真诚”的表达,正如特里林所说的那样。也不会在19世纪那些宏大的社会,国家模仿叙事中恰当地表现出来。这些作家坚持认为,黑色本身就是一种象征的修辞,起源于约鲁巴人的象征猴子形象及其传统的魔术师故事,在奴隶叙述的口头传统的重复中被修改和重新定位。出现的是一种非裔美国人的“不确定性”,它与后结构主义的文本性比喻有一种天然的亲和力,即双重铭文或传播。黑暗,像能指一样,既不是一物也不是他者;它的双重性,传统上被误读为奴隶和本地人的双重话语,打破了主体(自我/他者)和符号(能指/所指)二元划分的模式。就像意义本身的差异一样,黑色成为了中心的修辞,玩弄着它的意义和诡计
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信