2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture最新文献_第3页

Consolidating a Process for the Design, Representation, and Evaluation of Reference Architectures 巩固参考体系结构的设计、表示和评估过程

2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture Pub Date : 2014-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/WICSA.2014.25

E. Nakagawa, Milena Guessi, J. Maldonado, Daniel Feitosa, F. Oquendo

{"title":"Consolidating a Process for the Design, Representation, and Evaluation of Reference Architectures","authors":"E. Nakagawa, Milena Guessi, J. Maldonado, Daniel Feitosa, F. Oquendo","doi":"10.1109/WICSA.2014.25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2014.25","url":null,"abstract":"Reference architectures have emerged as a special type of software architecture that achieves well-recognized understanding of specific domains, promoting reuse of design expertise and facilitating the development, standardization, and evolution of software systems. Because of their advantages, several reference architectures have been proposed and have been also successfully used, including in the industry. However, the most of these architectures are still built using an ad-hoc approach, lacking of a systematization to their construction. If existing, these approaches could motivate and promote the building of new architectures and also support evolution of existing ones. In this scenario, the main contribution of this paper is to present the evolution of ProSA-RA, a process that systematizes the design, representation, and evaluation of reference architectures. ProSA-RA has been already applied in the establishment of reference architectures for different domains and this experience was used to evolve our process. In this paper, we illustrate an application of ProSA-RA in the robotics domain. Results achieved through the use of ProSA-RA have showed us that it is a viable, efficient process and, as a consequence, it could contribute to the reuse of knowledge in several applications domains, by promoting the establishment of new reference architectures.","PeriodicalId":346971,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116353407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 51

Green Architectural Tactics for the Cloud 云的绿色建筑策略

2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture Pub Date : 2014-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/WICSA.2014.30

Giuseppe Procaccianti, P. Lago, G. Lewis

引用次数: 27

Empirical Study of Architectural Knowledge Management Practices 建筑知识管理实践的实证研究

2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture Pub Date : 2014-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/WICSA.2014.28

M. Galster, M. Babar

引用次数: 8

Inconsistency Resolution in Merging Versions of Architectural Models 架构模型合并版本中的不一致解决

2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture Pub Date : 2014-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/WICSA.2014.31

K. Dam, Alexander Reder, Alexander Egyed

{"title":"Inconsistency Resolution in Merging Versions of Architectural Models","authors":"K. Dam, Alexander Reder, Alexander Egyed","doi":"10.1109/WICSA.2014.31","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2014.31","url":null,"abstract":"State-of-the-art optimistic model versioning systems, which are critical to enable efficient team-based development of architectural models, are able to detect and help resolve basic conflicts arising during the merging of model versions. However, it is often overlooked that model merging may also cause severe syntactical and semantic inconsistencies. In this paper, we propose an approach to guide the resolution of inconsistencies detected in a merged architectural model. Our approach automatically finds and presents to the software architects all solutions for resolving all inconsistencies arisen during the merging of model versions. For inconsistencies that pre-exist in the model, our approach is able to suggest exactly which model elements should be changed to resolve them. Our approach is built upon a repair generation which can quickly derive resolutions for an inconsistency by examining its static and dynamic structure and forming concrete repair actions from changes in the versions to be merged. An empirical validation on a range of industrial models has demonstrated that our approach is scalable to both large models and large differences between model versions.","PeriodicalId":346971,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121163909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 16

A Study on Group Decision-Making in Software Architecture 软件体系结构中的群体决策研究

2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture Pub Date : 2014-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/WICSA.2014.15

Smrithi Rekha, H. Muccini

{"title":"A Study on Group Decision-Making in Software Architecture","authors":"Smrithi Rekha, H. Muccini","doi":"10.1109/WICSA.2014.15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2014.15","url":null,"abstract":"When architecting software systems, architects (with the contribution of other stakeholders) make several design decisions. These decisions could be related to the selection of the right components and connectors, the architectural style to be used, the distribution of various components, the deployment of software components into hardware devices, etc. Many methods have been proposed by the research community to help documenting several aspects of architectural design decisions including design alternatives, stakeholder concerns, decisions and the rationale for making such decisions and enhancing the decision-making process. Still, very little has been done to truly understand how architectural design decisions are made by group of practitioners, what information is documented, the tools used for helping documenting and how conflicts are managed. This study, by looking at principles and techniques for group decision making coming from other disciplines, aims to understand: a) how practitioners make group decisions in architecting software systems, b) how practiced group decision-making techniques relate to state-of-the-art techniques, and c) challenges companies face when making architecture-related group decisions. The study is conducted by using a questionnaire distributed to practitioners and researchers involved in group design decisions in industry. The results are used to drive some recommendations to improve the current group design decision process.","PeriodicalId":346971,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127935005","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 27

Model-Based Formalization of Software Architecture Knowledge 基于模型的软件体系结构知识形式化

2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture Pub Date : 2014-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/WICSA.2014.34

Daniel Perovich, M. Bastarrica

{"title":"Model-Based Formalization of Software Architecture Knowledge","authors":"Daniel Perovich, M. Bastarrica","doi":"10.1109/WICSA.2014.34","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2014.34","url":null,"abstract":"Applying architecture knowledge promotes quality, reduces risks, and is crucial to best meet stakeholders' expectations. Current architecture knowledge is vast and ever-growing, however, it is also heterogeneous, diverse, disperse, and expressed at different levels of abstraction and rigor. In practice, architecture design is bounded by the architect's skills, experience, and the subset of knowledge he masters, and it also requires a huge effort to adjust such knowledge to the development scenario. The resulting architecture is therefore not as good as it could be. Moreover, the architect's effort is not repeatable as it is implicitly embedded in the architecture descriptions. Although model-based approaches are being used to capture particular domains and methods, most approaches lack either generality or homogeneity, making it hard to integrate, adapt and apply such knowledge. In this work, we use megamodeling to provide an homogeneous means for capturing architecture knowledge, making it shareable and reusable. We formally define a mapping from key architecture concepts to modeling artifacts. Also, an architecture design scripting language is used to capture the fine-grained design actions, making architecture design repeatable.","PeriodicalId":346971,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124031885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Software Architecture Evaluation in Practice: Retrospective on More Than 50 Architecture Evaluations in Industry 实践中的软件体系结构评估:50多个行业体系结构评估回顾

2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture Pub Date : 2014-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/WICSA.2014.37

J. Knodel, Matthias Naab

引用次数: 18

A Journey through the Land of Model-View-Design Patterns 模型-视图-设计模式之旅

2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture Pub Date : 2014-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/WICSA.2014.13

Artem Syromiatnikov, Danny Weyns

引用次数: 39

Sustaining Agility through Architecture: Experiences from a Joint Research and Development Laboratory 通过架构维持敏捷性:来自联合研究和开发实验室的经验

2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture Pub Date : 2014-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/WICSA.2014.38

Balthasar Weitzel, Dominik Rost, Mathias Scheffe

{"title":"Sustaining Agility through Architecture: Experiences from a Joint Research and Development Laboratory","authors":"Balthasar Weitzel, Dominik Rost, Mathias Scheffe","doi":"10.1109/WICSA.2014.38","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2014.38","url":null,"abstract":"This paper is an experience report of a long running Scrum project, conducted in a collaboration between industry and research, in a so called \"Joint Research and Development Laboratory\". Over time in the collaboration, we experienced a constant decrease in the pace of our development progress. Planning forward only within the limits of single sprints was the main reason for this. It resulted in a degenerating design and therefore a lack of flexibility that affected the agility of our project. Therefore, we introduced the concept of \"epic-architectures\", an architecture design for a coherent group of user stories. Shifting the planning horizon further, across single sprints, helped us to create more stable and reusable concepts and to construct simpler, more elegant, and more maintainable solutions. We were able to significantly reduce the refactoring effort and increase the development speed, without significant overhead. With reporting on our experiences we hope to provide practically applicable guidance on how to integrate lightweight architecting in agile development processes, to sustain agility while creating high quality products.","PeriodicalId":346971,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116915704","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

Agile Software Architecture in Advanced Data Analytics 高级数据分析中的敏捷软件架构

2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture Pub Date : 2014-04-07 DOI: 10.1109/WICSA.2014.16

K. Eric Harper, A. Dagnino

{"title":"Agile Software Architecture in Advanced Data Analytics","authors":"K. Eric Harper, A. Dagnino","doi":"10.1109/WICSA.2014.16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WICSA.2014.16","url":null,"abstract":"Requirements evolve over the development lifecycle of a software project. Agile practices are designed specifically to address this challenge while showing early and continuous progress towards project goals. Applying an agile approach allows stakeholders to adapt the scope and capabilities of a development release to changing market needs. More recently, an agile approach has been recommended for developing the architecture of software systems, enabling the design to support current requirements and early releases while evolving to meet future expectations. Our experience defining emergent software systems to build a product line architecture for advanced data analytics demonstrates the benefits that can be gained from prioritizing work activities and delaying architecture decisions. This paper proposes a process and ontology for agile architecture development. Only the necessary aspects for each evolutionary release are designed and prototyped, as determined by expectations of the identified application domain scenarios. Feedback from implementing the scenarios using the architecture extends our understanding of the requirements and provides the backlog for successive design iterations.","PeriodicalId":346971,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115200995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6