North American Spine Society Journal最新文献

{"title":"Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with or without release of the anterior longitudinal ligament: A single-center, retrospective observational cohort study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100533","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100533","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Transforaminal anterior release (TFAR) is a technical extension of the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) procedure with deliberate release of the anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In a retrospective, single-center observational cohort study, consecutive adult patients undergoing TLIF surgery at L4/L5 and/or L5/S1 between 01/2018 and 12/2022 for degenerative disc disease or deformity were considered. The TFAR group (with ALL release) was compared to a standard TLIF group (without ALL release), matched in a 1:3 ratio. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models were built to estimate the likelihood of any adverse event (AE), reoperation, and excellent/good clinical outcome at 12 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 438 patients, 18 undergoing TFAR were matched to 53 undergoing standard TLIF. TFAR procedures were frequently part of extensive, anterior-posterior or multilevel fusion procedures with longer surgery time and higher blood loss. The rates of intraoperative surgical AEs were similar (16.7 vs. 11.3%, p=.789). The rates and severities of surgical AEs, as well as reoperation rates and clinical outcomes were similar at time of discharge, 90 days, and 12 months postoperatively (all p&gt;.05). TFAR allowed for an increase in total lumbar lordosis of 16.1° and in lumbar lordosis between L4 and S1 of 16.3° at discharge, which was maintained during follow-up. In both the uni- and multivariable models, patients undergoing TFAR were as likely as patients undergoing standard TLIF to experience any AE (adjusted OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.21–2.94), any reoperation (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.11–1.90) or excellent/good clinical outcome at 12 months (aOR 2.01, 95% CI 0.52–7.74).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The TFAR technique has a safety profile which is comparable to the standard TLIF procedure, but it allows for a greater restoration of lumbar lordosis at L4-S1. We suggest considering the TFAR technique in selected patients with sagittal imbalance and mobile segments for restoration of lumbar lordosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424002269/pdfft?md5=0f7928583067e692e2bff11591633cb5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424002269-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142049790","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Alignment in motion: Fall risk in spine patients and the effect of vision, support surface, and adaptation on the cone of economy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100532","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100532","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Several assessment tools have been developed to estimate a patient's likelihood risk of falling. None of these measures estimate the contributions of the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems to fall risk, especially in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disease.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Degenerative lumbar spine patients with radiculopathy (LD) and healthy subjects who were 35-70 years old without spine complaints were recruited. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected prior to testing. Fall risk assessment was completed using Computer Dynamic Posturography (CDP), a computer-controlled balance machine that allows cone of economy (CoE) and cone of pressure (CoP) measurements. All patients completed Sensory Organization Tests (SOT) which include normal and perturbed stability, both with and without visual cues.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 43 spine patients and 12 healthy controls were included, with mean age 57.8 years, 39.5% females, and mean BMI of 29.3 kg/m². Nearly all CoE and most CoP dimensions were found to be larger in LD patients compared to controls across nearly all subtests (p&lt;.05), with the largest dimensions generally observed in the surrounding and support sway testing condition. In LD patients, ODI and PROMIS Pain Interference were negatively correlated with CoE and CoP measurements (p&lt;.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this prospective study, body sway was assessed as a function of CoE and CoP using the CDP system and was found to be elevated in spine patients, especially when they experienced increasing levels of visual and vestibular stimulation. The ability to identify the primary drivers of balance disorders is essential in spine patients and may be helpful in the development of a patient-specific treatment plan, which may in the future aid with fall-prevention initiatives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424002257/pdfft?md5=253b6b3a165cce6b171847daef5ed832&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424002257-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141844180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Lateral lumbar and thoracic interbody fusion (LLIF) for thoracolumbar spine trauma (Trauma LLIF): A single-center, retrospective observational cohort study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100534","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100534","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Pain, disability and progressive kyphosis is a common problem after traumatic injury of the thoracolumbar (TL-) junction. Surgical treatment may include long-segment posterior or short-segment anterior-posterior fusion. We aim to report our experience with the application of short-segment posterior instrumented fusion with anterior column support using lateral lumbar or thoracic interbody (LLIF) cages.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this retrospective, single-center observational cohort study we included consecutive patients treated surgically for traumatic injury of the TL-junction (Th10/11-L2/3) by posterior instrumentation/fusion and LLIF. We measured segmental kyphosis, complications, and outcomes until last follow-up (about 3 years postoperative).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 61 patients (mean age 39.0 years [SD 13.3]; 23 females [37.7%]) with A3 fractures without (n=48; 78.7%) or with additional sagittal split component n=11; 18.0%. Additional posterior tension band injury was present in n=26 (42.6%). The affected levels of injury were Th12/L1 in n=25 (41.0%) and Th11/12 in n=22 (36.1%). The segmental kyphotic angle was 14.6° (6.7°) preoperative and remained significantly reduced at all times of follow-up at discharge (5.4°±5.5°; p&lt;.001), at 90 days (7.2°±5.5°; p&lt;.001), after partial hardware removal (7.2°±6.0°; p&lt;.001) and at last follow-up (8.1°±6.3°; p&lt;.001). We noticed a tendency for less progression of kyphosis in the group with 2-staged, compared to single-staged bisegmental surgery (mean difference (MD) 3.1° after partial hardware removal, p=.064). During follow-up, n=11 experienced complications (18%), n=58 (95.1%) had an excellent or good outcome and solid fusion was noticed in n=60 (98.4%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>“Trauma LLIF” should be considered as possibility for short-segment anterior-posterior fusion for injuries of the TL- junction. We observed most reproducible and long-lasting kyphosis reduction with a temporary bisegmental, 2-staged procedure resulting in monosegmental fusion (posterior instrumentation/fusion with delayed LLIF and partial hardware removal to release the noninjured caudal motion segment).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424002270/pdfft?md5=db34420ae95c53ca6b74075f99529c75&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424002270-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141840891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Case report of minimally invasive spinal endoscopic debridement and pedicle screw fixation for severe spinal infection of the lumbosacral spine","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100530","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100530","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Surgical treatment of spinal infections, refractory to medical treatments, is increasing in incidence. Here, we present a unique case of discitis secondary to an iatrogenic cause, spinal steroid injection, that resulted in acute neurology, ventral phlegmon, and osteomyelitis requiring multiple surgical interventions for treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Case Description</h3><p>With the adoption of minimally invasive spinal surgery, the patient underwent full endoscopic debridement and decompression at our hospital. The endoscopic technique offers a unique avenue to the anatomically difficult ventral phlegmon for surgical excision, cultures, and pathogen identification. The endoscopic debridement was paired with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation to stabilize the spine from the worsening bone destruction.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome</h3><p>The patient recovered well postoperatively, with the resolution of her neurological symptoms and improved mobility.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Full endoscopic spinal debridement and decompression is a powerful tool to manage severe spinal discitis and preliminary studies encourage its adoption in surgical practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424002233/pdfft?md5=dae24cc6ac52b73f20a7e8e7c07df46c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424002233-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141849123","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Quantifying value loss due to presenteeism and absenteeism in workers’ compensation spinal patients","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100527","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100527","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Recent studies suggest that better outcomes in work productivity following spine surgery eventually offset the higher cost of treatment. By analyzing preoperative and postoperative changes in work productivity, studies can determine if surgery is cost-effective and give patients valuable information about treatment. Prior studies reviewing outcomes in work performance after spine surgery have largely excluded patients on workers’ compensation from the overall cost analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review of 92 eligible patients was conducted. Evaluation of the EHR identified presenteeism and absenteeism from designated work restrictions. Statistical analyses were conducted using JMP Pro 17.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>About 84 (83%) spinal surgery cases were able to return to work, 60 (59%) were able to return to work with no restrictions, 26 (26%) received permanent work restrictions, and 12 (12%) were still undergoing treatment. 86 (85%) experienced presenteeism and 99 (98%) experienced absenteeism. Of the cases that were able to return to work without permanent work restrictions, the mean presenteeism length postoperatively was 287.4 days (median 191 days) and the mean absenteeism length postoperatively was 232.5 days (median 142 days). 72 patients were identified as having sedentary or nonsedentary labor. After excluding outliers, the average return-to-work length was 988.62 days for patients with sedentary employment types and 952.15 days for patients with nonsedentary employment types (p=.116).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Following spinal surgery, our worker's compensation patient population's return-to-work rate was at an average of 232.5 days (median of 142 days) for 83% of patients included in this study. This exhibited worse outcomes than a previous study's measurement excluding worker's compensation patients. Presenteeism length within our population contributed more to decreased work productivity postoperatively than absenteeism length. Our results found no significant difference in return-to-work length between patients with sedentary and nonsedentary employment types.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424002208/pdfft?md5=fe6ec496494e22c0f12e44d6718159c0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424002208-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141841631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Relationship between spinal alignment and functional disability after thoracolumbar spinal fractures: A systematic review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100529","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100529","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Thoracolumbar spinal fractures (TLSF) can cause pain, neurological deficits, and functional disability. Operative treatments aim to preserve neurological function, improve functional status, and restore spinal alignment and stability. In this review, we evaluate the relationship between spinal alignment and functional impairment in patients with TLSF.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We performed a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to identify full-text articles that evaluate the correlation between spinal alignment and functional outcomes of TLSF. The artificial intelligence software Rayyan assisted the screening process. Functional outcomes referred to activity/disability, quality of life, and pain scores, as well as return to work metrics. Radiological assessments included were vertebral compression angle, Cobb and Gardner angles, sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt. Statistical analyses were performed for the data provided by articles using the SPSS v24.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 1,616 articles reviewed, 6 were included for final analysis. Only 1 study primarily addressed the effects of spinopelvic parameters and functional outcomes. Four studies correlated Cobb angles with functional outcome, while 3 others compared vertebral compression angles with functional outcomes. Outcomes were assessed using work status or a combination of VAS pain and spine score, ODI, SF-36, and RMDQ-24. Neither the analysis done within the articles, nor the one made with the raw data provided by them, showed a significant correlation between the radiological measurements assessed at time of injury and final functional outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A correlation between the assessed spinal radiological measurements assessed with the functional outcomes of TLSF was not found in this review. Further well-designed prospective studies are necessary to evaluate spinal alignment measurements in TLSF with functional outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424002221/pdfft?md5=00bdec5d92ddfb6dcc1afeedb2a8e1a0&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424002221-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141850535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Twelve-month results from a randomized controlled trial comparing differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation and conventional spinal cord stimulation in subjects with chronic refractory axial low back pain not eligible for spine surgery","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100528","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100528","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Successful treatments for intractable chronic low back pain (CLBP) in patients who are not eligible for surgical interventions are scarce. The superior efficacy of differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation (DTM SCS) to conventional SCS (Conv-SCS) on the treatment of CLBP in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS) who have failed surgical interventions (PSPS-T2) motivated the evaluation of DTM SCS versus Conv-SCS on PSPS patients who are non-surgical candidates (PSPS-T1).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a prospective, open label, crossover, post-market randomized controlled trial in 20 centers across the United States. Eligible patients were randomized to either DTM SCS or Conv-SCS in a 1:1 ratio. Primary endpoint was CLBP responder rate (percentage of subjects with ≥50% CLBP relief) at 3-month in randomized subjects who completed trialing (modified intention-to-treat population). Patients were followed up to 12 months. Secondary endpoints included change of CLBP and leg pain, responder rates, changes in disability, quality of life, patient satisfaction and global impression of change, and safety profile. An optional crossover was available at 6-month to all patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>About 121 PSPS-T1 subjects with CLBP and leg pain mostly associated with degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy and who were not eligible for spine surgery were randomized. CLBP responder rate with DTM SCS (93.5%) was superior to Conv-SCS (36.4%) at the primary endpoint. Superior CLBP responder rates (88.1%–90.5%) were obtained with DTM SCS at all other timepoints. Mean CLBP reduction with DTM SCS (6.52 cm) was superior to that with Conv-SCS (3.01 cm) at the primary endpoint. Similar CLBP reductions (6.23–6.43 cm) were obtained with DTM SCS at other timepoints. DTM SCS provided significantly better leg pain reduction and responder rate, improvement of disability and quality of life, and better patient satisfaction and global impression of change. 90.9% of Conv-SCS subjects who crossed over were CLBP responders at completion of the study. Similar safety profiles were observed between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>DTM SCS for chronic CLBP in nonsurgical candidates is superior to Conv-SCS. Improvements were sustained and provided significant benefits on the management of these patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266654842400221X/pdfft?md5=b02cb9ba1a77bf63ac377cbbfa76dcf2&pid=1-s2.0-S266654842400221X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141850408","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Prediction models for risk assessment of surgical site infection after spinal surgery: A systematic review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100518","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100518","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Spinal surgeries are a common procedure, but there is significant risk of adverse events following these operations. While the rate of adverse events ranges from 8% to 18%, surgical site infections (SSIs) alone occur in between 1% and 4% of spinal surgeries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We completed a systematic review addressing factors that contribute to surgical site infection after spinal surgery. From the included studies, we separated the articles into groups based on whether they propose a clinical predictive tool or model. We then compared the prediction variables, model development, model validation, and model performance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>About 47 articles were included in this study: 10 proposed a model and 5 validated a model. The models were developed from 7,720 participants in total and 210 participants with SSI. Only one of the proposed models was externally validated by an independent group. The other 4 validation papers examined the performance of the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While some preoperative risk models have been validated, and even successfully implemented clinically, the significance of postoperative SSIs and the unique susceptibility of spine surgery patients merits the development of a spine-specific preoperative risk model. Additionally, comprehensive and stratified risk modeling for SSI would be of invaluable clinical utility and greatly improve the field of spine surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424002117/pdfft?md5=cc17f09a231ddf220b4943c41a9c673e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424002117-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141711930","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Circumferential correction of spinal deformity and instability secondary to bacterial spondylodiscitis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100517","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100517","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Spinal deformity as a sequela of nontuberculous spondylodiscitis is a rarely discussed clinical entity. Sagittal plane deformity, segmental instability, and persistently active infection overlap in these patients resulting in severe restriction in activity and quality of life. The presence of multiple medical co-morbidities restricts surgical options but nonoperative care may be ineffective and result in persistent, refractory discitis for years. We describe our experience with vertebrectomy and long-segment fixation for patients with postinfectious thoracic or lumbar deformity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective chart review of 23 consecutive patients who underwent vertebrectomy and long-segment fixation for thoracic or lumbar deformity secondary to nontuberculous bacterial spondylodiscitis was performed. Pre, peri- and postoperative data is compiled and analyzed with a focus on the perioperative management algorithm to safely perform an extensive reconstruction in this very sick patient population.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Extremely low preoperative quality of life was evident with 87% (20/23) of patients bedridden primarily due to pain despite 70% (16/23) of patients being strong enough to ambulate (Frankel D or E). Most patients (87%) already had an identified infection under adequate treatment either through blood cultures, prior biopsy or decompressive surgery. A single-stage posterior-only was the primary surgical approach utilized in the majority (83%) of cases. Complications were present in 100% of patients, most commonly perioperative anemia and hypotension requiring vasopressor support and aggressive blood product replacement. One in-hospital mortality occurred secondarily to pulmonary embolism. Mean preoperative segmental angle was 18±10 degrees of kyphosis which was corrected to 1±9 degrees of lordosis (p=.001). The mean correction of the segmental angle was 19 degrees (standard deviation 23 degrees). Visual analogue scale scores improved from a preoperative value of 8.8±0.9 to a postoperative value of 2.5±1.4 (p&lt;.001), which was obtained at the last outpatient follow-up (mean 631 days after surgery). Full self-care including ambulation was achieved in 18/23 (78%) patients, and the infection was successfully treated in 22/23 (96%) patients after long-term antibiotics.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients with refractory spondylodiscitis on appropriate care and antibiotics are typically considered extremely poor surgical candidates despite nonoperative care often being ineffective. Postinfectious deformity may also be so severe as to preclude a limited surgical treatment strategy. This study suggests that extensive circumferential reconstruction for deformity secondary to bacterial spondylodiscitis can be effective in restoring these extremely sick patients to self-care and ambulatory status.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424002105/pdfft?md5=2dd0196f5ba6de0e54c5f906e02b019a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424002105-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141714179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sagittal spinal alignment measurements and evaluation: Historical perspective","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100519","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100519","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Spinal alignment analysis play an important role in evaluating patients and planning surgical corrections for adult spinal deformity. The history of these parameters is relatively short with the first parameter, the Cobb angle, introduced in 1948 as part of an effort to improve scoliosis evaluation. New developments in the field were limited for nearly 30 years before better imaging technology encouraged new theories and later data about spinal alignment and the relationship between the spine and pelvis. These efforts would ultimately contribute to the creation of foundational spinal alignment parameters, including pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope. By the 1990s, spinal alignment had become a sustained area of investigation for spinal surgeons and researchers. Novel alignment parameters have since been introduced as our knowledge has evolved and has allowed for valuable research that demonstrates the clinical and surgical value of alignment measurement. This manuscript will explore the history of spinal alignment analysis over the decades.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34622,"journal":{"name":"North American Spine Society Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548424002129/pdfft?md5=899717a59a2349c53a4d1c1e9b7374a9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666548424002129-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141841463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}