{"title":"Validation of Indonesian Version of Offence-Related Feelings of Guilt and Shame: A Rasch Model Analysis","authors":"S. Salma, D. Kaloeti, Y. F. La Kahija","doi":"10.15408/jp3i.v11i1.19923","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v11i1.19923","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to conduct an adaptation and validation of the Offence-Related Feelings of Shame and Guilt Scale (ORSGS) in the Indonesian language. ORGS was translated into the Indonesian language using a forward translation method by a bilingual psychology expert. Five hundred ten male prisoners from three correctional institutions in Indonesia were recruited and completed the Indonesian version of ORSGS in paper-and-pencil. A Rasch model approach was applied to evaluate the psychometric properties and validity of the adapted scale. The results showed that the Indonesian version of ORSGS had moderate Cronbach’s Alpha reliability (α= .65) and excellent item reliability (.99). Item logit ranged from -1.08 to .72 with a separation value of 8.79, showing that items were grouped into 12 groups. The unidimensionality was found as acceptable/ moderate by 30.4% total variance explained from Principal Component Analysis but still needs further confirmatory analysis. Item 1 and 2 were found to be misfit and need to be evaluated. According to the Rasch model result, it can be concluded that the Indonesian version of ORSGS was valid (10 out of 12 items were fit) and reliable (Item reliability: .99) to be used in the prisoner population. However, further investigation about its multidimensionality and criterion validity still needs to be conducted","PeriodicalId":34093,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81856141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Indonesian Adaptation and Validation of The Child-Adolescent Perfectionism Scale – Short Form (CAPS-SF)","authors":"Sonia Marcellina, F. Lubis","doi":"10.15408/jp3i.v11i1.24272","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v11i1.24272","url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to adapt and examine the psychometric properties of The Child-Adolescent Perfectionism Scale – Short Form (CAPS – SF) in an Indonesian sample. In Indonesia, research on perfectionism is being developed, but there is no measurement for adolescent perfectionism that can be used. Therefore, a valid and reliable measurement is needed. The Child-Adolescent Perfectionism Scale – Short Form (CAPS – SF) developed by Bento et al. is an instrument consisting of 2 dimensions of Socially Prescribed Perfectionism and Self-Oriented Perfectionism with a total of 9 items that can measure perfectionism in children and adolescents. The adaptation process followed the guidelines established by the International Test Commission such as translation, cognitive interview, and test of the pre-final Indonesian version which involved 322 adolescents aged 13-15 years who lived in Indonesia. Reliability test using Cronbach's Alpha and CFA, which was used to measure the construct validity, showed that the nine items in adapted The Child-Adolescent Perfectionism Scale – Short Form (CAPS – SF) could be used to measure the perfectionism of Indonesian adolescents.","PeriodicalId":34093,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89283698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Effect of Problem-Based Learning Model on Mathematical Critical Thinking Skills of Junior High School Students: A Meta-Analysis Study","authors":"Yohannes Yohannes, D. Juandi, M. Tamur","doi":"10.15408/jp3i.v10i2.17893","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v10i2.17893","url":null,"abstract":"Numerous similar studies have been conducted to evaluate the effect of problem-based learning models (PBL) on students' mathematical critical thinking skills. However, the findings from these studies are inconsistent. Highlighting this gap, this study comprehensively evaluates the effectiveness of implementing the PBL model on junior high school students’ critical thinking skills. This meta-analysis study was conducted by analyzing a sample of 15 journal papers that met the feasibility. Empirical data collection uses several journal search engines, and the instruments used are coding categories. Data analysis to obtain effect size value was performed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software, and the estimation method used a random-effect model. Overall, the results showed that the effect size of PBL model implementation on mathematical critical thinking skills of junior high school students is 0.970, which means the PBL model's implementation had a high effect on students' critical thinking skills. Besides, the effect size of implementing the PBL model on junior high school students' critical thinking skills did not differ based on differences in class, year of study, and sample size. However, there were significant differences in effect sizes between study groups based on treatment duration. Thus, PBL will achieve a higher level of effectiveness, taking into account the treatment duration.","PeriodicalId":34093,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42946103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale Form L-M Predictive Power on Academic Achievement","authors":"Eugenius Tintus Reinaldi, Rahmat Hidayat","doi":"10.15408/jp3i.v10i2.20009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v10i2.20009","url":null,"abstract":"Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale Form L-M test is widely used in Indonesia to assess the academic capacity of elementary school students. However, its predictive power upon academic achievements has not been examined. This research represents a preliminary attempt at closing this gap. Stanford-Binet scores obtained 1 to 3 years earlier were used to explain variations in three subject marks of 156 an Elementary School from the 3rd, 4th, and 5th Grades. Simple regression analysis shows that 4.3% to 25.4% of the variance can be explained by Stanford-Binet scores, indicating a low to moderate predictive power. The results suggest a limited predictive power of the Stanford-Binet Form L-M test for applications in the assessment of the academic capacity of elementary school children.","PeriodicalId":34093,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48949473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Uly Gusniarti, Mira Aliza Rachmawati, Susilo Wibisono, Libbie Annatagia, Ike Agustina, Rumiani Rumiani
{"title":"Norming of Coloured Progressive Matrices Test in Elementary School Children Based on Classical Measurement Theory and Rasch Modeling","authors":"Uly Gusniarti, Mira Aliza Rachmawati, Susilo Wibisono, Libbie Annatagia, Ike Agustina, Rumiani Rumiani","doi":"10.15408/jp3i.v10i2.18155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v10i2.18155","url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to develop Coloured Progressive Matrices (CPM) norms for the use in the Indonesian context. We used two approaches, namely classical test theory (CTT) which uses raw score (total score) as measurement result information and Rasch modeling which uses logit value as measurement result information. This research was conducted in four regencies and one municipality in the Province of Yogyakarta. The participants were 1,779 elementary school age children recruited through random sampling. The norming analysis in this study divided the data into five age groups in the range of 6 – 12.5 years old. The level of intelligence represented by the results of the CPM measurement consists of five levels, from Grade I to Grade V. Grade V as the lowest intelligence level has a value below the 5th Percentile of the data distribution. Grade IV as the second lowest level of intelligence was located between between the 5th and 25th Percentile of the data distribution. Grade III representing the average level of intelligence had the greatest range from 25th to 75th Percentile. In addition, the range allocated for Grade II was similar to Grade IV, but in the opposite direction of the distribution (i.e., between 75th and 95th Percentile). Lastly, Grade I as a representation of the highest level of intelligence is in the range of values above the 95th Percentile.","PeriodicalId":34093,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48303327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Adaptation and Assessment of Psychometric Properties of the Brief Sensation-seeking Scale in an Indonesian General Sample","authors":"Sunu Bagaskara","doi":"10.15408/jp3i.v10i2.21618","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v10i2.21618","url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the Brief Sensation-seeking Scale (BSSS, Hoyle et al., 2002) in an Indonesian sample. A set of questionnaires consisting of an adaptation of the BSSS, Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI)-Indonesia, and a risky driving behavior scale were administered to 360 participants with an average age of 25.23 years. The reliability test using the internal consistency method showed high reliability (α=0.79). CFA analysis shows that the factor structure of the 4-factor BSSS-Indonesia model is more fit to the data than the 1-factor model. Construct validity was also found from the results of the correlation analysis of the BSSS-I score with the personality traits of openness to experience (convergent), agreeableness, and conscientiousness (discriminant). Regarding demographics, it was found that there were differences in the average scores between both sexes and age groups. The BSSS-I score was also found to be a significant predictor of risky driving behavior (concurrent validity). Taken together, the findings of this study show satisfactory evidence of psychometric properties, in line with previous adaptation of BSSS in several other cultures. This indicates that the BSSS-I is a sound instrument to measure trait sensation-seeking in the Indonesian population.","PeriodicalId":34093,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49520125","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kusumasari Kartika Hima Darmayanti, E. Anggraini, Efan Yudha Winata, M. Mardianto
{"title":"Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Academic Self-Efficacy Scale: An Indonesian Version","authors":"Kusumasari Kartika Hima Darmayanti, E. Anggraini, Efan Yudha Winata, M. Mardianto","doi":"10.15408/jp3i.v10i2.19777","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v10i2.19777","url":null,"abstract":"Several studies regarding academic self-efficacy are developed in which a valid and reliable measurement is needed. One of the well-known instruments used to measure college students' academic self-efficacy is The Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (TASES). It was designed by Sagone and Caroli (2014), comprising four dimensions, i.e., self-engagement, self-oriented decision-making, others-oriented problem-solving, and interpersonal climate. This instrument contained 30 items at first, but two items were removed after testing the factor analysis, and 28 items remained. This study examined the validity of the adaptation of TASES into the Indonesian version. This scale was adapted into the Indonesian version using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), involving 166 Indonesian college students studying at universities in Indonesia and abroad. The CFA results showed that the items which were distributed in 4 dimensions in this scale are found to fit except three items of interpersonal climate dimension. Therefore those three items have been eliminated. In addition, the coefficient of Cronbach's Alpha of TASES Indonesian version is highly reliable. Ultimately, the TASES Indonesian version consisting of 25-item within four dimensions has shown to be a reliable and valid measurement for academic self-efficacy in the Indonesian context.","PeriodicalId":34093,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43435032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
L. Wahyuni, Rezza Citraini, Bijak Aditia Hutomo, G. Gumelar
{"title":"Anxiety and Test Form: The Differences of Test Anxiety Levels in Terms of Test Form","authors":"L. Wahyuni, Rezza Citraini, Bijak Aditia Hutomo, G. Gumelar","doi":"10.15408/jp3i.v10i2.17974","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v10i2.17974","url":null,"abstract":"Education is one of the most important aspects of human life. In the education file, examination is an important part to evaluate the progress of the students. The students need to fulfill the test parameters and indicators in order to move to the higher level of class or higher degree. The common feeling while students feel anxious in facing the test is called test anxiety. There are several factors that affect test anxiety, and one of the most common sources is the test form. This study aimed to determine the differences in test anxiety levels in students in terms of multiple-choice and matchmaking tests. The population of this study was 142 students of the Faculty of Psychology Education that registered in 2018. The design of this study was a quasi-experimental research with two-group pretest-posttest design. The instrument used in this study was the Reaction to Test scale by Irwin G. Sarason. The results showed that the multiple-choice test anxiety level was higher than the matching test, although the difference was small. The multiple-choice test anxiety level was (M = 2.17) and matchmaking (M = 2.07).","PeriodicalId":34093,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43248911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Bayesian Statistics in Psychological Research","authors":"Edwin Adrianta Surijah, I. M. F. Anggara","doi":"10.15408/jp3i.v10i2.20185","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v10i2.20185","url":null,"abstract":"One of the key developments in psychological data analysis is the Bayesian implementation. This article aims to introduce Bayesian statistics application in psychological research. A data set of Marital Satisfaction and Positive Affect (n = 200) became an example to compare the regression results based on frequentist and Bayesian statistics. The data analysis examined the influence of positive affect on marital satisfaction. Based upon the prior information and observed data, results suggest that the average of the distribution of the posterior coefficient of positive affect is .31, with a deviation standard of .01 and a credible interval ranging from .30 to .33. The study’s results present the unique approach in interpreting the Bayesian result. This article also outlines diagnostic steps to obtain a robust Bayesian result and avoid misuse of Bayesian statistics. Finally, discussions cover the probability principle in Bayesian analysis and how to interpret its result to encourage Indonesian psychological scientists to implement Bayesian as an alternative to data analysis.","PeriodicalId":34093,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45486021","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Evaluating Psychometric Properties of the Stress Measurement Instrument (the Operational and Organizational Police Stress Questionnaires) with the Application of Rasch Model in the Indonesian Nasional Police (INP)","authors":"Abi Risa Bayu Argo, Heri Yulianto, D. Nuryanto","doi":"10.15408/jp3i.v10i1.17557","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v10i1.17557","url":null,"abstract":"Police Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) is a questionnaire developed by McCreary and Thompson (2006) to measure stress exercised by the police. The development of this questionnaire is based on the reason that the previous stress measuring instruments only measure general stressors and can’t describe specific stressors, especially in types of work that exert high level of stress. This study aims to evaluate the Police Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) instrument consists of two instruments, namely the Operational Police Stress Questionnaire (PSQ-Op) and the Organizational Police Stress Questionnaire (PSQ-Org), each containing 20 items with seven-point Likert scale for police officers in Indonesia. Respondents in this study were 313 police officers who served in the National Police Headquarters work unit (32.9%), Regional Police (38.3%), Resort Police (19.5%) and Sector Police (9.3%). The data collection technique used non-probability sampling with the help of the google form application. The method used is the Rating Scale Model (RSM). The results show that the Indonesian version of the Police Stressor Questionnaire (PSQ) is proven to meet unidimensional assumptions and the reliability analysis for person and items shows a strong level of reliability. However, the Rasch RSM analysis found violations of the assumption of local independence and problematic discrimination at specific thresholds (threshold disorder) in the seven response categories used. Furthermore, the results of the application of the Rasch Model Rating Scale model show that the psychometric facts of the two research instruments are very good and precise, as well as the suitability of the items to the model. Implications and suggestions for future research are also presented in the discussion.","PeriodicalId":34093,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42643978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}