{"title":"Jushi Group Co., Ltd v OCV Intellectual Capital, LLC","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcz006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcz006","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents – European patents – Glass reinforcement strands – Validity – Novelty – Obviousness – Construction – List of chemical constituents – Numerical ranges – Role of specifically acknowledged prior art – Overlapping ranges – Nature and extent of disclosure – The “serious contemplation” test – Whether clear disclosure of all possible permutations – Appeal to Court of Appeal","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"os-23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127767352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Generics (UK) Ltd (T/A Mylan) v Warner-Lambert Company LLC","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcz005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcz005","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 Patents – Swiss-form claims – Pregabalin – Use in the manufacture or preparation of a medicament for the treating of pain – Construction – Validity – Infringement – Meaning of “for treating” neuropathic pain – Whether central neuropathic pain included – Insufficiency – Biogen insufficiency – Plausibility – Whether plausibility required across full width of claim – Nature of the plausibility requirement – Direct infringement under s.60(1)(b) – Whether intention a necessary element – Nature of the infringement test in relation to claims in Swiss form – Manufacturer liability – “Downstream” liability – Whether subjective intention required – Reasonable foreseeability – The role of packaging – Indirect infringement – Amendment – Post-trial validating amendments – Abuse of process – Discretion – Appeal to Supreme Court","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117329826","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"UNWIRED PLANET INTERNATIONAL LTD v HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcy051","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcy051","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133950649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"WALTON INTERNATIONAL LTD v VERWEIJ FASHION BV","authors":"Chancery Division","doi":"10.1093/RPC/RCY050","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RPC/RCY050","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130103464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"CONVERSANT WIRELESS LICENSING S.A.R.L. v HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO LTD","authors":"Patents Court","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcy045","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcy045","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 H1 Patents – European patents – Telecommunications – Standards essential patents – Infringement – Claims for global FRAND licences – Jurisdiction – Justiciability – Whether validity of foreign patents in issue – Stay of proceedings – Forum non conveniens – Whether China the natural and appropriate forum – Service of proceedings – Whether defendants validly served within the jurisdiction – Service out of the jurisdiction – Jurisdictional gateways – Whether good arguable case for a FRAND injunction – Property within the jurisdiction – Serious issue to be tried – Appeal to Court of Appeal","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129700022","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"BREWSTER’S TRADE MARK APPLICATION","authors":"Appointed Person","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcy049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcy049","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115445281","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC v KYMAB LTD","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcy039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcy039","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"9 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133124867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC v KYMAB LTD (No. 2)","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/rpc/rcy044","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpc/rcy044","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128894096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"ILLUMINA, INC v PREMAITHA HEALTH PLC","authors":"Patents Court","doi":"10.1093/RPC/RCY038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RPC/RCY038","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114415997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"SKY PLC v SKYKICK UK LTD (No. 2)","authors":"Chancery Division","doi":"10.1093/RPC/RCY032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/RPC/RCY032","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":336842,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125794168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}