Democratic Biopolitics最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
How to enjoy democracy again (and again) 如何一次次地享受民主
Democratic Biopolitics Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0007
S. Prozorov
{"title":"How to enjoy democracy again (and again)","authors":"S. Prozorov","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0007","url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 6 argues that the oscillation between captivation and boredom in the distracted dwelling in forms of life is not merely a possible but also an enjoyable and pleasant experience. Drawing on Jean-Luc Nancy’s account of pleasure as the experience of one’s formative force in every act of formation, Prozorov argues that the biopolitical conversion of democracy that affirms the experimental, freeform life renders democracy more viable by adding to its normative legitimacy an affective dimension of enjoyment. Democracy is not merely ‘right’ from any given normative perspective but also feels good, since it ensures the possibility of freely forming and transforming our lives without being held captive in any privileged form. Thus, democracy is not merely sustainable in a biopolitical mode but is in fact reinvigorated by its translation into concrete forms of life.","PeriodicalId":332955,"journal":{"name":"Democratic Biopolitics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125900693","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is there a democratic form of life? 有民主的生活形式吗?
Democratic Biopolitics Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0005
S. Prozorov
{"title":"Is there a democratic form of life?","authors":"S. Prozorov","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0005","url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 4 addresses the question of whether the democratic principles of freedom, equality and community constitute a form of life of their own or rather function as the framework for the coexistence of diverse forms of life. While the first possibility is best illustrated by Alain Badiou’s politics of truth, which takes up and radicalizes the Rousseauan tradition, the latter option has been developed in Jean-Luc Nancy’s theory of democracy. Prozorov critically engages with both positions while ultimately opting for the third, inspired by Agamben’s notion of destituent power. Rather than single out any particular form of life as democratic, he argues that democracy may be affirmed from within any particular form of life, but only as long as this form is practiced in the manner that manifests its contingency.","PeriodicalId":332955,"journal":{"name":"Democratic Biopolitics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117037695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The community of solitary walkers 独行者的社区
Democratic Biopolitics Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0003
S. Prozorov
{"title":"The community of solitary walkers","authors":"S. Prozorov","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0003","url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 2 addresses a recent reinterpretation of Rousseau by Peter Sloterdijk, which prioritizes his late work The Reveries of the Solitary Walker as politically more important than the theory of sovereignty in The Social Contract. In contrast to Sloterdijk Prozorov reads these two works as by no means opposed but affirming the same thing, the sheer existence of the subject, individual or collective, subtracted from all particular predicates. It is this mode of subtractive subjectivity that Rousseau wishes to oppose to partial interests in society that perpetually threaten to corrupt the general will. Prozorov then shows how the contemporary critique of biopolitics relies on the same logic of subtraction, which necessarily leads it into the same aporia as it did Rousseau: if democracy is only conceivable through the subtraction from all particularism, it ends up unsustainable and indefensible in the face of this very particularism.","PeriodicalId":332955,"journal":{"name":"Democratic Biopolitics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115028875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Demos distracted 演示分心
Democratic Biopolitics Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0006
S. Prozorov
{"title":"Demos distracted","authors":"S. Prozorov","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"In Chapter 5 Prozorov argues that the ontological contingency that defines democracy is accessible in our lived experience in states of distraction, characterized by the alternation between captivation and boredom. This alternation makes it possible for us to dwell within plural forms of life in a non-definitive manner, retaining our potentiality for being otherwise. He develops this argument by critically re-engaging with Heidegger’s discussion of curiosity and distraction in Being and Time. Prozorov argues that democracy is existentially experienced in the potentiality for perpetual alternation between captivation and boredom in whatever form of life we dwell in, which constitutes our lives as freeform, always manifesting the possibility of being otherwise than they are. In this manner he grounds the possibility of democratic biopolitics in the aspect of the human condition familiar and available to all, thus demonstrating its realizability.","PeriodicalId":332955,"journal":{"name":"Democratic Biopolitics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127183774","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Why democracy is good for life 为什么民主对生活有益
Democratic Biopolitics Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0008
S. Prozorov
{"title":"Why democracy is good for life","authors":"S. Prozorov","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0008","url":null,"abstract":"The epilogue addresses the implications of the notion of democratic biopolitics, developed in the book, for addressing the currently perceived crisis of liberal democracy worldwide due to the rise of authoritarian and xenophobic populism.","PeriodicalId":332955,"journal":{"name":"Democratic Biopolitics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127991180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rousseau’s aporia
Democratic Biopolitics Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0002
S. Prozorov
{"title":"Rousseau’s aporia","authors":"S. Prozorov","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0002","url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 1 revisits Rousseau’s account of the inherently problematic relation between sovereignty and government and addresses the interpretations of this account in contemporary critiques of biopolitics in the work of Badiou, Agamben and Esposito. Prozorov demonstrates that the dualism established by Rousseau between universalist popular sovereignty and particularist acts of government remains at work in contemporary critical literature on biopolitics. As an inherently particularistic mode of government, biopolitics is held to be necessarily opposed to popular sovereignty expressed in general will and can therefore only contaminate or pervert democracy.","PeriodicalId":332955,"journal":{"name":"Democratic Biopolitics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125541740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Biopower and the politics of contingency 生物能源与偶然性政治
Democratic Biopolitics Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0004
S. Prozorov
{"title":"Biopower and the politics of contingency","authors":"S. Prozorov","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0004","url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 3 offers a biopolitical translation of Claude Lefort’s idea of the democratic regime as characterized by ontological contingency and epistemic indeterminacy. Lefort’s powerful image of the void at the heart of democracy is in the context of biopolitics specified in terms of the absence of any proper form of life and the affirmation of radical pluralism of contingent ways of living. This contingency is, moreover, not itself contingent but is a necessary consequence of the disarticulation of truth, power and ethics in the democratic regime. From this necessary contingency Prozorov infers the principles of freedom, equality and community that are universal conditions of legitimacy for all forms of life in a democracy.","PeriodicalId":332955,"journal":{"name":"Democratic Biopolitics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124988736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Towards an experimental analytics of government 走向实验性的政府分析
Democratic Biopolitics Pub Date : 2019-03-01 DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0001
S. Prozorov
{"title":"Towards an experimental analytics of government","authors":"S. Prozorov","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474449342.003.0001","url":null,"abstract":"The Introduction discusses the way the question of democracy has been addressed in the canonical theories of biopolitics, presents the method of the inquiry and briefly outlines the structure of the argument.","PeriodicalId":332955,"journal":{"name":"Democratic Biopolitics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115532618","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信