{"title":"The Significance of the Common Understanding in Legal Theory","authors":"N. Barber","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1995809","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1995809","url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on an aspect of the methodology of legal scholarship: the role that the common understanding of an institution or principle should play in formulating a successful account of that entity. The paper begins by surveying the claims for the common understanding in contemporary scholarship. There are at least three reasons why a theorist should pay regard to the common understanding. First, the account produced needs to be intelligible to the community it addresses. Second, as social institutions are constituted by social rules, and shaped by people’s beliefs and dispositions, the common understanding of social institutions will at least partly determine their nature and operation. Finally, the common understanding may provide a pointer towards important features of the institution or principle: an argument based on the ‘wisdom of crowds’ may require us to pay attention to what people think is significant and valuable, even if we struggle to see this ourselves. The paper then considers the limitations of these arguments. Though they all show a role for the common understanding in accounts of institutions and principles, none are decisive: there is latitude for theorists to depart from the common understanding and, indeed, to produce successful interpretations of these phenomena such departure is often essential.","PeriodicalId":326416,"journal":{"name":"The Methodology of Constitutional Theory","volume":"603 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133466319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Slaying the Misshapen Monster: The Case for Constitutional Heuristics","authors":"T. Arvind, Lindsay Stirton","doi":"10.5040/9781509933877.ch-004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509933877.ch-004","url":null,"abstract":"On 9 February 1784 Adriaan Kluit, rector magnificus at the University of Leiden, ascended the podium to deliver his valedictory address: ‘On the abuse of constitutional law’.1 Kluit was speaking at a time of fierce contestation in Dutch politics between the Orangists (with whom Kluit identified) and the anti-Orangist ‘Patriots’. The language of constitutional theory had become a key weapon in their battle, and it was to that language that Kluit’s address was directed. Its contents were sharp and uncompromising. The Patriots, Kluit said, had created ‘a misshapen monster in constitutional law.’2 The excellent provisions of the Dutch state’s settled constitutional institutions had established civil liberty on the firmest foundations, but these accomplishments were threatened by those who, posing as the commonwealth’s physicians, were taking it down a path of ruin.3 The Patriots’ constitutional doctrines, Kluit warned, were a destructive plague bringing catastrophes upon commonwealths.4 This chapter is motivated by our sense that little has changed since Kluit’s day in the methodology of constitutional theory and how it deals with disagreement. The debate between Kluit and the Patriots was at one level a theoretical debate as to the meaning of liberty, and whether civil liberty mattered more than political liberty. Yet the argument about these concepts was suffused with claims about facts: about the Netherlands’ Batavian","PeriodicalId":326416,"journal":{"name":"The Methodology of Constitutional Theory","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116126404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The View from Nowhere in Constitutional Theory: A Methodological Inquiry","authors":"S. Şuteu","doi":"10.5040/9781509933877.ch-013","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509933877.ch-013","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":326416,"journal":{"name":"The Methodology of Constitutional Theory","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114510072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Constitutional Law as Legitimacy-Enhancer","authors":"D. Kyritsis","doi":"10.5040/9781509933877.ch-008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509933877.ch-008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":326416,"journal":{"name":"The Methodology of Constitutional Theory","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133514374","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A Positivist and Political Approach to Public Law","authors":"M. Gordon","doi":"10.5040/9781509933877.ch-009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509933877.ch-009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":326416,"journal":{"name":"The Methodology of Constitutional Theory","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127507870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Methodology of Constitutional Theory – Introduction","authors":"D. Kyritsis, Stuart Lakin","doi":"10.5040/9781509933877.0008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509933877.0008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":326416,"journal":{"name":"The Methodology of Constitutional Theory","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128989120","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The British Constitution as an Improvised Order","authors":"D. Howarth","doi":"10.5040/9781509933877.ch-011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509933877.ch-011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":326416,"journal":{"name":"The Methodology of Constitutional Theory","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122225602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Methodology in Constitutional Theory: The Case of the Administrative State","authors":"Kristen Rundle","doi":"10.5040/9781509933877.ch-015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509933877.ch-015","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":326416,"journal":{"name":"The Methodology of Constitutional Theory","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123188941","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}