Global Jurnal Politik Internasional最新文献_第2页

The Papua Conflict: The Different Perspectives of The Indonesian Government and International Communities—Review from The English School Theory 巴布亚冲突:印尼政府与国际社会的不同视角——来自英国学派理论的回顾

Global Jurnal Politik Internasional Pub Date : 2022-11-30 DOI: 10.7454/global.v24i2.1253

引用次数: 2

SOLIDARITY FOR MYANMAR: #MILKTEAALLIANCE INDONESIA’S TRANSNATIONAL ACTIVISM IN PRESSURING THE GOVERNMENT OF INDONESIA AND ASEAN 声援缅甸：#奶茶联盟印尼向印尼政府和东盟施压的跨国行动主义

Global Jurnal Politik Internasional Pub Date : 2022-11-30 DOI: 10.7454/global.v24i2.1257

引用次数: 0

The Establishment of ASEAN Framework of Action on Marine Debris: The Role of Shared Knowledge 建立东盟海洋垃圾行动框架:共享知识的作用

Global Jurnal Politik Internasional Pub Date : 2022-07-30 DOI: 10.7454/global.v24i1.668

Rizky Anggia Putri

{"title":"The Establishment of ASEAN Framework of Action on Marine Debris: The Role of Shared Knowledge","authors":"Rizky Anggia Putri","doi":"10.7454/global.v24i1.668","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v24i1.668","url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1970s, marine debris pollution has been considered a global environmental problem because of the serious threat it poses. Based on 2010 data, the amount of marine debris pollution from the four ASEAN countries plus China has exceeded a quarter of the total global pollution. In 2015, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in particular the 14th goal regarding life under water, were implemented to address this issue in the global realm. But regionally, ASEAN as the biggest pollutant has just formed the ASEAN Framework of Action on Marine Debris in 2019. The time lag is large considering the urgency to respond has emerged since 2010. Even since 2011, ASEAN countries have started research and individual handling efforts. Therefore, knowledge about this issue has emerged since the early 2010s. However, this knowledge does not necessarily get the attention of ASEAN to deal with it collectively. We see that there is an unexplained link between the emergence of urgency and knowledge regarding marine debris pollution in the early 2010s and the formation of the regime in 2019. In this paper, we attempt to analyze how this urgency and knowledge ultimately gained the attention of ASEAN and ultimately formed the regime. The analysis will be carried out using the Weak Cognitivism approach in Knowledge-based theory, focusing on the role of the epistemic community in creating shared knowledge as the key to the formation of an international regime.","PeriodicalId":32472,"journal":{"name":"Global Jurnal Politik Internasional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45117185","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Are Taiwanese Afraid of Terrorism? The Impacts of Hard and Soft Terrorism on Taiwanese 台湾人害怕恐怖主义吗?软硬恐怖主义对台湾人的影响

Global Jurnal Politik Internasional Pub Date : 2022-07-30 DOI: 10.7454/global.v24i1.715

A. Tulga, Ahmet Yiğitalp

引用次数: 1

Developing Indonesian Perspectives in International Relations: The Argument For “Depok School” 发展印尼国际关系观：“德波克学派”之争

Global Jurnal Politik Internasional Pub Date : 2022-07-30 DOI: 10.7454/global.v24i1.1245

Evie Fitriani

引用次数: 0

Bhinneka Tunggal Ika: Indonesia Circumscribed Norm Multiculturalism Bhinneka Tunggal Ika:印尼限制规范多元文化主义

Global Jurnal Politik Internasional Pub Date : 2022-07-30 DOI: 10.7454/global.v24i1.699

Dwi Ardhanariswari Sundrijo

引用次数: 0

China's Strategic Ambiguity on the Issue of Autonomous Weapons Systems 中国在自主武器系统问题上的战略模糊

Global Jurnal Politik Internasional Pub Date : 2022-07-30 DOI: 10.7454/global.v24i1.706

Putu Shangrina Pramudia

{"title":"China's Strategic Ambiguity on the Issue of Autonomous Weapons Systems","authors":"Putu Shangrina Pramudia","doi":"10.7454/global.v24i1.706","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v24i1.706","url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the factors behind China's ambiguous stance on the issue of autonomous weapons and its relationship with China's rise. In 2016 at the United Nations on Certain Conventional Weapons (UN-CCW), China was the only Permanent Five (P5) country to call for the prohibition and importance of a binding protocol on autonomous weapons. Through its position paper, China stated that the characteristics of autonomous weapons are not in accordance with the principles of International Humanitarian Law (IHL), fears of an arms race, to the threat of war. However, in 2017 China issued the New Generation of AI Development Plan (AIDP), which became the basis for China's development of autonomous weapons. This action violates their commitment at the UN-CCW because, through AIDP, China has planned the use, development, and production of autonomous weapons. Using the framework of the technologically innovative imperative and the conception of strategic ambiguity, this paper argues that China's ambiguous stance is a strategic intention resulting from a response to technological lag and systemic barriers that China is currently facing. This paper concludes that China's ambiguous stance is; (1) aimed to maintain the consistency of China's Peaceful Rise; (2) dealing with technologically innovative imperatives dynamic; (3) helping China in achieving China's Dream to achieve a Great Power status.","PeriodicalId":32472,"journal":{"name":"Global Jurnal Politik Internasional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42379828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Beyond Inclusion: Explaining China's Rejection on the Indo-Pacific Regional Construct 超越包容:解读中国对印太地区建设的拒绝

Global Jurnal Politik Internasional Pub Date : 2022-07-30 DOI: 10.7454/global.v24i1.667

A. Jaknanihan

{"title":"Beyond Inclusion: Explaining China's Rejection on the Indo-Pacific Regional Construct","authors":"A. Jaknanihan","doi":"10.7454/global.v24i1.667","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v24i1.667","url":null,"abstract":"The concept of “Indo-Pacific” has been increasingly adopted in foreign policies during the past few years. Despite its multifaceted nature, China has consistently rejected the use of the Indo-Pacific concept in its official policy. Beijing’s attitude was reflected in Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s remarks that dismissed the Indo-Pacific as a “come-back of Cold War mentality” and “retrogression of history.” This study explains why China renounced the Indo-Pacific concept despite the increasing inclusion in defining the region. By employing realist constructivism theory, this paper finds that the prevalence of containment and anti-China narrative engenders Beijing’s threat perception to the concept. The dominant narratives in China’s regional strategy, such as “community of common destiny,” also affect how the country treats the Indo-Pacific as a Western-centric concept, aimed to limit China’s influence. Beyond seeking inclusion from the Indo-Pacific conception, China advances its own vision to the region. China’s vision is projected through the Belt and Road Initiatives and various concepts to shape regional order in Beijing's preference.","PeriodicalId":32472,"journal":{"name":"Global Jurnal Politik Internasional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46642736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Normative Enactment of International Cybersecurity Capacity Building Assistance: A Comparative Analysis on Japanese and South Korean Practices 国际网络安全能力建设援助的规范性制定:日韩实践比较分析

Global Jurnal Politik Internasional Pub Date : 2022-07-30 DOI: 10.7454/global.v24i1.684

Azza Bimantara, Kata Kunci

{"title":"The Normative Enactment of International Cybersecurity Capacity Building Assistance: A Comparative Analysis on Japanese and South Korean Practices","authors":"Azza Bimantara, Kata Kunci","doi":"10.7454/global.v24i1.684","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v24i1.684","url":null,"abstract":"The international community encourages states to embrace the international cooperation to support and assist each other in reducing risks stemming from the digital divide. However, they cannot agree upon how international norms apply to cyberspace, let alone shaping and regulating international cybersecurity capacity building (CCB) assistance. States use international CCB assistance to impose cyber-norms based on their perceptions. It results in different forms of assistance provided by each donor country. Using social constructivism theory and the CCB concept as international assistance, this paper compares the practice of CCB assistance from two donor countries: Japan and South Korea. It emphasises the role of each donor country’s normative structure in shaping their identities, roles, interests, and behaviours in international CCB assistance. Japan’s international cybersecurity cooperation normative structure shapes Japan’s identities and roles that prioritise security-dominant normative and material interests. Meanwhile, South Korea’s developmental focus constructs the country’s identities and roles that shape developmental normative and material interests. This research finds that Japan’s assistance is highly security-oriented while South Korea’s is less security-oriented. Their differences highlight the fragmentation of global cyber-norms caused by different perception processes.","PeriodicalId":32472,"journal":{"name":"Global Jurnal Politik Internasional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44428809","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Cave! Hic Dragones: Understanding Neocolonialism in China’s Economic Diplomacy towards Angola 洞穴!希·龙:中国对安哥拉经济外交中的新殖民主义

Global Jurnal Politik Internasional Pub Date : 2021-12-06 DOI: 10.7454/global.v23i2.645

Ghina Salsabila, I. Kusumawardhana

{"title":"Cave! Hic Dragones: Understanding Neocolonialism in China’s Economic Diplomacy towards Angola","authors":"Ghina Salsabila, I. Kusumawardhana","doi":"10.7454/global.v23i2.645","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v23i2.645","url":null,"abstract":"China is experiencing a fast and dynamic phase of economic development driven by its fast pace of industrialisation. The vast energy demand has pushed China to import energy from other countries with plentiful natural resources. To this aim, China conducts economic diplomacy worldwide, including Angola, a country with plentiful natural resources in Africa. The main concern of this research is China's economic diplomacy which is considered as a form of neocolonialism in this globalisation era. Therefore, the research question of this research is why China's economic diplomacy towards Angola constitutes neocolonialisation. To this aim, this study utilises the Neocolonialism theory in dissecting China's Economic Diplomacy against Angola. This study uses qualitative method with a case study approach using secondary data. Thus, the basis for this research is the author's interpretation. This research concludes that China's economic diplomacy towards Angola constitutes neocolonialisation since the economic means that China exerts on Angola enables China to indirectly control Angola's politics, economy and natural resources, which in turn leads to Angola's dependence on China.","PeriodicalId":32472,"journal":{"name":"Global Jurnal Politik Internasional","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45428251","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0