2019 IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS-ISIE)最新文献

{"title":"R&D Partner Type, Product Life-cycle, and Innovation Performance of High-technology Ventures","authors":"Giwon Kim, Juneseok Hwang","doi":"10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074335","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074335","url":null,"abstract":"To cope with rapidly changing market demand and deficiency of internal resources, innovative ventures actively invite various types of external partners to their innovation process. Although many research has been conducted to identify the effect of R&D partner types on firm performances, few studies have taken into account venture firm as well as the stage of the product life-cycle in examining the issue, which can significantly affect the strategic decision on and the outcome of R&D collaboration. To this end, this study focuses on high-technology ventures at three different stages in product life-cycle and examines the effect of R&D collaboration with five different types of R&D partner on innovation performance of ventures. Our findings reveal that for ventures in the introduction stage, R&D collaboration with large firm is positively related to their innovation performance. In the growth stage of product life-cycle, R&D collaborations with university, public research institute (PRI), and large firm are positively associated with innovation performance. Lastly, for ventures in the mature stage of product life-cycle, university and public research institute are suggested as effective partners for innovation performance of ventures. Neither R&D collaboration with private research centers (PRC) nor other SMEs and ventures show a significant effect on innovation performance at all three stages of product life-cycle. This research contributes to the existing literature of open innovation and innovation management of ventures.","PeriodicalId":321998,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS-ISIE)","volume":"138 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121052969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Organizational Flexibility from the Perspective of the Creation of Cooperation Networks in Family Businesses","authors":"Anna Lemańska-Majdzik, M. Okręglicka","doi":"10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074329","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074329","url":null,"abstract":"The contemporary conditions for the operations of enterprises, including family businesses, require a high level of organizational flexibility in the market decisions taken. This also applies to the creation of cooperation networks since the benefits from adopting the cooperation strategy provides enterprises with competitive advantage in turbulent and demanding markets. The objective of the article is to diagnose the level of flexible operations from the perspective of the creation of cooperation networks between organizations in the market. The conducted analysis is based on the own research results on a group of Polish family businesses. During the analysis, appropriate statistical methods were used, the application of which allowed for indicating the relationships and conditions of the level of flexibility of operations.","PeriodicalId":321998,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS-ISIE)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121903067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability Transition: From Policy Intervention to Stakeholder Coalition","authors":"Michael Zhang","doi":"10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074176","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074176","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I develop and compare two models of innovation. Following literature review a conventional model of technological innovation is constructed which focuses primarily on new product or new process development. In recent years through my research, teaching and editorial experience, I develop an emerging model of innovation ecosystems which offer a broader framework for innovation studies. I use the automotive industry as a case in point and argue that technological innovation to reduce CO2 emissions from the transport sector has been primarily driven by policy interventions as exogenous forces. Innovation ecosystems are a more effective approach to helping us embark on the transition to sustainability. Key to innovation ecosystems are stakeholder coalition, a combination of both exogenous and endogenous forces to innovation ecosystems. Considering the relative efficiency of innovation development by product producers vs. product intermediate users I conclude that product intermediate users augmented innovation ecosystem is more effective and efficient than policy-intervention model.","PeriodicalId":321998,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS-ISIE)","volume":"13 39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133730470","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Knowledge Stock, Competition Orientation and Latecomer Firms’ Attention to Emerging Technologies","authors":"Litian Chen, Ling Wang, Lei Guo","doi":"10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074410","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074410","url":null,"abstract":"Based on the company's attention-based view, this paper takes the Chinese A-share listed companies in the computer and communication industry in 2012-2017 as a sample to explore the impact of the late-stage enterprise knowledge stock and competition-oriented attention on its emerging technologies. The empirical results show that the knowledge stock is negatively related to the company's attention to emerging technologies; enterprises with cost-oriented firms as the rules of action will pay less attention to emerging technologies. This study has important theoretical and practical significance for clarifying the determinants of the emerging technology attention distribution of late-developing enterprises","PeriodicalId":321998,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS-ISIE)","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122278041","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Blockchain-Based Open Network in Technology Intermediation","authors":"Yang Yue, J. Z. Shyu","doi":"10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074272","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074272","url":null,"abstract":"Blockchain technology is developing using in reliable applications which can be designed to achieve decentralization and trustless. Based on the open network innovation theory, this paper proposes a technical intermediary management idea based on blockchain technology to improve the efficiency of technology intermediaries, providing accurate, reliable information and cutting cost for the market. This study demonstrates the advantage of blockchain to technology intermediaries. First, on a specific level, it can provide openness, transparency, decentralization and anonymity services. Second, the current industrial innovation elements are analyzed. blockchain improve the efficiency of technology intermediary, prevent risks and to make up for the shortcomings of traditional intermediaries. It has revolutionized the traditional technology intermediary. As this happens, it can revolutionize traditional technology intermediaries.","PeriodicalId":321998,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS-ISIE)","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121131450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"TEMS-ISIE 2019 Program","authors":"","doi":"10.1109/tems-isie46312.2019.9074182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/tems-isie46312.2019.9074182","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":321998,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS-ISIE)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122604371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Circular Economy: Challenges and Potentials for the Manufacturing Industry by Digital Transformation","authors":"M. Riesener, C. Dölle, Christian Mattern, Julian Kreß","doi":"10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074421","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074421","url":null,"abstract":"The world is steering towards a situation, where resource scarcity will result in cost explosion of material and governments are overstrained to dispose the constantly accumulating amount of waste in their countries. One way to overcome the resulting challenges is the implementation of a circular system, in order to create a closed material cycle and eliminate the production of further waste. The ongoing digital transformation offers the potential to enable a transition towards a circular economy. Therefore, recent studies have been examined, which advocate that digital technologies are key enabling factors to realize the shift from a linear to a circular system. Despite this general agreement, the literature still neglects how digital technologies enable such a circular economy transition for the manufacturing industry. To fill the gap, this paper presents a research framework comprising nine success factors, based on digital transformation technologies. The research framework is composed of two dimensions. The first dimension describes the three phases (manufacturing, usage and reutilization/recycling) of a product lifecycle. The second dimension depicts the design levels of business engineering (strategic-, system- and information level). Therefore, the nine success factors have been described for each level of the framework along the product lifecycle in the context of digital transformation. Thus, the paper gives recommendations to overcome the challenges of manufacturing companies concerning the realization of a circular economy.","PeriodicalId":321998,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS-ISIE)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132572873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Contextual Factors Affecting Decisions About Intellectual Property Licensing Provisions in Collaboration Agreements for Open Innovation Projects of Complex Technological Organizations","authors":"Punyapat Saksupapchon, K. Willoughby","doi":"10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074359","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074359","url":null,"abstract":"Firms collaborate with partners in research and development (R&D) of new technologies for many reasons such as to access complementary knowledge, know-how or skills, to seek new opportunities outside their traditional technology domain, to sustain their continuous flows of innovation, to reduce time to market, or to share risks and costs [1]. The adoption of collaborative research agreements (CRAs) or collaboration agreements (CAs) is rising rapidly as firms attempt to access innovation from various types of organizations to enhance their traditional in-house innovation [2], [3]. To achieve the objectives of their collaborations, firms need to share knowledge and jointly develop new knowledge. As more firms adopt open collaborative innovation strategies, intellectual property (IP) management has inevitably become important because clear and fair contractual IP terms and conditions such as IP ownership allocation, licensing arrangements and compensation for IP access are required for each collaborative project [4], [5]. Moreover, the firms need to adjust their IP management strategies to fit the unique characteristics and circumstances of each particular project [5].This paper addresses one of the challenges of open innovation—the issue of the right to access and exploit innovations owned by collaborative partners inside and outside the boundary of a research collaboration. Licensing is considered as a solution to the problems of managing knowledge shared between collaborators. To design appropriate IP licensing provisions in collaboration agreements with partners in complex research and technology projects, project managers need to configure a set of critical IP licensing elements based on consideration of a strategic set of contextual factors. Drawing inspiration especially from context-related studies that have recently become more prominent in the field of innovation management [5], [6], we adopt a contextual approach to analyze the influence of a variety of factors on decisions related to IP access and licensing solutions.Our literature review covers the topics of: (1) open innovation and collaborative innovation, (2) IP in collaborative innovation, (3) IP licensing in collaboration agreements, (4) contextualization, and (5) complex product systems. We view the two concepts of open innovation and collaborative innovation as similar, with the labels being generally interchangeable, but, for simplicity and clarity, we adopt the label \"collaborative innovation.\" Collaborative innovation is arguably mandatory practice for firms seeking to maintain success in complex high-tech industries [1], [7]. However, collaborative innovation may be implemented differently depending on the inherent characteristics of each industry. Moreover, since complex products require engineeringintensive tasks and involve costly R&D efforts, they contain valuable technologies associated with higher potential losses if the shared technologies are leaked or imitated [8]. I","PeriodicalId":321998,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS-ISIE)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134634855","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"5G, Dynamic Capabilities and Business Models Innovation in Healthcare industry","authors":"Asta Pundziene, Sohvi Heaton, D. Teece","doi":"10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074330","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074330","url":null,"abstract":"5G technologies pose new challenges and provide opportunities, especially for industries like healthcare, where data and mobile remote communication play an important role in organizations’ ability to provide value-based services. Hospitals are therefore in need of innovating their business models to incorporate 5G-enabled opportunities. Our discussion highlights the mediating mechanisms by which dynamic capabilities and business models influence each other, clarifying what determines business-model innovation in an organizational setting. The premise of this research is that hospitals demonstrate emerging business model patterns that reflect a combination of their capabilities and the type of innovation involved. This paper develops a conceptual framework and presents four cases gathered from hospitals to unveil key ingredients of business models required for 5G-enabled healthcare services.","PeriodicalId":321998,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS-ISIE)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125077771","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Alliance Management Capability of Entrepreneurial Nonprofit Organizations and Cross-sector Alliance Performance: An fsQCA Approach","authors":"O. Bai, Jiang Wei","doi":"10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074367","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEMS-ISIE46312.2019.9074367","url":null,"abstract":"An overarching configuration perspective of alliance management capabilities (AMC) is ignored in the realm of cross-sector alliance research. This study fills this gap by exploring how AMC underpin the successful and greater performance of cross-sector alliances. This study examines four dimensions of AMC that affect the performance of crosssector alliance, viz., social impact realizing, relationship coordination, power balancing and inter-organizational learning, from the perspective of nonprofit organizations (NPOs). Based on a survey to socially entrepreneurial nonprofit organizations and their cross-sector alliances in tourism industry in China, this study uses the method of fuzzyset qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to investigate the connection between configuration of AMC and high alliance performance. The findings identify three solutions of different elements configuration of AMC leading to high cross-sector alliance performance. The findings have some theoretical contributions and practical implications for cross-sector alliance management.","PeriodicalId":321998,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Symposium on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (TEMS-ISIE)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133607848","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}