Introduction to English Legal History最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Nuisance 讨厌的东西
Introduction to English Legal History Pub Date : 2019-03-21 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198812609.003.0024
J. Baker
{"title":"Nuisance","authors":"J. Baker","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198812609.003.0024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198812609.003.0024","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter traces the history of the law of nuisance. The medieval assize of nuisance and the action quod permittat were not comprehensive, because minor complaints of nuisance were supposed to go to local courts. The central courts acquired a wider and more effective jurisdiction through the use of actions on the case. It became necessary to distinguish between the protection of easements and profits, which were property rights, and the protection of natural rights such as freedom from noise and smell, which depended on balancing interests and reasonable compromises. Case also lay for isolated escapes of harmful matter, though the older cases were misunderstood by the Lords in Rylands v. Fletcher (1868) to rest on strict liability. Another misunderstanding concerned public nuisance, which was not a cause of action but a bar to actions by plaintiffs who could not show special loss.","PeriodicalId":321735,"journal":{"name":"Introduction to English Legal History","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126539939","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Court of Chancery and Equity 衡平法院衡平法院
Introduction to English Legal History Pub Date : 2019-03-21 DOI: 10.1093/OSO/9780198812609.003.0006
J. Baker
{"title":"The Court of Chancery and Equity","authors":"J. Baker","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198812609.003.0006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198812609.003.0006","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter traces the history of the Court of Chancery and equity. The equitable jurisdiction derived from the extraordinary jurisdiction of the king’s council. By 1400 the chancellor had his own court and was issuing decrees in his own name. It was not tied to law but could coerce the conscience of a defendant, for instance to desist from an unconscionable suit at law. Equity was not in conflict with the law, but there was a dispute between Coke and Ellesmere in 1615 over injunctions after judgment. Most equitable principles began with relief given on the facts of individual cases, but the multitude of suits generated common principles, many of which were elucidated by Lord Nottingham. The court’s initially informal procedure became unmanageably complex as more suitors resorted to it. The later Chancery was a byword for delay and despair; the chapter ends with an account of its reform.","PeriodicalId":321735,"journal":{"name":"Introduction to English Legal History","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116482513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信