Quaderns de Filosofia最新文献

{"title":"Deliberación, polarización y posverdad. Repensar la responsabilidad en la sociedad digital","authors":"A. Wagner","doi":"10.7203/qfia.10.2.26616","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.10.2.26616","url":null,"abstract":"Deliberation, polarization and post-truth. Rethinking responsibility for digital societies Resumen: Ante las tendencias de autocratización y la pérdida de calidad democrática en muchos Estados, el artículo aborda los procesos de polarización que conducen al bloqueo político e institucional y limitan el margen de acción política. Amplificada por la digitalización de la esfera pública y el uso sistemático de desinformación, la polarización conduce a un deterioro de los procesos deliberativos. Esta pérdida de funcionalidad democrática ha dado aliento a un revisionismo democrático tecno-optimista que propone modelos de democracia algorítmica. Frente a los peligros de estas tendencias desenmascaradas como antidemocráticas, perfilamos un concepto de responsabilidad democrática adaptado al entorno de la sociedad digital.  Abstract: In face of autocratization trends and the loss of democratic quality in many states, the article addresses the processes of polarization that lead to political and institutional deadlock and limit the scope for political action. Amplified by the digitization of the public sphere and the systematic use of disinformation, polarization drives a deterioration of deliberative processes. This loss of democratic functionality has encouraged a techno-optimistic democratic revisionism that advocates models of algorithmic democracy. Against the dangers of these trends unmasked as anti-democratic, we outline a concept of democratic responsibility adapted to the digital society environment.","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":"148 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139206390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"El descubrimiento de la política: Solón de Atenas, por Salvador Rus Rufino y Francisco Arenas-Dolz","authors":"A. Marín","doi":"10.7203/qfia.1.1.26700","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.1.1.26700","url":null,"abstract":"Ressenya / Reseña / Review \u0000Rus Rufino, Salvador y Arenas-Dolz, Francisco 2022, El descubrimiento de la política: Solón de Atenas, Madrid: Tecnos. ISBN 978-84-309-8490-9, 379 páginas","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48939128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Contra la distopía, por Francisco Martorell Campos","authors":"Anna Bugajska","doi":"10.7203/qfia.1.1.26698","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.1.1.26698","url":null,"abstract":"Ressenya /Reseña / Review  \u0000Martorell Campos, Francisco 2021, Contra la distopía. La cara B de un género de masas, Valencia: La Caja Books. ISBN 978-84-17496-54-8, 256 páginas","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45716102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Habermas ante el siglo XXI. La proyección de la teoría de la acción comunicativa, por César Ortega Esquembre","authors":"Enrique Herreras Maldonado","doi":"10.7203/qfia.1.1.26225","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.1.1.26225","url":null,"abstract":"Ressenya / Reseña / Review  \u0000Ortega Esquembre, César 2021, Habermas ante el siglo XXI. La proyección de la teoría de la acción comunicativa, Madrid: Tecnos. ISBN 978-84-309-8159-5, 416 páginas","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42352573","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Una revisión de la \"teoría triple\" de Parfit","authors":"Manuel Bares Partal","doi":"10.7203/qfia.1.1.25877","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.1.1.25877","url":null,"abstract":"Revisiting Parfit’s ‘Triple Theory’  \u0000Resumen: En On What Matters, Derek Parfit trata, según nos dice él mismo, de solucionar lo que Sidgwick denominó “el dualismo de la razón práctica”. Según Sidgwick, el intuicionismo y el consecuencialismo son fácilmente compatibles dentro de un utilitarismo sensato, si bien no se pueden hacer compatibles con el egoísmo ético. Parfit, quien considera a Kant y al propio Sidgwick como sus dos influencias más importantes, cree que es posible encontrar una solución a través de lo que denomina The Triple Theory. Una vez rechazado el egoísmo ético, el intuicionismo objetivista puede hacerse compatible con el universalismo kantiano a través del consecuencialismo de Thomas Scanlon. La articulación y defensa de esta propuesta conforman los tres gruesos volúmenes de On What Matters. En este trabajo trataré de argumentar que, además de tener que enfrentar importantes problemas teóricos ya clásicos, el proyecto de unificación de las diferentes propuestas éticas puede dejar sin contestar importantes cuestiones prácticas que eran tratadas por las distintas teorías por separado. \u0000Abstract: The main topic in On What Matters is, in Parfit’s own words, trying to solve what Henry Sidgwick called “the practical reason´s dualism”. Following Sidgwick, intuitionism and consequentialism are easily compatible related to a reasonable utilitarianism, but both became strongly incompatible with ethic egoism. Parfit, who considers Kant and Sidgwick as his most important influence, believes that it is possible to find a solution through what he calls “The Triple Theory”. Once rejected ethical egoism in his several forms, he thinks that objectivist intuitionism can be compatible with Kantian universalism through Thomas Scanlon consequentialism in his work What We Owe Each Other. The structure and defense of this thesis will make up most of the three volumes of On What Matters. In this essay I will try to argue that, in addition to having to face several classical criticisms, the aim of unifying different ethical theories can leave unanswered important practical questions that where dealt with by the different theories separately.","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42248976","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Rethinking Society: Individuals, Culture and Migration. Vol. 1: Individuals and Society, por Vladimer Luarsabishvili (ed.)","authors":"Lucía Hellín Nistal","doi":"10.7203/qfia.1.1.26213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.1.1.26213","url":null,"abstract":"Ressenya / Reseña / Review \u0000Luarsabishvili, Vladimer (ed.) 2021, Rethinking Society: Individuals, Culture and Migration. Vol. 1: Individuals and Society, Tbilisi: New Vision University Press. ISBN 978-9941-9692-7-0, 121 páginas","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47930775","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Patologías sociales. Un debate en la teoría crítica contemporánea","authors":"César Ortega-Esquembre","doi":"10.7203/qfia.1.1.25902","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.1.1.25902","url":null,"abstract":"Social pathologies. A debate in contemporary critical theory Resumen: El objetivo del presente trabajo es exponer los rasgos fundamentales del debate contemporáneo en torno a las llamadas patologías sociales, así como los principales diagnósticos sobre patologías sociales formulados por la teoría crítica contemporánea. Para ello analizaré en primer lugar el trabajo tradicionalmente considerado canónico para comprender el debate actual sobre las patologías sociales, a saber, un artículo de Axel Honneth publicado en 1994 bajo el título de “Patologías de lo social”. En segundo lugar, expondré algunos diagnósticos sobre patologías sociales concretas formulados por los principales representantes contemporáneos de la teoría crítica. Sobre la base de una visión panorámica de estos diagnósticos, procederé en tercer y último lugar a ofrecer una propuesta de definición provisional del concepto de patología social que tenga en cuenta las diversas posturas mantenidas en el debate filosófico actual. Abstract: The aim of this paper is to present the key features of the contemporary debate around the so-called social pathologies, as well as the main diagnoses on social pathologies formulated by contemporary critical theory. To do this, I first analyse the founding paper of the current debate on social pathologies: Axel Honneth’s work “Pathologies of the social”. Secondly, I present some diagnoses on concrete social pathologies formulated by the main contemporary representatives of critical theory. Based on an overview of these diagnoses, I offer a proposal for a provisional definition of the concept of social pathology that takes into account the different positions maintained in the current philosophical debate.","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48859238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Salvador Feliu y el \"problema\" de la filosofía española","authors":"A. Ferrer García","doi":"10.7203/qfia.1.1.26697","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.1.1.26697","url":null,"abstract":"Obituari / Obituario / Obituary \u0000Salvador Feliu Castelló, In Memoriam","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43665757","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cuando la disputa va en pro y el discurso representa la contra: conceptos histórico-filosóficos y su transferencia epocal","authors":"José Manuel Sánchez Fernández","doi":"10.7203/qfia.1.1.26707","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.1.1.26707","url":null,"abstract":"When the dispute goes in favor and the discourse represents the against: historical-philosophical concepts and their epochal transfer. \u0000Resumen: Tras los conceptos se esconden tantas verdades como realidades y para elucidarlas extraemos, como si de un fluido se tratara, su destilada verdad. Plegado a su sentido etimológico original el verbo disputare implica una selección extractiva de aquello que se quiere orientar orgánica y adecuadamente. Por este motivo, el presente trabajo trata sobre los conceptos y su función generadora de disputas. Aprovechando la reciente publicación del volumen colectivo editado por Maximiliano Hernández y Héctor del Estal: Conceptos en disputa, disputas sobre conceptos (Dykinson 2022) se lleva a cabo un recorrido por las trece contribuciones que lo componen, cuya conexión es la de mostrar la pluralidad de perspectivas contenidas en un concepto, así como su transferencia histórica, política y epistemológica. \u0000Abstract: Behind the concepts are hidden as many truths as realities and to elucidate them we extract, as if it were a fluid, their distilled truth. Folded to its original etymological sense, the verb disputare implies an extractive selection of what one wants to orient organically and adequately. For this reason, this paper deals with the concepts and their role as a generator of disputes. Taking advantage of the recent publication of the collective volume edited by Maximiliano Hernández and Héctor del Estal: Conceptos en disputa, disputas sobre conceptos (Dykinson 2022), a tour of the thirteen contributions that compose it is carried out, whose connection is to show plurality of perspectives contained in a concept, as well as its historical, political and epistemological transfer.","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47311105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ciego, sordo y mudo: el sistema sanitario ante la objeción de conciencia al aborto","authors":"Rosana Triviño","doi":"10.7203/qfia.9.2.22955","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7203/qfia.9.2.22955","url":null,"abstract":"Blind, deaf, and mute: the healthcare system regarding conscientious objection to abortion \u0000Resumen: A la luz de la obra de Fernando Broncano, Conocimiento expropiado (2020), este trabajo plantea la objeción de conciencia generalizada al aborto como un fenómeno que origina situaciones de injusticia epistémica. El acceso a la información, el disvalor del testimonio de las mujeres y el silencio cómplice, individual e institucional, perpetuador de la ignorancia sistémica son realidades que afectan a un número indeterminado de mujeres que requiere la interrupción de su embarazo. Para hacer frente al daño generado, se plantea cómo las redes y movimientos pro-elección distribuyen información y recursos sobre el aborto fuera del ámbito clínico y se organizan como fuerzas de resistencia epistémica, capaces de crear y compartir conocimiento en un ejercicio de democracia radical, en el sentido expresado por Broncano. \u0000Abstract: In accordance with Fernando Broncano’s work, Conocimiento expropiado (2020), this paper considers the widespread conscientious objection to abortion as a phenomenon that creates situations of epistemic injustice. Access to information, devaluation of women’s testimony, as well as individual and institutional complicit silence that perpetuates systemic ignorance, are realities that affect an indeterminate number of women who require the termination of their pregnancies. In order to address the damage generated, we consider how pro-choice networks and movements distribute information and resources on abortion outside the clinical sphere. They also organise themselves as forces of epistemic resistance, capable of creating and sharing knowledge in an exercise of radical democracy, in the sense expressed by Broncano. \u0000Palabras clave: Objeción de conciencia, aborto, injusticia epistémica, ignorancia institucional, resistencia epistémica. \u0000Keywords: Conscientious objection, abortion, epistemic injustice, institutional ignorance, epistemic resistance.","PeriodicalId":31627,"journal":{"name":"Quaderns de Filosofia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49267488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}