M. Kleymenov, Margarita G. Kozlowskya, A. I. Savelyev
{"title":"“AUE” Extremist Criminal Community","authors":"M. Kleymenov, Margarita G. Kozlowskya, A. I. Savelyev","doi":"10.24147/1990-5173.2020.17(4).75-80","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24147/1990-5173.2020.17(4).75-80","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The recognition by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of the youth movement “AUE” as an extremist organization requires criminological analysis, both from the point of view of the social conditionality of a socially dangerous phenomenon, and in terms of possible criminal planning. Purpose. The goal is to consider the development of the criminal community of AUE and show what exactly determines the degree and scale of its criminality, to suggest the main directions of the strategy for countering this phenomenon. Methodology. Historical, systematic, and logical research methods are used. Results. In the historical context, the abbreviation “AUE” has several interpretations. One of them is indicated in the decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. The second sounds like this: “the convict way of life is one”, the third - “the convict urkagan unity”. In any case, we are talking about the spread of criminal ideology, which for a long time in Russia was not only ignored, but even “attached” to it in the form of perception and widespread use of Argo by professional criminals in the media. Within the framework of its activities and in its interests, members of the “AUE” committed extremist offenses, as well as mass riots. The movement's activities based on criminal and extremist ideology pose a real threat to the life and health of citizens, society and the state. The lack of attention of law enforcement agencies to this problem allowed the Association “AUE” to involve hundreds of thousands (and by some estimates - millions) of young people in its ranks and take root in the information and network space. The fascination with the younger generations ideas of the “AUE” is a natural result of the marginalization of the population, its sharp differentiation in access to standards of modern civilization, the result of the masses of poor, downtrodden people (F. M. Dostoevsky), located on the periphery of the living space - in the social and territorial dimensions. There is reason to believe that the emergence of the Association “AUE” is one of the embodiments of criminal design carried out by the criminal community of “thieves in law”. Conclusion. Association “AUE” corresponds to the characteristics of an extremist community. However, the strategy to counter this phenomenon should follow a certain order. First of all, it is necessary to block the trend of marginalization of the population. Second of all, it is necessary to establish special control over those objects where criminal ideology is especially actively implanted. The third is to ensure effective monitoring of social networks. And only in the fourth - to address the application of criminal law.","PeriodicalId":310093,"journal":{"name":"Herald of Omsk University. Series: Law","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115362054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Legal Means to Prevent Unjustified Payment of Pensions to Citizens Living Abroad","authors":"O. S. Kurchenko","doi":"10.24147/1990-5173.2020.17(4).53-64","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24147/1990-5173.2020.17(4).53-64","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The legislation of the Russian Federation provides for the possibility of paying most types of pensions to those citizens whose place of permanent residence is a foreign state. At the same time, permanent residence of a pensioner abroad increases the risk of unjustified payment of pensions and creates the need to use additional legal means aimed at preventing such consequences. Purpose. The purpose of the study is to describe the system of legal means that are aimed at preventing unjustified payment of Russian pensions to citizens living abroad, and to analyze the provisions of Russian and international legal acts that establish these legal means. Methodology. To achieve these goals, formal legal (dogmatic) method and comparative legal method were mainly used. Results. The system of legal means to prevent unjustified payments to those Russian citizens who permanently reside abroad includes legal means provided for by national legislation and the norms of international treaties concluded by the Russian Federation. The first group is represented mainly by additional obligations of the beneficiary to inform the pension agency about maintaining the grounds for payment of pensions (especially the duty to confirm being alive), failure to which, as a general rule, constitute grounds for the suspension of payment of pension. The legal means stipulated in international legal acts are based on the interaction of the competent institutions of the Contracting parties and are implemented, as a rule, without the participation of the pension recipient. Conclusion. The expansion of the list of States with which Russia has concluded international agreements on cooperation in the field of social security and the improvement of national legislation in this area should help reduce the number of cases of excessive payment of pensions to citizens living abroad.","PeriodicalId":310093,"journal":{"name":"Herald of Omsk University. Series: Law","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115928167","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"To the Concept of Asylum. Right or Duty of the State?","authors":"O. Semyonova","doi":"10.24147/1990-5173.2020.17(4).65-74","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24147/1990-5173.2020.17(4).65-74","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article is devoted to the concept and legal characteristics of asylum. The relevance of the topic is due to the eclectic character of the research available in the literature on this issue. Purpose. Definition of the concept of asylum, as well as research on whether asylum is a right or an obligation of the state. Methodology. The study of problems was carried out on the basis of scientific analysis and synthesis, formal-logical, system, comparative-legal methods, the method of interpretation of law, etc. The theoretical basis of the research is the scientific works of domestic and foreign legal scientists, practicing lawyers in the field of general theory of state and law, public international law, constitutional law of Russia and Germany. Results. Asylum should be considered in three aspects: as a legal institution, as a form of protection of human rights, and as a legal position. Asylum as a form of protection is the temporary territorial protection of fundamental human rights granted by the state to a refugee (as defined in the 1951 Convention relating to the status of refugees), whose main characteristics are security, dignity, fundamental human rights and freedoms, family unity and confidentiality. The human right to asylum as temporary protection is a fundamental human right. The provision of permanent protection and integration in the state of asylum is the sovereign right of states. Conclusion. For the effective functioning of the asylum system in Russia and to avoid conflicts in law enforcement practice, it is necessary to consolidate the concept of asylum at the legislative level. When improving the legal framework for granting asylum in Russia, it is necessary to take into account the following characteristics of the right to asylum in accordance with international standards and to provide legal guarantees for granting asylum on a temporary basis.","PeriodicalId":310093,"journal":{"name":"Herald of Omsk University. Series: Law","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122784214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Specific Issues of the Resolving of the Internal and Cross-Border \u0000Conflict of Laws in the United States of America","authors":"Ivan Chumachenko","doi":"10.24147/1990-5173.2020.17(4).31-40","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24147/1990-5173.2020.17(4).31-40","url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The relevance of the article is due to the development of cross-border trade relations with the participation of residents of the United States of America and other states, in particular, and interest in questions about the correct choice of the applicable law in the framework of legal relations with the participation of US residents carried out in the territory or under the jurisdiction of the United States. Purpose. The author aims to consider the basic concepts, as well as some features of resolving conflicts arising between the provisions of federal law, the laws of certain states with the laws of other states, as well as, in some cases, with international law. Methodology. In the framework of the study, the author used various methods, in particular, the dialectical method, methods of analysis, synthesis, the formal legal method, the comparative legal method, as well as the method of interpretation of legal acts and judicial precedents. Results. The author examined the features of conflict resolution in accordance with statutory legislation, judicial precedents, as well as US doctrinal sources. The author provides the basic concepts regarding conflict law, which contain the main approaches to resolving the conflict of various jurisdictions in the United States. Conclusion. Based on the results of the study, the author concludes that even if there are separate (special) legal acts, court cases, as well as doctrinal sources that, it would seem, should help overcome conflicts between different legal systems, given the diversity of legal relations, such collisions will arise in the future, which will push lawmakers to further develop issues of US conflict law.","PeriodicalId":310093,"journal":{"name":"Herald of Omsk University. Series: Law","volume":"7237 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125402391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}