{"title":"4. Reproductive Justice and the Right to Parent","authors":"","doi":"10.1525/9780520963207-005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520963207-005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":305783,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Justice","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125014868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"4. The Ruling Relations of Reproductive Health Care","authors":"","doi":"10.36019/9780813564708-006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813564708-006","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":305783,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Justice","volume":"39 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131688014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"9. Genocidal Consequences: Contraception, Sterilization, and Abortion in the Fourth-World Context","authors":"","doi":"10.36019/9780813564708-011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813564708-011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":305783,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Justice","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114114888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"6. “To Uphold the Federal Government’s Obligations . . . and to Honor and Protect”: The Double Discourse of the Indian Health Service","authors":"","doi":"10.36019/9780813564708-008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36019/9780813564708-008","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":305783,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Justice","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130228086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Why a Right to Life Rules Out Infanticide: A Final Reply to Räsänen","authors":"B. Blackshaw, D. Rodger","doi":"10.1111/bioe.12646","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12646","url":null,"abstract":"Joona Räsänen has argued that pro-life arguments against the permissibility of infanticide are not persuasive, and fail to show it to be immoral. We responded to Räsänen's arguments, concluding that his critique of pro-life arguments was misplaced. Räsänen has recently replied in 'Why pro-life arguments still are not convincing: A reply to my critics', providing some additional arguments as to why he does not find pro-life arguments against infanticide convincing. Here, we respond briefly to Räsänen's critique of the substance view, and also to his most important claim: that possession of a right to life by an infant does not rule out the permissibility of infanticide. We demonstrate that this claim is unfounded, and conclude that Räsänen has not refuted pro-life arguments against infanticide.","PeriodicalId":305783,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Justice","volume":"211 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"119411331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Reproductive Rights and Justice: A Multiple Feminist Theories Account","authors":"L. Ikemoto","doi":"10.4337/9781786439697.00023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439697.00023","url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the impact of liberal feminism and critical race theory on reproductive rights and justice in the United States. Liberal feminism has played a key role in this fight. Other feminist theories, including, prominently, critical race theory, have taken the mainstream reproductive rights movement to task for marginalizing the voices and experience of women of color and low-income women, thus reinforcing stratified reproduction. This work has put issues like surrogacy, coerced sterilization, welfare family caps and criminal prosecution of pregnant women on the reproductive rights and justice agenda. Interaction among feminist theories has produced a dialectic and evolution that enable them to meet new challenges. Similarly, a multi-theory account of reproductive rights and justice issues produces a more useful analysis and range of strategies than a single theory approach.","PeriodicalId":305783,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Justice","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115897544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Title IX's Reproductive Remedies","authors":"F. Cocuzza","doi":"10.7916/D8ZG74S5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8ZG74S5","url":null,"abstract":"Despite the growing public outcry surrounding sexual assault at colleges and universities, the problem of pregnancy among survivors has been given inadequate attention. Meanwhile, institutions of higher education continue to resist compliance with federal law mandating insurance coverage of reproductive health care for their students. This Note argues that Title IX, the civil rights law prohibiting sex discrimination in schools, requires colleges and universities to make contraception and emergency contraception available on campus to student survivors of sexual assault. If pregnancy is understood as an injury when it results from rape, Title IX obliges schools to take these steps to remedy that injury and prevent its recurrence. In order for student survivors to realize the equal education opportunity envisioned by Title IX, access to contraception and emergency contraception is critical. Finally, I argue that reading Title IX as a vehicle for contraceptive access could reignite broader doctrinal implications for reproductive justice as an issue of sex equality.","PeriodicalId":305783,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Justice","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128431825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Unpacking the Relationship between Conscience and Access","authors":"R. Wilson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2912515","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2912515","url":null,"abstract":"Many people reflexively accept or reject healthcare conscience protections. Those prizing religious freedom argue that conscience protections ensure that religious believers can both take jobs in medicine and act consonant with their faith. This group sometimes gives short shrift to concerns about access to needed medical services. On the other side, advocates for reproductive rights sometimes see access concerns as so overriding that no religious convictions should ever be accommodated, even when there would not be impact on access. Both accounts are too simplistic. \u0000This chapter provides a more nuanced account of healthcare conscience protections that balances the concerns of access and conscience. It does so by dividing conscious clauses into categories that are access-expanding, access-neutral, or access-contracting, distilling characteristics that make a conscience clause a threat to access, a wash for access, or, counter-intuitively, access-enhancing. This chapter also recognizes the challenge of access-freezing “super conscience clauses.” \u0000This chapter demonstrates that it is possible to balance conscience and access in at least some cases by using common-sense devices, such as notice, parity rules, protections conditioned on not causing harm, and thickened duties to transfer pregnant women in distress. This Chapter recognizes that some protections jeopardize access more than others. \u0000In a civil society, we should strive to maximize conscience protections without jeopardizing access. As the U.S. Supreme Court’s remand in Zubik v. Burwell reminds us, realizing reproductive access without encroaching on conscience is sometimes achievable and a desirable goal.","PeriodicalId":305783,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Justice","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123643454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}